Zimbardo's Research Flashcards
what was the aim of Zimbardo’s research?
the extent to which ordinary students conformed to the roles of prison guards and prisoners (social roles)
where was the mock prison set up in?
Stanford University
how many ppts are in Zimbardo’s research?
24 of the most stable male volunteers (signed up from an advert)
how were the ppts allocated to either prisoner or guard?
random allocation
how much were ppts paid?
$15 per day
what was Zimbardo’s role in the experiment?
prison superintendent
what was the role of the prisoners?
- referred to by their numbers
- follow rules
what was the role of the guards?
- enforce the rules
what happened on day 1 in ZImbardo’s research?
one prisoner was released by choice
what happened on day 2 in ZImbardo’s research?
- prisoners rebelled and the guards would retaliate with harsher treatments
- prisoners became subdued, depressed and anxious
what happened on day 4 in ZImbardo’s research?
- 2 prisoners leave
- 1 prisoner begins a hunger strike, the guards attempted to force feed him and he was put in a hole. This prisoner was shunned by other prisoners
what happened on day 6 in ZImbardo’s research?
research was stopped (it was meant to be 14 days)
what is the conclusion of Zimbardo’s research?
- simulation revealed the power of situation to influence people’s behaviour
- guards, prisoners and even Zimbardo conformed to their social roles
what type of experiment was Zimbardo’s experiment?
field experiment
how were the participants of Zimbardo’s experiment chosen?
- an advert was placed in the newspaper asking for male volunteers and Zimbardo psychologically evaluated these volunteers
how was the start of the experiment?
- there was a slow start to the experiment but the guards became increasingly tyrannical in response to the prisoners misbehaviours
what is a weakness of Zimbardo’s research(R)?
- lacks realism to a true prison
- Banuazizi and Movahedi argued ppts were merely play-acting rather than actually conforming to their social roles
- ppts performance = based on stereotypes of how prisoners and guards are supposed to behave
- e.g. one guard had said that they based their role on a brutal character from Cool Hand Luke, which explains why the prisoners rioted because that’s why real prisoners would have done
- findings tell us little about conformity to social roles in real prisons
what is a strength of Zimbardo’s research(C)?
- Z and colleagues had control over key variable
- e.g selection of ppts (emotionally stable and they were randomly allocated to role of prisoner or guard)
- one way that researchers ruled out individual personality differences as an explanation of findings
- if guards and prisoners behaved very differently, their behaviour must be due to the role
- control over variables, increases internal validity of study, we can be much more confident in drawing conclusions about influence of social roles on conformity
what is a weakness of Zimbardo’s research(E)?
deemed as unethical
what is a weakness of Zimbardo’s research?
- may have exaggerated the power of social roles in influencing behaviour(Fromm)
- only 1/3 of guards actually behaved in brutal manner
- 1/3 tried to apply rules fairly
- rest actively tried to help and support prisoners, offered them cigs, sympathised and reinstated privileges
- most guards were able to resist the situational privileges to conform to brutal role
-minimised influence of dispositional factors