Year 1 Chapter 2 Memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain what is meant by the term coding in terms of memory

A

Once information gets into the memory system it is encoded in different ways. This process is called coding.
STM is coded acoustically (by sound)
LTM is coded semantically (by meaning)
Baddeley (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain what is meant by the term capacity in relation to memory

A

This is the amount of information that can be stored in the memory at one time.
Miller (1956) found the STM to be 7+/- items
It was also found that the LTM is potentially unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain what is meant by the term duration in relation to memory

A

Duration is the length of time that information can be stored in memory
Peterson and peterson (1959) found the STM has a duration of roughly 30 seconds
Bahrick (1975) found that the LTM has a potentially unlimited duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline one research study into coding of STM. Include what the researchers did and what they found

A

Baddeley (1966)
Procedure-
Different lists of words were given to PTTs to remember
Acoustically similar, Acoustically dissimilar, Semantically similar and Semantically dissimilar.
Findings-
PPTs found that acoustically similar words were hard to recall
Conclusion-
Suggests that information is coded acoustically in STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline one way in which psychologist have investigated the duration of short-term memory

A
  • Peterson and Peterson (1959)
    • Procedure
      • PPts were given nonsense trigrams to remember and were asked to count backwards from different amounts of time
    • Findings
      • After 3 seconds 90% remembered
      • After 18 seconds 3% recalled correctly
    • Conclusion
      • STM lasts for 30 seconds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Briefly evaluate research into the duration of short-term memory

A
  • Meaningless stimuli
    - The material used was artificial and so doesn’t represent real life
    • Study lacks external validity (not generalisable to real life)
    • Forgetting can be explained
      • Spontaneous decay - if information is not rehearsed the memory trace simply disappears
      • Displacement - new information takes the place of the old information due to the limited capacity of the STM
    • Peterson and Peterson study, the counting in reverse could’ve lead to the replacement of the information
    • This means that the study lacks internal validity, as it was not duration of memory being tested, but was in fact displacement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Briefly evaluate research into the capacity of STM

A
  • Initial study lacks validity
    • Study was done so long ago and early studies often lacked control
      • Other studies have been done since to reconfirm Jacobs study
    • STM may have been overestimated
      • Cowen (2001) found that the STM is only around 5 chunks
      • Miller’s lower estimate is more accurate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the Multistore model of memory

A

-Atkinson and Shiffin (1968)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name 2 methods by which information is moved through the multistore model of memory

A
  • Attention

- Rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline 1 piece of supporting evidence for the separate nature of the memory stores (MSM)

A
  • Baddeley (1966)
    • Study on coding - found that the STM codes acoustically and the LTM semantically
    • Shows that the 2 types of memory are different entities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criticise the multistore memory model, use case studies in your answer

A
  • Shallice and Warrington
    • KF - poor STM for auditory information but unimpaired for visual
    • Suggests that the STM is not just one store, at least one for auditory and another for visual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain finding from Craik and Watson and why these challenge the MSM

A
  • The MSM assumes that the more rehearsal you do the better/the more likely information is to pass into the LTM
    • However, Craik and Watson disagreed with this idea and said there are in fact 2 types of rehearsal
    • Maintenance rehearsal keeps things in the STM. Elaborative rehearsal is more important for the LTM
    • THis challenges the MSM as the model doesn’t consider that there is more than one type of rehearsal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Research by Tulving has further been used to criticize the MSM. Why is this?

A
  • Tulving proposed the existence of multiple types of long term memory
    • This is a problem for the MSM as it sees the LTM as a unitary store
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who first proposed the idea of different types of long term memory and why?

A
  • Tulving
    - Realized that the LTM proposed was too simplistic and inflexible
    • Proposed that instead there were three different types of stores
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the nature of the episodic memory

A
  • Events from our lives
    - They are time stamped- we know when these events took place
    • The memory of an episode will involve many elements to make it complete
    • You have to make a conscious effort to recall them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the nature of semantic memory

A
  • Contains our knowledge of the world, in the broadest concepts (e.g. knowledge of concepts or the taste of an orange)
    • These memories aren’t time stamped. These memories are less personal and more about facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the nature of procedural memory

A
  • our memory of actions and skills
    • these are the sort of skills we would find difficult to explain to others or that get harder when you try to describe them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline the supporting evidence for the different types of LTM

