103 Flashcards
What are the 2 primary purposes of diversion?
• Rehabilitation - to prevent re-offending & encourage them to reflect on harm done to victim.• Reparation - payment of money, apology letter, repair damage done to property, make donation to approved charity group.
What are the 3 secondary purposes of diversion?
• Encourage offender to take responsibility for actions and show remorse• Eliminate factors that put them at risk of reoffending• Avoid their first conviction and give them another chance
Can you offer diversion if you have insufficient to charge?
• diversion is not an option if there is insufficient evidence to proceed with charge.
What happens if defendant does not complete diversion?
• If a charge has been laid and offender does not complete diversion, the charge can still proceed.• If offender reoffends while on diversion, they may no longer be suitable.
When is diversion appropriate?
• Entered a guilty plea but have not been convicted• Not entered a plea, but have acknowledged guilt and accepted full responsibility by admitting and showing remorse.• First time offender, so they can avoid conviction• In some cases it may be appropriate to offer diversion to persons with previous youth convictions, past convictions or previous diversion when:1. Current offending is caused by underlying problem likely to respond to counselling.2. Direct or indirect consequences of conviction would be out of proportion to the seriousness of the offence.3. The offender’s previous court outcomes were over five years ago• Summary offences or indictable offences that are triable summarily.• Traffic offences laid as a TON, such as careless, reckless.
When is diversion not appropriate?
• Recidivist offender• Offender who received diversion for similar offence in the past - except in exceptional circumstances• For a contested traffic infringement - as they are not admitting guilt or responsibility.• For a serious offence - unless circumstances and harm are at the bottom end of the scale• For purely indictable offences• All offences carrying a warning under the 3 strikes legislation• EBA offences
What must diversion conditions be? (3)
Conditions must be Proportionate, Achievable and Appropriate to the offence.
Can children and young persons be dealt with through the adult diversion scheme?
• CYP under 17 who are offenders should be dealt with under the CYPF Act 1989
What are some aggravating factors, that may prevent offender from getting diversion
• Offence was calculated and deliberate• Carried out by group• Against a public servant• Offender was ringleader• Conviction likely to result in significant penalty• Weapon or violence used• Abused position of trust• Victim vulnerable• Refuses to identify cooffenders• High prevalence of offence.• On bail, other charges pending• Previously received diversion for the same type of offence• 3 strike offence
Mitigating factors for diversion
• Arrest and time in custody sufficient deterrent• Misjudgement, coercion, vulnerable• Remorseful• Was ignorant to the law• Was provoked by victim• mental or physical illness• genuine mistake or misunderstanding• Conviction likely to result in nominal penalty
What is the Criminal Records Act 2004 “clean slate?”
• Individuals with less serious convictions who have been conviction free for (in most cases) at least seven years, to put their past behind them.
Which drug offences are/aren’t eligible for diversion?
Do not consider for Class A or B, however may consider for small amount of cannabis oil (B), needles, utensils, or cultivating cannabis (C)
Under the evidence act 2006, what is a ‘witness’?
EVIDENCE ACT 2006 S.4• ‘Witness’ means a person who gives evidence and is able to be cross-examined in a proceeding .
Define a ‘child complainant’:
Child complainant, in relation to any proceeding means a complainant who is a child when the proceeding commences.
What can judge do, on his own initiative or application of either party, in terms of giving evidence (S.103 Evidence Act)?
• In any proceeding the judge may, either of application of a party or on judges own initiative, direct witness to give evidence in chief and be cross examined in the ordinary way or in an alternative way as provided by S.105
What must the JUDGE have regard to?
- Fairness in the proceeding and that there is a fair trial,2. Need to minimise stress on witness and need to promote recovery of complainant of offence.
Who does this apply to (give evidence in alternate way)
1.age2. Disability, mental or physical2. Trauma (of the event).4. Linguistic or cultural barrier,5. Nature of proceeding or evidence to be given6.relationship of witness to offender,7. Absence from NZ
What must PROSECUTOR do, if person is giving evidence in an alternative way?
Must apply to court for direction on how child complainant give evidence
Under S.105 Evidence Act, what alternative ways can evidence be given?
• Witness in courtroom is unable to see defendant (Def can see witness unless judge directs otherwise in exceptional circumstances) “screening”.• From an appropriate place outside the courtroom• By a video record made before the hearing (in this case judge must give direction under s.103 as to manner of cross examination and re-examination of witness).
What does S.90 Evidence Act allow a witness to do before giving evidence
• S.90 Evidence Act - witness may refresh their memory from any signed statement made by them before giving evidence and entering court room. (Includes Police)
What must you advise witnesses in the courtroom?w
Must advise them not to talk to other witnesses about their evidence while waiting
Under S.168 Summary Proceedings Act, when must the prosecutor file formal written statements
• Must be filed together with exhibits referred to in the statements, no later than 42 days after:1. The date the defendant elects trial by jury 2. If the information is laid indictably, the date on which the def fist appears in court in relation to that information.
What is a ‘formal written statement’
• Purports to be signed by person making statement• Contains statement at end “everything is true and correct…”
If statement is made by person under 18, what must it contain
They must state how old they are in the statement
In regards to formal statements If person cannot read what should you do
• If person can’t read, read it to them, get them to sign it. Then attach signed statement to that statement stating person appeared to understand its contents.
Who can apply for an oral evidence order?
Either party (Defence or Prosecution) may apply to DC judge for order allowing oral examination at a committal hearing
On what grounds can apply for an oral evidence order?
Judge must be satisfied that the witness who provided the statement must be heard in order to prove there is sufficient evidence for a case or necessary in the interest of justice orPerson refused to make a formal written statement and is relevant to the charge
When must the application for oral evidence be made?
Application must be made no later than 14 days after the date on which the prosecutor is required to file written statements
Under the Bail Act 2000, everyone who is charged with an offence shall be……….
released on reasonable terms and conditions unless there is just cause for continued detention”.
Under S.7 who is bailable by right?
charged with an offence that is not punishable by imprisonment.or maximum punishment is less than 3 years.
A defendant who is bailable as of right must be released on reasonable terms and conditions unless…..
the offence is MAF/Assault child/Breach protection order.
Under S.8 (1) what must the Court consider before granting bail?
• Court must take into consideration whether Defendant is likely to• Fail to appear, interfere with witnesses or evidence, offend while on bail
Under S.8(2) what other considerations are made?
