02. The Hard Stuff Flashcards
Deadlines in Rule-Governed Behavior
The deadline marks when the SD period ends. The time after the deadline is the S(Delta)
Rule-Governed Behavior
A way that people’s behavior comes under the control of consequences that are too delayed to influence behavior directly (in written format)
Examples of Rule-Governed Behavior
Preparing for a baby
Studying for a big test
Equivalence Class
A set of arbitrary stimuli that don’t need to have common physical properties (.5, 1/2, half)
Transivity
The final and critical test for stimulus equivalence. (Person makes a direct jump without learning
Transivity Example
A=B relation –> Baby picture = Baby word
B=C relation –> Baby word = Saying “Baby”
A=C Automatic relation of Baby picture and Saying “Baby”
Stimulus Equivalence
The emergence of accurate responding to untrained and non-reinforced stimulus-stimulus relations following the reinforcement of responses to other stimulus-stimulus relations.
Identity Matching-to-Sample
When the sample and the comparison stimuli are physically identical
Symbolic Matching-to-Sample
When the relation between the sample and comparison stimuli is arbitrary.
Matching-to-Sample
Selecting a comparison stimulus corresponding to a sample stimulus (Reinforcing only when the client makes a correct match)
Simple Discrimination
An antecedent evokes or abates the behavior
Conditional Discrimination
Circumstances under which the discrimination is appropriate (asking for various items through PECS in different conditions)
Conditional Discrimination Example
Similar gestures in different countries serve different meanings.
Concept
Requires an individual being able to discriminate between what is included and excluded from a stimulus class to form a concept. (stimulus generalization and stimulus discrimination)
Generalization Gradient
A graph that shows the extent to which a behavior that has been reinforced in the presence of a specific stimulus condition is emitted in the presence of other stimuli
CHECK FOR: Flat slope: Little stimulus control, Increasing Slope: More stimulus control
Stimulus Discrimination
Occurs when new stimuli do not evoke the same response as the controlling stimulus.
Stimulus Generalization
When the same type of behavior that has a history of reinforcement tends to be evoked by stimuli that share similar physical properties with the controlling antecedent stimulus. (Ex: Mom in the presence of other adult women)
Discriminative Stimulus (SD)
A stimulus in the presence of which responses have been reinforced and in the absence of which the same type of responses have occurred and not been reinforced in the past.
Motivating Operation (MO)
Something that changes the value of a stimulus as a reinforcer (related to differential reinforcing effectiveness) and effects the current frequency of the behavior
Stimulus Delta S(Delta)
A Stimulus in the presence of which a given behavior has not produced reinforcement in the past (not always 0 reinforcement)
Overshadowing
The presence of one stimulus interferes with the acquisition of stimulus control by another stimulus.
Masking
A competing stimulus can block the evocative function of that stimulus even though a stimulus has acquired stimulus control
Pre-Attending Skills
The ability to look at the instructor or materials, listen to directions, sit quietly.
Must be taught before stimulus control.
Stimulus Salience
Prominence of the stimulus in person’s the person’s environment. Increased Salience makes things easier to learn
Stimulus Control
When the rate/frequency, latency, duration, or amplitude of a response is altered in the presence of an antecedent stimulus. (Acquired when responses are reinforced).
Extinction
A procedure that occurs when a previously reinforced response is discontinued, so that the behavior decreases in the future.
Possible Unwanted Effects of Extinction
Extinction Bursts
Extinction induced aggression
Difficult to use on clients who rarely display target bx.
Difficult to know what the reinforcer is for the bx
Difficult in maintaining reinforcement (peer attention)
Danger in ignoring challenging behaviors
Challenging behaviors may be imitated by others
Procedural Extinction
Ignoring (NOT THE SAME AS PLANNED IGNORING)
Functional Extinction
Withholding maintaining reinforcement
Extinction Type (Positive Reinforcement)
Is the function of the an individual’s behavior is attention, then ignoring is the correct form of extinction
Extinction Type (Automatic Reinforcement)
Mask or remove sensory consequence (gloves for scratching)
Extinction Type (Negative Reinforcement)
Individual cannot escape aversive situation
Reasons for Resistance to Extinction (6)
- Long history of reinforcement
- Intermittent schedules of reinforcement
- High quality reinforcement
- Large amount of reinforcement
- response requiring little effort
- Number of previous extinction trials.
Types of Extinction (PAN)
Positive Reinforcement
Automatic Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
Spontaneous Recovery
The behavior that diminished during the extinction process reoccurs even though the behavior does not produce reinforcement (not an indication that the extinction procedure was ineffective)
Operant Extinction
Involves withholding reinforcement when the behavior occurs
Respondent Extinction
Involves the un-pairing of a conditioned stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus
Stimulus Discrimination Training
A procedure in which responses are reinforced in the presence of one stimulus condition, but not in the presence of the other S(Delta)
3 Parts to Stimulus Equivalence (RST)
Reflexivity (A=A)
Symmetry (A=B, B=A)
Transivity (A=B, B=C, A=C)
Noncontingent Reinforcement is NOT Extinction
Both reduce behaviors, but extinction diminishes behavior by changing the consequence. NCR is an antecedent intervention
Response Blocking is NOT Extinction
Response blocking prevents the response from occuring, but with extinction the individual can still produce the respond, but the behavior is not producing reinforcement.
Verbal Analog Conditioning
Verbal pairing procedure where previously neutral stimuli can become conditioned punishers or reinforcers for humans without direct pairing (children’s moral stories)
Generalized Conditioned Punishers
A type of conditioned punisher that has been paired with many unconditioned punishers (can be punishing all the time - reprimands or social disapproval)
Conditioned Punishers
A previously neutral stimulus change that functions as a punisher because of prior pairing with one or more punishers (neutral tone paired with electric shock)
Unconditioned Punishers
A stimulus change that decreases the frequency of any behavior that immediately precedes it regardless of the organism’s previous learning history of that stimulus. (hot temperature, extremely loud noise)
Behavioral Contrast
A phenomenon that occurs when one component of a multiple schedule increases or decrease the rate or responding that is accompanied by a change in response rate on the other, unaltered schedule.
Environment
Complex, dynamic universe of events that differs from instance to instance
Behavior
Large set/class of responses that share physical dimensions of functions
Response
A single instance of behavior
Response Cost
Loss of a specific amount of reinforcement contingent on a behavior
Automatic Punishment
Punishment that occurs independent of the social mediation of others
Negative Automatic Punishment Example
You wear an itchy sweater, in the future, you don’t wear the sweater.
Positive Automatic Punishment Example
You wear a rubber band around your wrist and smack yourself with it whenever you says a curse word.
Automatic Reinforcement
Reinforcement that occurs independent of the social mediation of others. Other people do not deliver the consequence
Negative Automatic Reinforcement Example
Scratching an insect bite