Milgram's Research Flashcards

1
Q

what is the aim of Milgram’s research?

A

investigate how far people would be prepared to go in obeying an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where was Milgram’s study set?

A

Yale University

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many participants in Milgram’s research?

A

40 American men volunteered to take part in a study on learning and memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the method of Milgram’s research?

A
  • ppt was introduced to a confederate pretending to be another ppt
  • ppts drew lots to be either teacher or learner (fixed so ppt always got teacher)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did the experimenter ask the teacher to do?

A

test learners on word pairs and deliver an electric shock for every mistake made by learner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the range of shocks?

A

15V to 450V (15V intervals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what did the learner do?

A
  • the learners answered were pre-recorded
  • at around 300V the learner would grunt and pound the wall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what would happen if the ppt hesistated to continue?

A

experimenter would give 4 prods (e.g. the experiment requires you to continue) if the ppt hesitated to continue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what voltage did all ppts go to?

A

300V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what % of ppts continued to the maximum of 450V?

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the variations of Milgram’s research (situational variables)?

A
  • location
  • proximity
  • uniform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how was the method altered for location?

A

was originally done in Yale lab (prestigious university) to a run down office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how did the results alter for location?

A

obedience decreased to 47.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how was the method altered for proximity and what were the results?

A
  • teacher and learner were in the same room - 40%
  • teacher had to force learner’s hand onto the plate to receive the electric shock - 30%
  • experimenter left the room and gave instructions to teacher by telephone - 20.5%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how was the method altered for uniform?

A

experimenter who wore lab coat was taken away due to phone call and role of experimenter was played by a member of the public who wore everyday clothes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how did the results alter for uniform?

A

obedience decreased to 20%

17
Q

what is obedience?

A

acting in response to a direct order from authority

18
Q

what were the results of Milgram’s study?

A
  • all participants delivered a shock of 300V
  • 65% of ppts went to the maximum of 450V
  • ppts were distressed, trembling and sweating
19
Q

what is a strength of Milgram’s research(replicated)?

A
  • Milgram’s findings were replicated in French documentary made about a reality TV show
  • Beauvois et al = focused on game show, puts beloved that they were contestants in pilot episode of Game of Death
  • paid to give electric shocks to other ppts in front of live audience
  • 80% of ppts delivered maximum shock of 460V to apparently unconscious man
  • behaviour of ppts was identical to Milgrams, e.g. nail biting
    = increases validity
20
Q

what is a weakness of Milgram’s research(validity)?

A
  • low internal validity
  • 75% of ppts said they believes stocks were genuine
  • Orne and Holland = ppts behaved as they did as they didn’t really believe in the set up, so play acted
  • Perry = listened to tapes of Milgram’s ppts and reported only about half believed shocks were real
  • 2/3 of ppts were disobedient
    = ppts may be responding to demand characteristics, lowers internal validity
21
Q

what is weakness of Milgram’s research(blind)?

A
  • Milgram’s conclusions about blind obedience may not be justified
  • Haslam et al = ppts obeyed when experimenter delivered 3 verbal prods
  • ppts who were given 4th prod, you have no there choice, you have to continue) disobeyed
  • SLT = ppts only obeyed when they identified with the scientific aims of research
  • when orders to blindly obey authority they refused
    = SLT move valid