• Nature of the offence and whether it is a grave or less serious one of its kind:• Strength of the evidence and the probability of conviction or otherwise:• Seriousness of the punishment to which the defendant is liable, and the severity of the punishment that is likely to be imposed:• Character and past conduct or behaviour, in particular proven criminal behaviour, of the defendant:• History of offending while on bail, or breaching court orders, including orders imposing bail conditions:• Likely length of time before the matter comes to hearing or trial:• Possibility of prejudice to the defence in the preparation of the defence if the defendant is remanded in custody:
Under S.10, what are specified offences?
• section 128B (sexual violation):]• section 167 (murder):• section 168 (murder):• section 171 (manslaughter):• section 173 (attempt to murder):• section 188 (wounding with intent):• section 189 (injuring with intent):• section 191 (aggravated wounding or injury):• section 198A (using any firearm against law enforcement officer, etc):• section 198B (commission of crime with firearm):• section 234 (robbery):• section 235 (aggravated robbery).
Who does S.10 of the bail act apply to (specified offences)
• Applies to defendant of or over 17• Who is charged with a specified offence and who has 1 or more previous convictions for a specified offence
Who can grant bail to a person charged with a specified offence?
Only a High Court Judge or a District Court Judge.
In relation to S.10 bail act, what must the defendant satisfy the judge, in order to receive bail?
Defendant must satisfy the Judge on the balance of probabilities that he will not, while on bail or at large, commit any offence involving violence against, or danger to the safety of, any other person.
Under S.11, what other restriction exists in relation to specified offences? Who does this apply to?
• No defendant of or over 17 years who is found guilty of, or pleads guilty to, a specified offence• and who has 1 or more previous convictions for a specified offence (whether those convictions were for the same specified offence or for different specified offences)• may, while waiting to be sentenced or otherwise dealt with for the first-mentioned specified offence, be granted bail or allowed to go at large.
What restrictions to bail does section 12 provide? Who does this apply to?
If defendant is of or over 17 years and• (a) penalty carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years’ imprisonment; and• at the time of the offence was remanded at large or on bail awaiting trial for another offence that carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years’ imprisonment; and• at any time previously received a sentence of imprisonment OR(b)• The defendant is of or over 17 years and—• is charged with an offence that carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years’ imprisonment; and• has previously received 14 or more sentences of imprisonment and• has previously been convicted of an offence that was committed while the defendant was remanded at large or on bail and that carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years.
Under S.12 The onus is on…………………..as to whether bail is/not granted.
Under section 12, the onus is on Defendant to prove to judge that bail should be granted.
What does section 15 say with regard to 17-20 year olds?
• (There is a presumption bail will be granted unless 10, 12 or 16 of Bail Act applies)• Can only be detained in prison if “no other course is desirable, having consideration to all the circumstances”.• In this case, seek guidance from an experienced youth aid officer.• Youth records are not convictions that count toward ‘specified offences’.
Under section 16 who can grant bail for a drug dealing offence?
• In any case, by order of a High Court Judge; or• If the defendant does not have any previous conviction for a drug dealing offence, by order of a District Court Judge.
What section is the power to grant police bail?
POWER TO GRANT POLICE BAIL S.21(1) Any Police employee may, if he or she considers it prudent to do so bail a person who—• is charged with an offence for which that person may be proceeded against summarily; and• has been arrested without warrant; and• cannot practicably be brought immediately before a court.
When should offenders be bailed to appear if given police bail
• Must be bailed no later than 7 days from the date of the bond, the person bailed attend personally before a court.• Bail is restricted if Def is K9’d under S.50 Domestic violence Act (breach protection order).
Who can Police NOT grant bail to?
Police Cannot Grant Bail when:• Def charged with specified offence and has a previous conviction for specified offence (S.10)• Restrictions apply under S.12• Defendant is charged with drug dealing offence• Charged with purely indictable offence• Arrested on a warrant
When a BOB occurs can police arrest without warrant? Enter private premises to make arrest?
• May be arrested without warrant in certain circumstancesNo power without warrant to enter private property to make arrest• No power to enter property to make bail check• (BOB is not an offence punishable by imprisonment)• A warrant under S.36 permits entry to any premises where there are RG for believing the defendant is on the premises
What pol form is an Op to Bail?
OP TO BAIL FORM - POL128
What is visual identification evidence?
an assertion by a person, based wholly or partly on what that person saw, to the effect that a defendant was present at or near a place where an act constituting direct or circumstantial evidence of the commission of an offence was done at, or about, the time the act was done; or(b) an account (whether oral or in writing) of an assertion of the kind described in paragraph(a)
If formal procedure for visual identification is followed, defendant must prove what?
S.45 places burden of proof on defendant, he must prove that the evidence was unreliable
If a formal visual identification procedure not followed, prosecution must prove what?
it must prove that the circumstances in which the identification was made have produced a reliable identification.
When should formal identification procedure be undertaken?
Procedure is to be undertaken asap after the alleged offence is reported to an officer of an enforcement agency.
What are the guidelines for a formal identification procedure?
• Done as soon as practicable after the alleged offence is reported• Person to be identified is compared to no fewer than 7 other persons who are similar in appearance and• No indication is given as to who among the persons in the procedure is the person to be identified; and• Person is informed that the person to be identified may or may not be among the persons in the procedure; and• That is the subject of a written record of the procedure actually followed that is sworn to be true and complete by the officer who conducted the procedure and provided to the Judge and the defendant (but not the jury) at the hearing;
What are good reasons for not following a formal identification procedure
• Suspect refuses to take part in procedure.• The singular appearance of the person to be identified• Substantial change in the appearance of the person to be identified• No officer involved could reasonably anticipate that identification would be an issue• ID of a person alleged to have committed an offence has been made to an officer of an enforcement agency soon after the offence was reported and in the course of that officer’s initial investigation:• Identification of a person alleged to have committed an offence has been made to an officer of an enforcement agency after a chance meeting between the person who made the identification and suspect
When voice identification is used, what must the prosecution prove?
The prosecution must prove on the balance of probabilities that the circumstances giving rise to the identification were reliable.
When must mandatory disclosure be made by?
Deadline asap but no later than 21 days from commencement of proceedings.
When does obligation for REQUESTED ADDITONAL disclosure commence?
• after a not guilty plea has been entered, trial by jury has been elected or first appearance on indictable charges• Deadline is preferably 14 days before next substantive hearing.
When does obligation for FULL disclosure commence?
• Starts after a not guilty plea for an offence (proceeded against summarily) is entered- deadline is 14 days before next substantive hearing.• After trial by jury is elected or first appearance on indictably laid charges - deadline is as soon as reasonably practicable.
When do ‘proceedings commence’?