A
  • Clinical evidence
    - HM and Clive Wearing both suffer from amnesia
    - HM displayed normal functions of his semantic memory (e.g. he understood what a dog was), but impaired function of his episodic memory (e.g. he couldn’t remember if he’d ever owned a dog)
    - Clive Wearing was a professional musician and could play the piano, but he couldn’t remember having learnt to play the piano
    - Both these showcase different types of long term memory
    • Neuroimaging evidence
      • Tulving used PET scans to show where in the brain different forms of LTM are stored
      • Semantic memories: Left frontal cortex
      • Episodic memories: right frontal cortex
      • This supports Tulving’s theory as it shows physical differences in where memories are stored
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Outline the problem with clinical evidence for different types of LTM

A
  • Lack of control in the studies (e.g. cannot control the precise location of the brain damage)
    • Also it’s impossible to determine the nature of these people’s memory before the damage, also leading to a lack of control in the studies
    • These factors make it difficult to generalize information found in such case studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the working memory model?

A
  • A model of how the STM functions (devised by Baddely and Hitch 1974)
    • Concerned with the parts of the mind that is active when we are temporarily storing and manipulating information
    • Broken down into 4 parts each different, especially in terms of coding and capacity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Briefly outline the Working Memory Model

A
  • Central executive - Monitors incoming information and allocates it to slave systems; makes decisions; very limited capacity
    • Phonological loop - Deals with auditory information and preserves word order. Divided into two sub systems; The phonological store (stores words) and Articulatory process (allows for rehearsal)
    • Visuo-spatial sketch pad - Stores visual and spatial information as required. It’s split into the inner cache (Stores visual information) and inner scribe (records arrangement of objects)
    • Episodic buffer - Temporary storage and integration of visual, verbal and spatial information. Time stamps. Linked to LTM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Briefly outline one research study into WMM using dual task performance

A
  • Baddely et al (1975)
    • Showed that PPTs had more difficulty doing two visual task (tracking a light and describing the letter F) than doing a verbal and visual task
    • The increased difficulty is due to the task taking up the same slave system
    • Must be a different slave system to process visual and verbal information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Outline some clinical evidence for the WMM

A
  • Shallice and Warrington
    • Case study KF
    • poor STM for verbal information but unaffected STM for visual
    • The phonological loop had been damaged but the other slave systems were fine
    • Suggests the existence of separate stores
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Cognitive psychologist argue that one part of the WMM is unsatisfactory and doesn’t really explain anything. Explain this point

A
  • Critics have suggested the the central executive lacks clarity
    • Baddeley states this is the most important part of the model yet the least understood some psychologist believe it consists of several different components
    • WMM has not been fully explained and needs more research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Outline the evidence from brain scans for the WMM

A
  • Braver et al (1997)
    • Gave PPTs tasks to occupy the central executive while they underwent brain scans
    • An area in the prefrontal cortex lit up, the more taxed the CE the brighter it was
    • Supports the idea that different memory functions are located in different areas of the brain and supports the models prediction that the CE will have to work harder when more demand is placed on it (shown by the increased activity)
26
Q

What is interference in terms of forgetting?

A
  • Occurs when two pieces of information conflict with each other
    • Occurs mainly in the LTM
    • Interference between memories makes it harder to recall them resulting in forgetting
27
Q

Outline the two types of interference as explanations for forgetting

A
  • Proactive interference
    - Old memories interfere with new ones
    • Retroactive interference
      • New memories affecting old
    • PO-RN
28
Q

Outline one study that investigates interference as an explanation for forgetting

A
  • McGeoch and McDonald
    • Gave PPTs lists of 10 words to memorise and then gave them a new list - 6 groups with 6 different types of lists
    • Recall of the original list depended on the second list
    • The PPTs with the most similar lists recalled them the worst, suggesting that interference is worst when the materials are similar
29
Q

Outline one strength of interference theory

A
  • Thousands of studies all with similar results
    - Shows that the experiments are repeatable
    - Increase reliability and credibility of the theory
30
Q

Outline two limitations of interference theory

A
  • Lab studies use very artificial tasks
    - The use of artificial tasks makes interference much more likely in the lab than real life
    • The time between learning and recall is very short in the lab studies
      • In real life these things are learnt over a period of months
      • The more time between learning and recall the less likely interference is
    • Research may be over estimating the importance of interference
31
Q

Outline one study that has investigated interference in the real world

A
  • Baddeley and Hitch
    • Tested to see if rugby’s players memories of opponents faced was dependent on time since the game or how many games since
    • Finding - Memory of a game was dependent on how many matches had been played since the game
    • Supports the idea of interference and shows it’s applicable to at least some real life situations
32
Q

