Wk 9 - Moderation w Regression Flashcards

1
Q

What 3 methods might we use to examine 3-variable relationships?

A

Simultaneous prediction - multiple direct effects
Mediation - indirect effect
Moderation - direct effect influenced by 3rd variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does a moderator do? (x2)

A

Influences pre-existing relationship between 2 variables

Affects strength of an effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What relationships does/should a moderator have to other variables? (x3)

A

Ideally independent of predictor
May/not be related to the outcome variable
Enhances/attenuates/reverses the predictor-outcome relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does the focus of moderation different from mediation? (x2)

A

Moderation is about direct effect changes

Mediation is indirect effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What questions are we asking in moderation? (x3)

A

Does the degree of the moderator modify the effect of the predictor on outcome?
*Does the interaction have an effect beyond isolated variables?
Does an effect apply differently to subsets of people?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What question is mediation asking? (x1)

A

What mechanism underlies the predictor-outcome relationship?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What kind of variables can be used in moderation analysis with regression? (x2, x2, x2)

A

Moderator can be continuous or categorical
*Often measured, but manipulated ok
Predictor - continuous/categorical, measured/manipulated
Continuous outcome - linear regression
Categorical outcome - logistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is the interaction calculated in moderation with regression? (x1)

A

Product of predictor and moderator scores`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is the interaction term evaluated in moderation with regression? (x3, x2)

A
Hierarchical regression (2 stage)
    *Add predictor and moderator
    *Introduce interaction term
Test for significant change in R-square
    *Does interaction improve model fit?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does a significant interaction term imply? (x1)

A

That effect of predictor on outcome is different depending on level of moderator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If the interaction term is significant in moderation with regression, our next questions are? (x2)

A

How does the moderator affect the relationship?

How do the predictor-outcome slopes differ at high vs low levels of the moderator?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do we evaluate the effects of a significant interaction term in moderation with regression? (x2)

A

Simple slopes analysis:

*Separate regression analyses at +/- 1 SD of moderator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 5 steps in conducting moderation multiple regression?

A

Mean-centre predictor and moderator variables
Compute interaction variable
Conduct hierarchical regression
If significant interaction term - simple slopes
Plot slopes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do we mean-centre scores ion moderated multiple regression? (x1)
With the desired effect being to? (x1)

A

Mean-centred score = score - mean

Reduce collinearity with interaction term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What can we use to automate the complex process of MMR? (x1)

A

PROCESS macro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the consideration for developing hypotheses about moderation? (x1, x2, x2)

A

Must hypothesise a significant interaction in initial MMR
Hyps are theory dependent
*Expect enhance, attenuate, reverse relationship?
Simple slopes can be significant or ns
*Maybe no predictor-outcome relationship at 1 level of moderator

17
Q

What is necessary before we can infer causality in MMR?

A

Manipulate predictor and moderator in different studies

*ie,not cross-sectional design

18
Q

Is it possible for moderation and mediation to occur simultaneously? (x1)
And… (x1)

A

Yes

Needs at least 4 variables

19
Q

What is the focus of moderated mediation research? (x1)

Which could address what 3 general hypotheses?

A

Indirect effect

The strength of the indirect effect is changed by the Moderator
Different indirect effects are engaged at different levels of the Moderator
Indirect effect of predictor on outcome differs for different groups of people (ie high/low on moderator)

20
Q

What is the focus of mediated moderation research? (x1)

Which addresses what general hypothesis? (x1)

A

Direct effect

Moderation effect is controlled by 4th mediating variable

21
Q

In moderated mediation with a single mediator, what relationships can be influenced by the moderator? (x3)

A

Predictor-mediator
Mediaotr-outcome
Or both

22
Q

In moderated mediation with a parallel mediators, what does the moderator do? (x3)

A

Determines which indirect effect is applicable

*ie, High moderator applied to 1 mediator, low to the 2nd

23
Q

Explain mediated moderation (x3)

A

Moderating effect of 3rd variable controlled by 4th (mediator)
Mediation explains why direct predictor-outcome depends on level of moderator
*ie explains different predictor-outcome relationships for different moderator levels

24
Q

In mediated moderation, explain the relationships between variables (x2)

A

Predictor-outcome relationship is moderated by 3rd variable

Predictor-moderator interaction (the moderating effect) is associated with/controlled by 4th (mediating) variable

25
Q

What general question is addressed by mediated moderation? (x1)

A

What mechanism explains why the effect of (predictor) on (outcome) is different at different levels of (moderator)?

26
Q

What 2 general situations might we apply Moderaton analysis to?

A

ID boundary conditions - where does an effect start/stop

When strength of effect differs across people