“Commencement of Proceedings” means when summons is served or when defendant first appears in court following their arrest.
What is meant be the term ‘prosecutor’?
Prosecutor” is any police staff responsible for a file
What is meant by the term “relevance”
Relevance” - Info or an exhibit is ‘relevant’ if it tends to support or rebut, or has a material bearing on the case against the Defendant.
S.14(2) allows prosecutor to withhold information when?
Not relevantThe request appears frivolous or vexatiousIt may be withheld under S.15 - 18• S.15 - not in control or possession of the information;• S.16 - disclosure of the information is hlikely to prejudice the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences or disclosure of the information is likely to endanger the safety of any person• S.17 - it may lead to the identification or address of witness• S.18 - it would disclose a trade secret or prejudice commercial position
What does S.344C say about identification witnesses?
• Enables defendant to request info on a witness who has id’d him.• This is an exception to the rule that witnesses details are withheld• May request the name, address, any statements or identikit pictures the witness has made
When must a witnesses previous convictions be disclosed?
• Must be disclosed if relevant to the credibility of the witness• Convictions generally disclosed are perjury, attempting to pervert, assault or violence or dishonesty.• The Clean state Act doesn’t count and any historic relevant offences must be disclosed.
S.16 of the victims rights act restricts the disclosure of a persons address unless it is contained in………..
S.16 Victim’s Rights Act 2002 restricts disclosure of victims precise address, unless the address is contained in a charge (S.16A)
What may be the result of failing to disclose?
could see evidence excluded, case being dismissed, a retrial ordered.
What are the guidelines around inspection of exhibits?
Police must allow inspection of exhibits when• defence asks police to allow inspection• The exhibits are specified on the list of exhibits• Place may place conditions on this to ensure safety and integrity of exh.• May refuse inspection if the exh is being used for ongoing enforcement purposes and inspection would prejudice law enforcement.• Notify defence of how and when inspection will take place• Copy and disclose any exh that can be easily reproduced - like photos.• Police can refuse or restrict access in certain cases and defence not entitled as of right to test it - e.g. a blood stained shirt.
One of the principles laid down in the victims right act 2002 guides access to service for victims. In this respect police must inform victims that
they are entitled to access to welfare, health, medical or legal services
What must be ascertained early in an initial interview with a victim who has been assaulted?
the safety of the victim and the seriousness of the offence
When a victim elects to go on the VNR they will receive notification from different agencies. Match the agency with the type of information they hold about the offender status:NZ Parole BoardDepartment of Correction Ministry of HealthDepartment of Labour - if the offender escapes, dies, or is temporarily released - if the offender has an upcoming parole hearing - if the offender is not a NZ citizen and subject to deportation proposal - if the offender is entitled to the first unescorted leave or discharged.
Department of Correction - if the offender escapes, dies, or is temporarily releasedNZ Parole Board - if the offender has an upcoming parole hearing Department of Labour - if the offender is not a NZ citizen and subject to deportation proposalMinistry of Health - if the offender is entitled to the first unescorted leave or discharged
What are the police responsibilities to the victim when a section 29 suspect is released on bail?
police must advise the victim as soon as practicable, of the outcome and conditions of any bail application
When must a victim of a section 29 offence be advised of their right to be on the Victim Notification System (VNR)?
at the time of the offenders arrest
Victim Rights Act 2002 Section 29 offences are defined as
-sexual or serious assault resulting in injury, -death or being rendered incapable -leading to the victim having fears for their safety or the safety of their family.
Old Terminology: 1. Accused 2. Defended hearing 3. Informant 4. Information / indictment5. Lay charges 6. Summary / indictable
New Terminology 1. Defendant 2. Judge Alone Trial 3. Prosecutor 4. Charging document 5. File Charges 6. Categories of offences
5 Stages of Criminal proceedings
Commencement Administration Review Trial Disposition
Describe Commencement
Proceedings commence before the first appearance when either a charging document is filed or a defendant requests a hearing for an infringement notice.
Describe Administration
This stage involves the defendant making their first appearances in court, receiving disclosure, seeking legal advice, entering a plea
Describe Review
This stage will include the prosecutor and defence lawyer having an out of court case management discussion. This will usually be followed by a Case Review hearing, presided over by a Judge
Describe Trial
Now includes JAT as well as jury trial
Describe Disposition
Completion of prosecution and occurs in all cases, even if a trial has not occurred.
Category 1 offences
FINE ONLY Cat 1 offences are NOT punishable by imprisonment. In cat 1 matters: - The defendant can plead guilty by notice to the registrar - If the defendant pleads NG there will be a JAT in the district court - If the defendant does not appear when required, matter can proceed in the defendants absence
Category 2 offences
LESS THAN TWO YEARS IMPRISONMENT Cat 2 offences have a max penalty of 2 years or a community based sentence.In cat 2 matters: - Case management provisions apply - Any trial us a Judge Alone trial in the District Court
Category 3 offence
ALL OFFENCES NOT IN CAT 1,2, or 4 Cat 3 are punishable by at least 2 years imprisonment, and are not cat 4 offences. In cat 3 matters: - Case management provisions apply - The defendant has the right to elect trial by jury - The trial (JAT or Jury) may be in the District Court or High Court
Category 4 offence
THE MOST SERIOUS OFFENCES Cat 4 are the most serious; murder and manslaughter for example In Cat 4: - Case management provisions apply- The Crown is always the prosecutor - The trial is always a jury trial in the High Court
What are the two tests contained in the Solicitor General’s Prosecution Guidelines?
- Evidential Test 2. Public Interest test
Can a summons for a Cat 1 offence be served by post?Yes / No
Yes. BUT , not by electronic means like fax or email
A WTA in lieu of summons can only be issued if:
- A charging document has been filed AND - You have not been able to serve the summons
BAIL. If police bail conditions ARE imposed. The date of the hearing must be no more that ____ consecutive days from when the date bail was granted
7
BAIL. If police bail conditions are NOT imposed. The date of the hearing must be no more that ____ days from when the date bail was granted
14
What must an initial disclosure pack include?
- A copy of the charging document AND - A summary of facts AND - A QHA printout AND - a POL 2127 Initial Disclosure Record
which test is described in this statement:It is met if there is sufficient admissible evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction
The evidential test
The PPS will now conduct Jury trials for Cat 3 offences. TRUE or FALSE
FALSE
Where must proposed court bail conditions be recorded?
In the NIA charge module
Can 2 or more charges be heard together? Yes/ No
Yes
Can the charges against one defendant be heard together with the charges against another defendant? Yes/ No
Yes
True or false: There is automatic name suppression for child complainants and child witnesses
True
In what circumstance will the Crown take over prosecution for a Breach of Bail?
