WS1- Intro to Business Models and Partnership Agreements Flashcards
Introduction: How are they established and what does this mean?
- No formality is requried as partnership is defined simply as relatiionshp between persons carrying on a business in a common view to make profit. S1 PA
- This means sometimes, partners may be unaware partnership have arisen if having no egal advice.
Introduction: What is a partnership not?
It is not a legal entity seperate from the partners thmeselves.
Introduction: What is required for a partnership?
Must be at least two persons to form a partnership and PA does not disinguish between actual/legal persons so a company can be a partner.
(a) Formation of Partnerships: What is not required?
There does not have to be an intention on parties to be or form a parnership and one will arise simply if on facts, S1 PA above met.
(a) Formation of Partnerships: What are the rules to determine existance of partnership?
S2 sets out list of rules to establish:
* Evidence of profit sharing will be prima facie evidence but not necessaily conclusive evidence and case law shows if losses also shares then makes it likely to exist.
* If all indiividuals involved in decision making, makes it more likely.
* Loan of money by one to another does not create and case law held if person not being “held out” as partner, then it will make it less likely.
**The facts are essential to determine if partnership exists. **
(b) Use of Partnerships: Why may clients ask you to help avoid creating a partnership rather than make one?
PA 1890 is old legislation and default provisions implied are often unsuited for modern business and clients will have concerns above unlimited liabiltiy
(b) Use of Partnerships: What are advantages of partnerships?
- Costs nothing to create as no fomalities.
- No required formalities for runnign such as no filing or disclosure requirements in contrast to companies which are heavily regulated which allows for high degree of confidentially.
(c) Fiduciary relationship of partners: What is the overriding duty?
Partners owe overriding duty of good faith.
(c) Fiduciary relationship of partners: What must partners ensure they do/meet?
- Honest and full disclosure
- Unauthorised personal profit
- Conflict of duty and interest
Note - If creditor obtains judgement against one or a number, this will not discharge other so techically liabiltiy is joint and several.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts: What is the liabiltiy of partners?
Since it has no seperate legal personality, parners are personally liable in relation to contract which are binding on the firm.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts: What does PA act set out for nature/extent of such liability?
- Contractual liability - Every partner is liability jointly with other partners for all debts and obligations of firm incurred whilst partner.
- Tortious liability - In tort, partners laibility is joint and several.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts - Non Partners: 1) What is the position for new partners? (S17)
- Under S17(1) a new partner will not automatically be liabile in relation to any debts incurred by partnership before they joined.
- Under 17(2) a partner will still be laible after they retire in respect of debts incurred by partnership while partner and in order to relieve liability, partnership may novate the relevant agreement but creditor must consent.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts - Non Partners: 2) What is the position for former partners? (S36)
- Former partner could also become liable for debts incurred after they leave.
- TP can treat all apparent partners of firm (i.e before depature) as jointly liable to pay any new debt incurred unless TP has been notified of this change either by:
Actual notice - For those who had actual dealing with the partner before departure
Constructive notice - By viture of publication of departure in the London Gazaette for those without actual dealings with partner before departure.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts - Non Partners: 2) What will former partner not be liable for?
Any debts to TP who did not know themto be a partner before they left and no ntoice has to be given to these persons.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts - Non Partners: 3) What is the position for “holding out”
- Generally, person not a partner has no personal liability for partnership debts.
- However, S14 PA sets out circumstances where non-partner may be personally liable on partnership debt if hel themselves out as a partner or knowingly allowed themselves to be held out.
(d) Personal liability for partnership debts - Non Partners: 3) What are the elements under S14 foor holding out?
- A representation to TP to effect that a person is a partner.
- The T’s action in response such as giving credit to firm or supplying goods/service.
- TP state of mind was believing or having faith in the representation.
Note - Appreciate that S14 relates to liability incurred by the non-partner and not the liability of firm, but liability of firm for acts on non-partner is established through agency.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Conracts binding the firm: What must be considered in practice?