Briefly describe what is meant by retrieval failure

A
  • Forgetting occurs due to lack of sufficient cues

- Cues are stored at the same time as the memory

33
Q

Outline the encoding specificity principle

A
  • Introduced by Tulving
    • Cues help us to retrieve data
    • Cues that were present at encoding have to be present at retrieval
    • If cues are absent then there will be some forgetting
    • Cues can be both meaningful and meaningless
34
Q

Outline research study that investigated context-dependent forgetting

A
  • Godden and Baddeley
    • On land and underwater
    • 4 conditions
    • Learned on land = best recall on land and vice versa
35
Q

Baddeley (1997) argues that context effects are actually not strong, especially in real life. Explain this and what it means for context-dependent forgetting

A
  • Studies uses context that are very different
    • In real life contexts are never going to be different
    • Studies don’t tell us about how memory works in real world
36
Q

Outline one study that investigated state-dependent forgetting

A
  • Carter and Cassaday
    • Antihistamines and not
    • 4 conditions
    • Learned with antihistamines = best recall with antihistamines and vice versa
37
Q

Name one strength of research into retrieval failure

A
  • A range of supporting evidence

- Shows that the theory is valid and provides credibility

38
Q

Explain the problem with the encoding specificity principle

A
  • Theoretical
    • Can’t provide proof - untestable concepts
    • Built on assumptions - if recall was good we assume cue is present
    • Not falsifiable = unscientific
39
Q

A criticism of the theory of retrieval failure is the effect may be related to the way it’s tested. Explain this

A
  • Baddeley (1980)
    • Repeated the underwater study but used recognition test instead of recall
    • There was no context dependent forgetting
    • Cues only affect memory is it’s tested in a certain way
40
Q

Explain what is meant by the term misleading information

A
  • Incorrect information given to a witness, usually after the event
    • It can take many forms such as leading questions or post-event discussions
41
Q

Explain what is meant by the term leading questions. Use an example in your answer

A
  • A question that suggest, due to the way it’s phrased, a specific answer
    • For example “was the man holding the knife in his left hand?” this suggests that he was in fact holding the knife in his left hand
42
Q

Briefly outline one study that has investigated leading questions as a factor in the accuracy of eye witness testimony. Include what the researchers did and what they found in your answer

A
  • Loftus and Palmer
    • They shew participants a video of a car crash
    • They asked the participants about the speed of the car, each group was asked using a different verb (e.g. bumped, smashed, hit ect)
    • The more aggressive the verb used the higher the estimated speed was
    • Leading question had an impact on recall
43
Q

Outline one explanation for leading questions as a factor affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

A
  • The response bias explanation
    - The wording has no effect on memory but alters how the witness words the answer
    • The substitution explanation
      • The wording actually alters the memory
44
Q

Briefly outline one study that looked into the effects of post-event discussion as a factor in eyewitness testimonies. Include what the researchers did and what they found in your answer

A
  • Gabber et al
    • Gave participant pairs videos to watch
    • Both partners saw the crime for different angles (they saw parts the other did not)
    • Afterwards the partners were allowed to discuss what they had seen
    • 71% of participants recalled information they had not seen
    • Witnesses go along with each other –> memory conformity
45
Q

Explain why it might be better to conduct research into eyewitness testimony in the real world rather than a lab

A
  • Lab studies do not replicate the stress people feel in real world crimes
    • Stress and anxiety have been shown to have an effect on recall
    • Conducting eyewitness studies in a lab tells us nothing about real life because the setting and materials are artificial
46
Q

Outline some research into individual differences in eyewitness testimony

A
  • Factors such as age affect recall
    • Anastasi and Rhodes found that younger age groups had more accurate recall than older age groups
    • The study found that people are always better at recognizing people their own age
    • Studies often use younger people as the target and so some age groups appear to have less accurate recall than they actually do
47
Q

A strength of eyewitness testimony research is it’s useful real world applications - explain this

A
  • Consequences of inaccurate eyewitness testimonies in real life can be devastating
    • Research into eyewitness testimony has lead to a change in the way police officers question people to avoid the distorting effect of misleading information
    • research into this can improve the legal system an increase the chances of eyewitnesses giving sound information
48
Q

Give two reasons why lab research into eyewitness testimonies may be inaccurate

A
  • Lack of consequences
    - Participants usually know they are taking part in a study
    - They know that no matter how horrific or serious the incident their answer will have no consequences
    - This is not the case in real life, leading questions may have less of an effect on people in real life
    • Demand characteristics
      • Zaragosa and McGloskey (1989)
      • Argue that answers given in lab studies are largely due to demand characteristics
      • Participants do not want to let the researchers down (or influence the results) and so lie (if they do not know the answer)
      • There is the danger that participants wont behave how we want them to, i.e. naturally. When this happens it decreases the validity of the research because they’re no longer measuring the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
49
Q