In cases where the Crown are already responsible for the charge that led to bail
Pick the word the best completes this sentence: The Crown will assume responsibility for all ________ for offences featuring on the Crown Prosecution Regulations Schedule, following the entry of a plea Cat 3 all JATs Jury Trials Cat 4 child
Jury Trials
Pick the word the best completes this sentence: The Crown will assume responsibility for all ______ offences after first appearance Cat 3 all JATs Jury Trials Cat 4 child
Cat 4
Time frames If there is a second appearance it will usually be within: 1. _____ working days after first appearance for Cat 1 or Cat 2 offence 2. _________ working days for Cat 3 or 4 offence
- 15
The prosecutor analyses the prosecution file within ____ days of a NG plea being entered a) 4b) 2c) 3d)14 e) 10
c) 3 days
Full disclosure must include:
Initial disclosure PLUS all other available, relevant info
If the prosecutor asks you for relevant info, you must ensure it is available to PPS no later that _____ working days before the case management discussion a) 3b) 7c) 5d) 14 e) 2
c) 5 working days
True or False? Case Review Hearings are always scheduled following a NG plea
True
Formal Statements: The Crown must file formal statements at the Case Review Hearing, but at least ______days before the trial call over a) 14b) 25 c) 21 d) 7 e) 5
b) 25
Under CPA, a statement can be recorded in any medium as long as a declaration is taken from the person making it that: 1. 2. What are the two conditions?
- The statement is true AND 2. The witness knows it will be used in court proceedings
The file must be returned to the prosecutor at least _____ working days before the trial
5
A notice of appeal must generally be filed within ____ working days
20
Once a trial and sentencing is complete , you need to do two things. What are they?
- Update the victim of the outcome of the trial 2. discuss any feedback from the prosecutor with your supervisor
True or False The CPA 2011 works the same in youth court
False. CPA will work differently in Youth Court cases so different processes will apply.
Why arrest? 3 options
Prevent further offences or destroying evidenceEnsure appearance before courtProtecting the persons own interests
A victim is…
A person against whom an offence is committedA person who suffers physical injury or loss/damage to property, through or by means of an offenseA parent or legal guardian of the aboveA member of the immediate family of a person who dies or is incapable
Who is responsible for filing FWS
The prosecutor. The OC prepares them
Explain evidentual test
By examining the sufficiency of the admissible evidence you must determine if there is a reasonable prospect of conviction
What are the 2 primary purposes of diversion?
• Rehabilitation - to prevent re-offending & encourage them to reflect on harm done to victim.• Reparation - payment of money, apology letter, repair damage done to property, make donation to approved charity group.
What are the 3 secondary purposes of diversion?
• Encourage offender to take responsibility for actions and show remorse• Eliminate factors that put them at risk of reoffending• Avoid their first conviction and give them another chance
Can you offer diversion if you have insufficient to charge?
• diversion is not an option if there is insufficient evidence to proceed with charge.
What happens if defendant does not complete diversion?
• If a charge has been laid and offender does not complete diversion, the charge can still proceed.• If offender reoffends while on diversion, they may no longer be suitable.
When is diversion appropriate?
• Entered a guilty plea but have not been convicted• Not entered a plea, but have acknowledged guilt and accepted full responsibility by admitting and showing remorse.• First time offender, so they can avoid conviction• In some cases it may be appropriate to offer diversion to persons with previous youth convictions, past convictions or previous diversion when:1. Current offending is caused by underlying problem likely to respond to counselling.2. Direct or indirect consequences of conviction would be out of proportion to the seriousness of the offence.3. The offender’s previous court outcomes were over five years ago• Summary offences or indictable offences that are triable summarily.• Traffic offences laid as a TON, such as careless, reckless.
When is diversion not appropriate?
• Recidivist offender• Offender who received diversion for similar offence in the past - except in exceptional circumstances• For a contested traffic infringement - as they are not admitting guilt or responsibility.• For a serious offence - unless circumstances and harm are at the bottom end of the scale• For purely indictable offences• All offences carrying a warning under the 3 strikes legislation• EBA offences
What must diversion conditions be? (3)
Conditions must be Proportionate, Achievable and Appropriate to the offence.
Can children and young persons be dealt with through the adult diversion scheme?
• CYP under 17 who are offenders should be dealt with under the CYPF Act 1989
What are some aggravating factors, that may prevent offender from getting diversion
• Offence was calculated and deliberate• Carried out by group• Against a public servant• Offender was ringleader• Conviction likely to result in significant penalty• Weapon or violence used• Abused position of trust• Victim vulnerable• Refuses to identify cooffenders• High prevalence of offence.• On bail, other charges pending• Previously received diversion for the same type of offence• 3 strike offence
Mitigating factors for diversion
• Arrest and time in custody sufficient deterrent• Misjudgement, coercion, vulnerable• Remorseful• Was ignorant to the law• Was provoked by victim• mental or physical illness• genuine mistake or misunderstanding• Conviction likely to result in nominal penalty
What is the Criminal Records Act 2004 “clean slate?”
• Individuals with less serious convictions who have been conviction free for (in most cases) at least seven years, to put their past behind them.
Which drug offences are/aren’t eligible for diversion?
Do not consider for Class A or B, however may consider for small amount of cannabis oil (B), needles, utensils, or cultivating cannabis (C)
Under the evidence act 2006, what is a ‘witness’?
EVIDENCE ACT 2006 S.4• ‘Witness’ means a person who gives evidence and is able to be cross-examined in a proceeding .
Define a ‘child complainant’:
Child complainant, in relation to any proceeding means a complainant who is a child when the proceeding commences.
What can judge do, on his own initiative or application of either party, in terms of giving evidence (S.103 Evidence Act)?
• In any proceeding the judge may, either of application of a party or on judges own initiative, direct witness to give evidence in chief and be cross examined in the ordinary way or in an alternative way as provided by S.105
What must the JUDGE have regard to?
- Fairness in the proceeding and that there is a fair trial,2. Need to minimise stress on witness and need to promote recovery of complainant of offence.
Who does this apply to (give evidence in alternate way)
1.age2. Disability, mental or physical2. Trauma (of the event).4. Linguistic or cultural barrier,5. Nature of proceeding or evidence to be given6.relationship of witness to offender,7. Absence from NZ
What must PROSECUTOR do, if person is giving evidence in an alternative way?
Must apply to court for direction on how child complainant give evidence
Under S.105 Evidence Act, what alternative ways can evidence be given?