May need to decide if or not partnership is bound by a contract which individual purported to make on its behalf.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: How do you determine if a firm is bound by a contract?
This will depend if individual acting on the firms behalf or not:
- Partners: S5 PA intrudces special statutory rule of agency which applies only when agent is a partner in the firm and common law agency may apply where S5 not relevant.
- Non-Partners: Common law of agency will apply and S5 does NOT apply.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm - 1) Partners content What is position where partners content with agents act (whether partner or non-parner?
- Most cases, individual acting as firms agent (if partner or not) will simply put in effect wishes as partnership as whole.
- If this is the case and given actual, express or implied authority then firm will be bound.
- Even if agent had no authority at time of contract but partners happy to be bound, no issue as partners can ratify (approve) the act and adopt contract either expressly or simply by performing it.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 2) Partner binding against others wishes? Can partner bind firm against others wishes?
S5 provides firm to be bound in certain circumstances, even if other partners not happy to be bound by the contract and since S5 is to protect TP’s it is the TP’s view that is relevant.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 2) Partner binding against others wishes? What must you first consider to decide if it will bind the firm?
- S5 is always first place but does not displace common law agency entirely.
- So, if partner has formed a very unusual kind of contract, S5 analysis may lead you to conclude firm is not bound, but particular facts of case may mean partner did have partners apparent authoirty at common law.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 2) Partner binding against others wishes? When under S5 will unauthoised act bind the firm when viewed objectively?
- The act is for carrying on business of kind carried on by the firm (So, would you expect firm to enter such contract?)
- The act is for carrying on such business in the usual way (Is this kind of contract a partner acting alone would usually make or would outsider expect all partners to sign?
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 2) Partner binding against others wishes? When will a firm not be bound?
- If the TP actually knew the partner in question was not authorised to enter
- TP did not know or believe that the partner was a partner
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 2) Partner binding against others wishes? Who may the partner without actual authority be liabile to?
The other partners for breach of contract.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 3) Non-Partner binding against others wishes? What does not apply in these circumstances and what does instead?
- As noted by FC 18, S5 does not apply if person entering contract is not a partner.
- Instead, the common law rules of Agency establish if or not firm is bound.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 3) Non-Partner binding against others wishes? When may agent bind when non-partner?
- At common law, agent who has no actual authority, may still bind if they have apparent authority to enter.
- This arises when the firm represents or permits representation to be made to a TP that the person has authority to bind the firm. (E.G Firm employs a marketing manager” which title would confer apparent authority to bind on marketing decisions”
- So, once firms represnetation made and relied on, the firm would be bound by the actions.
(e) Relationship between firm and outsiders: Contracts binding the firm: 3) Non-Partner binding against others wishes? What is the position for holding out?
Where representation a person is a partner but not, then firm is said to be holding out that person as partner.
If held out, that person has the apparent authority to bind firm in same way a real partner can an example would be a firm using the old letterhead of a retired partner.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships: What is tax transparancy and what does it mean?
Each partner is liable as an individual on their share of the income/gains of partnership which is known as tax transparancy.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships: What must the partnership do in respect of tax?
Despite no legal entity, and does not itself pay tax, HMRC requires partnership to make single tax retgurn of profits as with sole traders, partnership choose their own accounting period.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships: What must individual partners then do?
Partners then must submit their own individual tax returns containing all income received from partnership as well as other income receipts.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships - 1) Income Tax: How are partners liable?
Each partner personally liable for income tax on their share of partnership profits and unlike other liabilities where there is joint and several liable, a partner is not liable for tax on others.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships - 2) Capital gains tax: How are partners liable?
Normal capital gains tax principles apply on disposal of capital asset by partnership.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships - 2) Capital gains tax: How are capital gains divided?
Each partner treated as ownng a fractional share of the asset and on disposal, each is treated as having made disposal of their share and will eb taxed on any gain subject to any reliefs available.
(f) Taxation of Partnerships - 2) Capital gains tax: What will the amount of share be determined by?
Profit sharing ration (PSR) and if none, then equally.