Outline research by Johnson and Scott into the effect of anxiety on eyewitness testimony

A
  • Decreased recall ability
    • Johnson and Scott (1976) - Weapon focus effect
    • After an argument participants were less able to identify a person if they walked past holding a bloody knife than a pen with ink on their hands
    • Anxiety increases recall accuracy
50
Q

Outline one piece of research showing that anxiety doesn’t always have to negative affect eyewitness testimony

A
  • Increases recall
    • Yuille and Cutshall (1986) - witness to a bank robbery
    • Witness who experience the highest level of stress provided the most accurate recall
    • Anxiety increases recall accuracy
51
Q

There are times when anxiety has had a positive effect on anxiety and other times when it has had a negative effect. How can this be explained?

A
  • Yerkes-dodson law - relationship between emotional arousal and performance is an inverted-U
    • Deffenbacher applied to memory and eyewitness testimony - lower levels of anxiety produced lower levels of recall but as anxiety increased so did recall
    • After anxiety reached a certain level recall fell drastically
52
Q

Is the inverted-U theory a good one, or has it been criticised?

A
  • Anxiety is very difficult to define and measure, with many different aspects - cognitive, behavioural, physical, emotional
    • The Yerkes-Dodson law only focusses on one of these elements
    • Other elements are however just as important - e.g. cognitive factors - the way we think about an event has also been shown to affect our recall of it
    • It is an incomplete and reductionist explanation
53
Q

Critics have suggested that the weapon focus effect may in fact not be relevant, as it may not be testing anxiety. Explain this, and refer to one study in your answer

A
  • Could be surprise rather than anxiety that draws the attention of witness thereby reducing recall
    • Pickle et al (1998) - used scissors, gun, wallet and raw chicken as the handheld items in a hair salon (scissors aren’t unusual in a salon)
    • Recall will much less in the chicken condition - high unusualness - low recall
54
Q

Describe why demand characteristics are an issue in lab studies of anxiety

A
  • Most studies show participants a film of a crime (usually staged) - so participants are aware they are part of study
    • Most of them will be able to work out for themselves they are going to be ask questions about what they have seen
    • This could make their responses more accurate because they want to be helpful or less accurate because they want to undermine the research
55
Q

Are there any ethical issues when studying the effect of anxiety on eyewitness testimony?

A
  • Creating anxiety is risky - psychological harm
    • Real life studies may be more beneficial - raises the question of whether or not we actually need lab studies
    • However they are good as a comparison to the less controlled field studies - the benefits may outweigh the costs
56
Q

Name and describe 4 stages of cognitive interview

A
  • Report everything
    - Include every single detail of the event - seemingly trivial details could be important and could trigger other memories
    • Reinstate context
      • Returns to the crime scene in their mind (environment, sense ect) and emotion - context-dependent forgetting
    • Change of perspective
      • Recall the event from the perspective of other people (e.g. witness or perpetrator) - disrupts expectations and schemata
57
Q

What is meant by the enhanced cognitive interview

A
  • Fisher et al (1987)
    • Additional elements to focus on the social dynamics of the interaction
    • E.g. knowing when to establish eye-contact and when to relinquish it
    • Reducing anxiety, minimising distractions, speaking slowly, using open ended questions
58
Q

Many police forces are reluctant to use the cognitive interview. Why is this?

A
  • The CI is time consuming when compared to the standard interview
    • More time is needed to establish rapport and allow them to relax
    • CI also requires special training - forces may not have been able to provide more than a couple of hours of training
    • It is unlike the proper version of the CI is actually used - explains why police have been unimpressed
59
Q

Outline research that supports the effectiveness of the enhanced cognitive interview

A
  • Kohnken et al (1999) combine data from 50 studies - meta-analysis
    • The enhanced cognitive interview consistently provided more correct information than the standard interview
    • There are real practical benefits to using enhanced cognitive interview - gives the police a better chance of catching criminals
60
Q

Why is it difficult to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the cognitive interview

A
  • Variations are used in every study
    • Different techniques and the enhanced cognitive interview
    • If a research study evaluates the effectiveness of one version of cognitive interview, then the findings may not apply when it is used differently by a different police force
    • This makes it very difficult to compare the ways cognitive interview is used. It also makes it easier for police officers to reject it because they could argue, “it’ll never work here”
61
Q

Does the cognitive interview only provide an increase in accurate information

A
  • Kohnken et al (1999) found that an 81% increase of correct information
    • Also found a 61% increase of incorrect information (false positives) when compared to the standard interview