• Witness in courtroom is unable to see defendant (Def can see witness unless judge directs otherwise in exceptional circumstances) “screening”.• From an appropriate place outside the courtroom• By a video record made before the hearing (in this case judge must give direction under s.103 as to manner of cross examination and re-examination of witness).
What does S.90 Evidence Act allow a witness to do before giving evidence
• S.90 Evidence Act - witness may refresh their memory from any signed statement made by them before giving evidence and entering court room. (Includes Police)
What must you advise witnesses in the courtroom?w
Must advise them not to talk to other witnesses about their evidence while waiting
Under S.168 Summary Proceedings Act, when must the prosecutor file formal written statements
• Must be filed together with exhibits referred to in the statements, no later than 42 days after:1. The date the defendant elects trial by jury 2. If the information is laid indictably, the date on which the def fist appears in court in relation to that information.
What is a ‘formal written statement’
• Purports to be signed by person making statement• Contains statement at end “everything is true and correct…”
If statement is made by person under 18, what must it contain
They must state how old they are in the statement
In regards to formal statements If person cannot read what should you do
• If person can’t read, read it to them, get them to sign it. Then attach signed statement to that statement stating person appeared to understand its contents.
Who can apply for an oral evidence order?
Either party (Defence or Prosecution) may apply to DC judge for order allowing oral examination at a committal hearing
On what grounds can apply for an oral evidence order?
Judge must be satisfied that the witness who provided the statement must be heard in order to prove there is sufficient evidence for a case or necessary in the interest of justice orPerson refused to make a formal written statement and is relevant to the charge
When must the application for oral evidence be made?
Application must be made no later than 14 days after the date on which the prosecutor is required to file written statements
Under the Bail Act 2000, everyone who is charged with an offence shall be……….
released on reasonable terms and conditions unless there is just cause for continued detention”.
Under S.7 who is bailable by right?
charged with an offence that is not punishable by imprisonment.or maximum punishment is less than 3 years.
A defendant who is bailable as of right must be released on reasonable terms and conditions unless…..
the offence is MAF/Assault child/Breach protection order.
Under S.8 (1) what must the Court consider before granting bail?
• Court must take into consideration whether Defendant is likely to• Fail to appear, interfere with witnesses or evidence, offend while on bail
Under S.8(2) what other considerations are made?
• Nature of the offence and whether it is a grave or less serious one of its kind:• Strength of the evidence and the probability of conviction or otherwise:• Seriousness of the punishment to which the defendant is liable, and the severity of the punishment that is likely to be imposed:• Character and past conduct or behaviour, in particular proven criminal behaviour, of the defendant:• History of offending while on bail, or breaching court orders, including orders imposing bail conditions:• Likely length of time before the matter comes to hearing or trial:• Possibility of prejudice to the defence in the preparation of the defence if the defendant is remanded in custody:
Under S.10, what are specified offences?
• section 128B (sexual violation):]• section 167 (murder):• section 168 (murder):• section 171 (manslaughter):• section 173 (attempt to murder):• section 188 (wounding with intent):• section 189 (injuring with intent):• section 191 (aggravated wounding or injury):• section 198A (using any firearm against law enforcement officer, etc):• section 198B (commission of crime with firearm):• section 234 (robbery):• section 235 (aggravated robbery).
Who does S.10 of the bail act apply to (specified offences)
• Applies to defendant of or over 17• Who is charged with a specified offence and who has 1 or more previous convictions for a specified offence
Who can grant bail to a person charged with a specified offence?
Only a High Court Judge or a District Court Judge.
In relation to S.10 bail act, what must the defendant satisfy the judge, in order to receive bail?
Defendant must satisfy the Judge on the balance of probabilities that he will not, while on bail or at large, commit any offence involving violence against, or danger to the safety of, any other person.
Under S.11, what other restriction exists in relation to specified offences? Who does this apply to?
• No defendant of or over 17 years who is found guilty of, or pleads guilty to, a specified offence• and who has 1 or more previous convictions for a specified offence (whether those convictions were for the same specified offence or for different specified offences)• may, while waiting to be sentenced or otherwise dealt with for the first-mentioned specified offence, be granted bail or allowed to go at large.
What restrictions to bail does section 12 provide? Who does this apply to?
If defendant is of or over 17 years and• (a) penalty carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years’ imprisonment; and• at the time of the offence was remanded at large or on bail awaiting trial for another offence that carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years’ imprisonment; and• at any time previously received a sentence of imprisonment OR(b)• The defendant is of or over 17 years and—• is charged with an offence that carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years’ imprisonment; and• has previously received 14 or more sentences of imprisonment and• has previously been convicted of an offence that was committed while the defendant was remanded at large or on bail and that carries a maximum sentence of 3 or more years.
Under S.12 The onus is on…………………..as to whether bail is/not granted.
Under section 12, the onus is on Defendant to prove to judge that bail should be granted.
What does section 15 say with regard to 17-20 year olds?
• (There is a presumption bail will be granted unless 10, 12 or 16 of Bail Act applies)• Can only be detained in prison if “no other course is desirable, having consideration to all the circumstances”.• In this case, seek guidance from an experienced youth aid officer.• Youth records are not convictions that count toward ‘specified offences’.
Under section 16 who can grant bail for a drug dealing offence?
• In any case, by order of a High Court Judge; or• If the defendant does not have any previous conviction for a drug dealing offence, by order of a District Court Judge.
What section is the power to grant police bail?
POWER TO GRANT POLICE BAIL S.21(1) Any Police employee may, if he or she considers it prudent to do so bail a person who—• is charged with an offence for which that person may be proceeded against summarily; and• has been arrested without warrant; and• cannot practicably be brought immediately before a court.
When should offenders be bailed to appear if given police bail
• Must be bailed no later than 7 days from the date of the bond, the person bailed attend personally before a court.• Bail is restricted if Def is K9’d under S.50 Domestic violence Act (breach protection order).
Who can Police NOT grant bail to?
Police Cannot Grant Bail when:• Def charged with specified offence and has a previous conviction for specified offence (S.10)• Restrictions apply under S.12• Defendant is charged with drug dealing offence• Charged with purely indictable offence• Arrested on a warrant
When a BOB occurs can police arrest without warrant? Enter private premises to make arrest?
• May be arrested without warrant in certain circumstancesNo power without warrant to enter private property to make arrest• No power to enter property to make bail check• (BOB is not an offence punishable by imprisonment)• A warrant under S.36 permits entry to any premises where there are RG for believing the defendant is on the premises
What pol form is an Op to Bail?
OP TO BAIL FORM - POL128
What is visual identification evidence?
an assertion by a person, based wholly or partly on what that person saw, to the effect that a defendant was present at or near a place where an act constituting direct or circumstantial evidence of the commission of an offence was done at, or about, the time the act was done; or(b) an account (whether oral or in writing) of an assertion of the kind described in paragraph(a)
If formal procedure for visual identification is followed, defendant must prove what?
S.45 places burden of proof on defendant, he must prove that the evidence was unreliable
If a formal visual identification procedure not followed, prosecution must prove what?
it must prove that the circumstances in which the identification was made have produced a reliable identification.
When should formal identification procedure be undertaken?
Procedure is to be undertaken asap after the alleged offence is reported to an officer of an enforcement agency.
What are the guidelines for a formal identification procedure?
• Done as soon as practicable after the alleged offence is reported• Person to be identified is compared to no fewer than 7 other persons who are similar in appearance and• No indication is given as to who among the persons in the procedure is the person to be identified; and• Person is informed that the person to be identified may or may not be among the persons in the procedure; and• That is the subject of a written record of the procedure actually followed that is sworn to be true and complete by the officer who conducted the procedure and provided to the Judge and the defendant (but not the jury) at the hearing;
What are good reasons for not following a formal identification procedure
• Suspect refuses to take part in procedure.• The singular appearance of the person to be identified• Substantial change in the appearance of the person to be identified• No officer involved could reasonably anticipate that identification would be an issue• ID of a person alleged to have committed an offence has been made to an officer of an enforcement agency soon after the offence was reported and in the course of that officer’s initial investigation:• Identification of a person alleged to have committed an offence has been made to an officer of an enforcement agency after a chance meeting between the person who made the identification and suspect
When voice identification is used, what must the prosecution prove?
The prosecution must prove on the balance of probabilities that the circumstances giving rise to the identification were reliable.
When must mandatory disclosure be made by?
Deadline asap but no later than 21 days from commencement of proceedings.
When does obligation for REQUESTED ADDITONAL disclosure commence?
• after a not guilty plea has been entered, trial by jury has been elected or first appearance on indictable charges• Deadline is preferably 14 days before next substantive hearing.
When does obligation for FULL disclosure commence?
• Starts after a not guilty plea for an offence (proceeded against summarily) is entered- deadline is 14 days before next substantive hearing.• After trial by jury is elected or first appearance on indictably laid charges - deadline is as soon as reasonably practicable.
When do ‘proceedings commence’?
“Commencement of Proceedings” means when summons is served or when defendant first appears in court following their arrest.
What is meant be the term ‘prosecutor’?
Prosecutor” is any police staff responsible for a file
What is meant by the term “relevance”
Relevance” - Info or an exhibit is ‘relevant’ if it tends to support or rebut, or has a material bearing on the case against the Defendant.
S.14(2) allows prosecutor to withhold information when?
Not relevantThe request appears frivolous or vexatiousIt may be withheld under S.15 - 18• S.15 - not in control or possession of the information;• S.16 - disclosure of the information is hlikely to prejudice the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences or disclosure of the information is likely to endanger the safety of any person• S.17 - it may lead to the identification or address of witness• S.18 - it would disclose a trade secret or prejudice commercial position
What does S.344C say about identification witnesses?
• Enables defendant to request info on a witness who has id’d him.• This is an exception to the rule that witnesses details are withheld• May request the name, address, any statements or identikit pictures the witness has made
When must a witnesses previous convictions be disclosed?
• Must be disclosed if relevant to the credibility of the witness• Convictions generally disclosed are perjury, attempting to pervert, assault or violence or dishonesty.• The Clean state Act doesn’t count and any historic relevant offences must be disclosed.
S.16 of the victims rights act restricts the disclosure of a persons address unless it is contained in………..
S.16 Victim’s Rights Act 2002 restricts disclosure of victims precise address, unless the address is contained in a charge (S.16A)
What may be the result of failing to disclose?
could see evidence excluded, case being dismissed, a retrial ordered.
What are the guidelines around inspection of exhibits?
Police must allow inspection of exhibits when• defence asks police to allow inspection• The exhibits are specified on the list of exhibits• Place may place conditions on this to ensure safety and integrity of exh.• May refuse inspection if the exh is being used for ongoing enforcement purposes and inspection would prejudice law enforcement.• Notify defence of how and when inspection will take place• Copy and disclose any exh that can be easily reproduced - like photos.• Police can refuse or restrict access in certain cases and defence not entitled as of right to test it - e.g. a blood stained shirt.
One of the principles laid down in the victims right act 2002 guides access to service for victims. In this respect police must inform victims that
they are entitled to access to welfare, health, medical or legal services
What must be ascertained early in an initial interview with a victim who has been assaulted?
the safety of the victim and the seriousness of the offence
When a victim elects to go on the VNR they will receive notification from different agencies. Match the agency with the type of information they hold about the offender status:NZ Parole BoardDepartment of Correction Ministry of HealthDepartment of Labour - if the offender escapes, dies, or is temporarily released - if the offender has an upcoming parole hearing - if the offender is not a NZ citizen and subject to deportation proposal - if the offender is entitled to the first unescorted leave or discharged.
Department of Correction - if the offender escapes, dies, or is temporarily releasedNZ Parole Board - if the offender has an upcoming parole hearing Department of Labour - if the offender is not a NZ citizen and subject to deportation proposalMinistry of Health - if the offender is entitled to the first unescorted leave or discharged
What are the police responsibilities to the victim when a section 29 suspect is released on bail?
police must advise the victim as soon as practicable, of the outcome and conditions of any bail application
When must a victim of a section 29 offence be advised of their right to be on the Victim Notification System (VNR)?
at the time of the offenders arrest
Victim Rights Act 2002 Section 29 offences are defined as
-sexual or serious assault resulting in injury, -death or being rendered incapable -leading to the victim having fears for their safety or the safety of their family.
Old Terminology: 1. Accused 2. Defended hearing 3. Informant 4. Information / indictment5. Lay charges 6. Summary / indictable
New Terminology 1. Defendant 2. Judge Alone Trial 3. Prosecutor 4. Charging document 5. File Charges 6. Categories of offences
5 Stages of Criminal proceedings
Commencement Administration Review Trial Disposition
Describe Commencement
Proceedings commence before the first appearance when either a charging document is filed or a defendant requests a hearing for an infringement notice.
Describe Administration
This stage involves the defendant making their first appearances in court, receiving disclosure, seeking legal advice, entering a plea
Describe Review
This stage will include the prosecutor and defence lawyer having an out of court case management discussion. This will usually be followed by a Case Review hearing, presided over by a Judge
Describe Trial
Now includes JAT as well as jury trial
Describe Disposition
Completion of prosecution and occurs in all cases, even if a trial has not occurred.
Category 1 offences
FINE ONLY Cat 1 offences are NOT punishable by imprisonment. In cat 1 matters: - The defendant can plead guilty by notice to the registrar - If the defendant pleads NG there will be a JAT in the district court - If the defendant does not appear when required, matter can proceed in the defendants absence
Category 2 offences
LESS THAN TWO YEARS IMPRISONMENT Cat 2 offences have a max penalty of 2 years or a community based sentence.In cat 2 matters: - Case management provisions apply - Any trial us a Judge Alone trial in the District Court
Category 3 offence
ALL OFFENCES NOT IN CAT 1,2, or 4 Cat 3 are punishable by at least 2 years imprisonment, and are not cat 4 offences. In cat 3 matters: - Case management provisions apply - The defendant has the right to elect trial by jury - The trial (JAT or Jury) may be in the District Court or High Court
Category 4 offence
THE MOST SERIOUS OFFENCES Cat 4 are the most serious; murder and manslaughter for example In Cat 4: - Case management provisions apply- The Crown is always the prosecutor - The trial is always a jury trial in the High Court
What are the two tests contained in the Solicitor General’s Prosecution Guidelines?
- Evidential Test 2. Public Interest test
Can a summons for a Cat 1 offence be served by post?Yes / No
Yes. BUT , not by electronic means like fax or email
A WTA in lieu of summons can only be issued if:
- A charging document has been filed AND - You have not been able to serve the summons
BAIL. If police bail conditions ARE imposed. The date of the hearing must be no more that ____ consecutive days from when the date bail was granted
7
BAIL. If police bail conditions are NOT imposed. The date of the hearing must be no more that ____ days from when the date bail was granted
14
What must an initial disclosure pack include?
- A copy of the charging document AND - A summary of facts AND - A QHA printout AND - a POL 2127 Initial Disclosure Record
which test is described in this statement:It is met if there is sufficient admissible evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction
The evidential test
The PPS will now conduct Jury trials for Cat 3 offences. TRUE or FALSE
FALSE
Where must proposed court bail conditions be recorded?
In the NIA charge module
Can 2 or more charges be heard together? Yes/ No
Yes
Can the charges against one defendant be heard together with the charges against another defendant? Yes/ No
Yes
True or false: There is automatic name suppression for child complainants and child witnesses
True
In what circumstance will the Crown take over prosecution for a Breach of Bail?
In cases where the Crown are already responsible for the charge that led to bail
Pick the word the best completes this sentence: The Crown will assume responsibility for all ________ for offences featuring on the Crown Prosecution Regulations Schedule, following the entry of a plea Cat 3 all JATs Jury Trials Cat 4 child
Jury Trials
Pick the word the best completes this sentence: The Crown will assume responsibility for all ______ offences after first appearance Cat 3 all JATs Jury Trials Cat 4 child
Cat 4
Time frames If there is a second appearance it will usually be within: 1. _____ working days after first appearance for Cat 1 or Cat 2 offence 2. _________ working days for Cat 3 or 4 offence
- 15
The prosecutor analyses the prosecution file within ____ days of a NG plea being entered a) 4b) 2c) 3d)14 e) 10
c) 3 days
Full disclosure must include:
Initial disclosure PLUS all other available, relevant info
If the prosecutor asks you for relevant info, you must ensure it is available to PPS no later that _____ working days before the case management discussion a) 3b) 7c) 5d) 14 e) 2
c) 5 working days
True or False? Case Review Hearings are always scheduled following a NG plea
True
Formal Statements: The Crown must file formal statements at the Case Review Hearing, but at least ______days before the trial call over a) 14b) 25 c) 21 d) 7 e) 5
b) 25
Under CPA, a statement can be recorded in any medium as long as a declaration is taken from the person making it that: 1. 2. What are the two conditions?
- The statement is true AND 2. The witness knows it will be used in court proceedings
The file must be returned to the prosecutor at least _____ working days before the trial
5
A notice of appeal must generally be filed within ____ working days
20
Once a trial and sentencing is complete , you need to do two things. What are they?
- Update the victim of the outcome of the trial 2. discuss any feedback from the prosecutor with your supervisor
True or False The CPA 2011 works the same in youth court
False. CPA will work differently in Youth Court cases so different processes will apply.
What is arrest?
Arrest is lawfully taking a person suspected of committing an offence into custody or temporarily taking their liberty away.
What are some of the reason you would arrest someone suspected of committing an offence?
- To safeguard the publics interest- Ensure the person appears in court- Protecting the persons own interest
When you arrest a person you must make it clear to that person that they are the person who is being arrested and make sure they understand. how can you do this?
Tell them that they have been arrested for (Offence) and advise them of their rights/caution and ether:- Formally touch the person on the shoulder, or- Have the person’s agreement to the arrest (e.g. they nod or walk towards the police car) or their submission to the arrest as a result of using force.
In some instances you will detain someone who is not being arrested. In these instances what should you do?
Explain to the person that they are detained and they are not free to go, give them their rights/caution.
What is arbitrary detention?
Arbitrary detention is when you arrest or detain someone and:- You do not have a legislative power to arrest or detain that person.- The arrest or detention is unreasonable or unnecessary in the particular case, or while the initial detention was appropriate, the detention continues for an unnecessarily long time.
When you have no power to detain someone you wish to question what should you do?
- If you have legislative power to, arrest them.- Give them clear advice that they do not have to stay and answer any questions before questioning them.If you hold anyone for questioning when you don’t have any power to do so this is arbitrary detention.
What could happen if you arbitrarily detain someone?
- Statements made by the person may be inadmissible in court- The case against the person could be dismissed- The arresting or detaining officer may be liable to civil litigation resulting in punitive damages
The power to arrest from the crimes act 1961 allows you to arrest someone when?
- You find someone disturbing the peace or committing an offence punishable by imprisonment- You have good cause to suspect the person has committed a breach of the peace or an offence punishable by imprisonment.
What are some way you can gain good cause to suspect an offence has occurred?
- Your own observations- Statements from witnesses- Admissions from the offender- Examining the crime scene- Forensic evidence
When dealing with an offender and you have identified they can be arrested, under what circumstances should you not arrest them?
- When they can be brought before the court by way of summons. If the offence is not imprisonable and there are no aggravating factors then a summons is more likely the better way of starting prosecution- When a warning, caution, counselling or referral to another agency is the best solution for the situation.
When you decide to summon someone instead of arrest what else should you consider doing?
Obtain the person’s identifying particulars, obtain their fingerprints and photographs as per the Policing act 2008.
If you have a power of arrest for an offender you have other associated powers. What are they?
- Use reasonable for making the arrest- Enter a premises to carry out the arrest- Stop and search vehicles in limited situations- Exercise warrantless search powers after arrest- Search and seize items being carried or in the person’s possession or control
Failure to advise an arrested or detained person of their rights using the correct caution could cause what to happen?
- A finding that the evidence obtained was improperly obtained and exclusion of the evidence- The case against the person being dismissed
When you arrest or detain a person what is your responsibility with regards to that persons welfare?
You are responsible for keeping them safe. You must protect them from self-harm and/or suicide or harm from others e.g. other people in police custody.
When you have arrested or detained someone when does their safety stop being your responsibility?
Until you have handed the custody of that person over to the custody officer, person in charge of the station, or any other employees taking over responsibility for the person’s custody.
What are your options for dealing with someone once you have arrested them and they are in police custody?
- Charge and hold them in for the next available court date- If bailable, you can charge and bail the person to a future court date, you have to have permission from the officer in charge of custody to do this.- Pre-charge warn the person if the relevant criteria is met.
There are some situations where you must immediately release a person from custody. What are these reasons?
- You discover there was no power of arrest- There is no longer reason to believe the person committed the offence- You believe the detention is no longer justified for whatever reason- The person arrested on a charge that does not proceed- The person is found not to be the person named in the arrest warrant
If an offence has been committed, and a warning is not appropriate, you must consider whether to commence prosecution. There are two steps required by the Solicitor-General’s Prosecution Guidelines to make this decision, what are they?
1 - The evidential test2 - Th public interest test
What are five factors to consider when determining the public interest?
- Seriousness of the offence- Likely penalty on conviction- The circumstances of the defendant- The likelihood of the offence being continued or repeated- The circumstances of the victim
When deciding which charge best fits the offending, what are four questions you can ask yourself to help figure out the most accurate charge?
- What did the suspect do?- What did the suspect intend to do?- What was the result of the suspects actions?- What is the appropriate charge?
What is arrest?
Arrest is lawfully taking a person suspected of committing an offence into custody or temporarily taking their liberty away.
What are some of the reason you would arrest someone suspected of committing an offence?
- To safeguard the publics interest- Ensure the person appears in court- Protecting the persons own interest
When you arrest a person you must make it clear to that person that they are the person who is being arrested and make sure they understand. how can you do this?
Tell them that they have been arrested for (Offence) and advise them of their rights/caution and ether:- Formally touch the person on the shoulder, or- Have the person’s agreement to the arrest (e.g. they nod or walk towards the police car) or their submission to the arrest as a result of using force.
In some instances you will detain someone who is not being arrested. In these instances what should you do?
Explain to the person that they are detained and they are not free to go, give them their rights/caution.
What is arbitrary detention?
Arbitrary detention is when you arrest or detain someone and:- You do not have a legislative power to arrest or detain that person.- The arrest or detention is unreasonable or unnecessary in the particular case, or while the initial detention was appropriate, the detention continues for an unnecessarily long time.
When you have no power to detain someone you wish to question what should you do?
- If you have legislative power to, arrest them.- Give them clear advice that they do not have to stay and answer any questions before questioning them.If you hold anyone for questioning when you don’t have any power to do so this is arbitrary detention.
What could happen if you arbitrarily detain someone?
- Statements made by the person may be inadmissible in court- The case against the person could be dismissed- The arresting or detaining officer may be liable to civil litigation resulting in punitive damages
The power to arrest from the crimes act 1961 allows you to arrest someone when?
- You find someone disturbing the peace or committing an offence punishable by imprisonment- You have good cause to suspect the person has committed a breach of the peace or an offence punishable by imprisonment.
What are some way you can gain good cause to suspect an offence has occurred?
- Your own observations- Statements from witnesses- Admissions from the offender- Examining the crime scene- Forensic evidence
When dealing with an offender and you have identified they can be arrested, under what circumstances should you not arrest them?
- When they can be brought before the court by way of summons. If the offence is not imprisonable and there are no aggravating factors then a summons is more likely the better way of starting prosecution- When a warning, caution, counselling or referral to another agency is the best solution for the situation.
When you decide to summon someone instead of arrest what else should you consider doing?
Obtain the person’s identifying particulars, obtain their fingerprints and photographs as per the Policing act 2008.
If you have a power of arrest for an offender you have other associated powers. What are they?
- Use reasonable for making the arrest- Enter a premises to carry out the arrest- Stop and search vehicles in limited situations- Exercise warrantless search powers after arrest- Search and seize items being carried or in the person’s possession or control
Failure to advise an arrested or detained person of their rights using the correct caution could cause what to happen?
- A finding that the evidence obtained was improperly obtained and exclusion of the evidence- The case against the person being dismissed
When you arrest or detain a person what is your responsibility with regards to that persons welfare?
You are responsible for keeping them safe. You must protect them from self-harm and/or suicide or harm from others e.g. other people in police custody.
When you have arrested or detained someone when does their safety stop being your responsibility?
Until you have handed the custody of that person over to the custody officer, person in charge of the station, or any other employees taking over responsibility for the person’s custody.
What are your options for dealing with someone once you have arrested them and they are in police custody?
- Charge and hold them in for the next available court date- If bailable, you can charge and bail the person to a future court date, you have to have permission from the officer in charge of custody to do this.- Pre-charge warn the person if the relevant criteria is met.
There are some situations where you must immediately release a person from custody. What are these reasons?
- You discover there was no power of arrest- There is no longer reason to believe the person committed the offence- You believe the detention is no longer justified for whatever reason- The person arrested on a charge that does not proceed- The person is found not to be the person named in the arrest warrant
If an offence has been committed, and a warning is not appropriate, you must consider whether to commence prosecution. There are two steps required by the Solicitor-General’s Prosecution Guidelines to make this decision, what are they?
1 - The evidential test2 - Th public interest test
What are five factors to consider when determining the public interest?
- Seriousness of the offence- Likely penalty on conviction- The circumstances of the defendant- The likelihood of the offence being continued or repeated- The circumstances of the victim
When deciding which charge best fits the offending, what are four questions you can ask yourself to help figure out the most accurate charge?
- What did the suspect do?- What did the suspect intend to do?- What was the result of the suspects actions?- What is the appropriate charge?
