Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PSYC4050 > Wk 4 - EFA 2 > Flashcards

Wk 4 - EFA 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 extraction methods used in EFA?

A

Principal Components Analysis (PCA)
Principal Axis Factoring (PAF)
Maximum Likelihood (ML)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain Principal Components Analysis method of EFA (x4)

A

Communalities are set to 1 for each variable
o Assume all variance is shared (no error or unique )
o Therefore, it analyzes both communalities and unique variance together (other methods just do communal)
Extracts components that are assumed to be uncorrelated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the pros of Principal Components Analysis? (x2)

A

o Finds the best mathematical solution

o Typically explains more variance than other methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the cons of Principal Components Analysis? (x2)

A

o Measurement assumption is inappropriate for psychology - factors routinely correlated
o Factor loadings may be artificially high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) method of extraction in EFA?

A

Correlations estimated from empirical matrix - so will be <1
Only analyses shared variance between variables - no error or unique
Acknowledges effect of random factors - excludes it
Assumes factors may correlate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the goal of Principal Axis Factoring method of extraction in EFA? (x1)

A

To maximise variance in observed variables explained by extracted factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the pros of Principal Axis Factoring method of extraction in EFA? (x2)

A

Appropriate measurement assumptions for psych -

Allows that variables may correlate at > 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method of extraction in EFA similar to PAF? (x3)

A

Communalities estimated from empirical correlation matrix,
Only examines shared variance,
And allows possibility of correlated factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method of extraction in EFA different to PAF? (x3)

A

Goal is to maximise likelihood of reproducing the observed variable correlations
(rather than explain the most variance in variables)
Which may result in different solution to just ‘fitting’ the variances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method of extraction in EFA? (x3)

A

Calculates a model,
Then tries to find values, factor loadings etc, that put the model in the best shape to predict the present data
o This tends to be preferable to PAF, but gives quite similar results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are pros of the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method of extraction in EFA? (x2)

A

Appropriate measurement assumptions for psychology

Gives Goodness of Fit test - Are diffs between our model and the data significant/problematic?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How to choose an extraction method in EFA? (x4)

But you’ll find that… (x1)

A

PAF or ML for a priori ideas - more flexibility, more realistic assumptions
If no unique variance, PCA - but unlikely in psych
If independent test constructs, PCA
o If possibly correlated, PAF or ML

Results often consistent across methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 2 classes of rotation methods in EFA?

A

OrthogonalOblique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain orthogonal rotation in EFA? (x4)

A

o Assumes factors are independent (uncorrelated)
o Orthogonal – all axes move the same amount/degree
o So remain perpendicular to one another
• Maintains original eigenvectors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain oblique rotation in EFA? (x2)

A

o Assumes factors can be correlated

o Factor axes may not be perpendicular to one another after rotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 3 types of orthogonal rotation in EFA?

A

Varimax
Quartimax
Equamax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain the Varimax method of orthogonal rotation in EFA (x3)

A

 Minimize complexity of FACTORS
 Identifies cluster of variables that defines any one factor
 The SPSS default

18
Q

Explain the Quartimax method of orthogonal rotation in EFA (x2)

A

 Minimize complexity of VARIABLES

 Identifies variables defined by only one factor

19
Q

Explain the Equamax method of orthogonal rotation in EFA (x2)

A

 Attempts to minimize complexity of both factors and variables, but results are unstable…
Don’t do this.

20
Q

What 2 kinds of loadings are used in oblique rotation in EFA?

A

Pattern loadings

Structure loadings

21
Q

Explain the Pattern Loadings used by oblique rotation methods in EFA? (x4)

A

Indexes unique relation between a factor and a variable,
Partialling out effects of other factors (like a partial correlation)
 How strongly does this variable relate to the factor, but controlling for others –
the unique effect of each factor, for each variable

22
Q

Explain the Structure Loadings used by oblique rotation methods in EFA? (x4)

A

Indexes relation between a factor and a variable without accounting for other factors (like a bivariate correlation)
 More traditional – bivariate correlation, no accounting for other stuff

23
Q

What are the 2 types of oblique rotation in EFA?

A

Oblimin

Promax

24
Q

How does Oblimin method of oblique rotation work in EFA? (x2)

A

Minimizes sum of cross-products of pattern loadings

To get variables to load on only a single factor

25
Q

How does Promax method of oblique rotation work in EFA? (x3)

A

Raises orthogonal loadings to a power to reduce small loadings
(a number <1 gets smaller, and so can be ignored),
Then rotates axes to accommodate this modified interim solution

26
Q

How to choose a rotation method? (x2)

A

Varimax most common orthogonal is psych - we want simple factors more than simple variables
If variables correlate, use oblique - Oblimin most common

27
Q

What information is provided by SPSS when doing EFA? (x3, x1, x3, x1)

A

Initial Factor Solution
o Communalities
o Variance explained by each factor / component

Factor loadings describing extracted factors / components

Information about rotated factor solution
o For orthogonal rotation: Factor loadings
o For oblique : Pattern and Structure loadings

Correlations between factors (only if oblique rotation used)

28
Q

What do I need to do when interpreting SPSS output on EFA? (x3)

A

ID patterns in factor loadings - variables at >.70 on one factor but

29
Q

What are the implications of findings mix of positive and negative factor loadings in EFA? (x3)

A

Don’t worry about it in initial/unrotated factor solution
More involved interpretion for rotated solution -
ie, some variables are negatively related to outcome, some positively

30
Q

What are the implications of a variable loading strongly on multiple factors in EFA? (x3)

A

Fails Data-reduction goal
May reflect higher-order/more complex factor
Could remove it, BUT - important variable? Theoretical relevance of higher factor?

31
Q

What are the implications of a variable not loading strongly on any factor in EFA? (x2)

A

It has little to do with constructs of interest

Drop it and re-run analysis

32
Q

What are the implications of a factor whose content renders it uninterpretable in EFA? (x2)

A

No use to anyone

Drop it and re-run analysis

33
Q

What are Heywood Cases in EFA? (x2, plus why a problem x1 each)

A

When communality for a variable is estimated to be > 1 (can’t explain more than all the variance)
Or an eigenvalue for a factor is estimated to be negative (can’t have negative squares)

34
Q

Why do we get Heywood Cases in EFA? (x3)

A

Optimisation process has used logically impossible numbers to solve the math
Perhaps you’ve not included appropriate constraints in analysis
(ie, zero floor for eigenvalues, ceiling of 1 for communality)

35
Q

What are the empirical causes of Heywood cases in EFA? (x2)

A

Too few data points for number of factors extracted

Highly correlated variables

36
Q

How to deal with Heywood cases in EFA? (x3)

A

Drop highly correlated variables
Collect more data to help clarify structure
Maximum Likelihood methods more vulnerable - switch to PAF

37
Q

What do you need to report from the findings of EFA? (x9)

A

List of variables (or items) used
Choice of extraction and rotation methods (with justification, re correlations, error variance etc)
Number of factors extracted, and stopping rule used to determine this
Proportion of variance accounted for by each factor
Factor labels and variables in each
Factor loadings for each factor (rotated and unrotated)
o List range, but provide a full matrix in a Table
o Pattern loadings are most important for oblique rotations
Correlations between factors (if relevant)

38
Q

What are 2 important things to remember about the results of an EFA?

A

Just because you don’t find a factor, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist…
And just because you do, doesn’t mean you’ve found a fundamental construct

39
Q

Example EFA question: If a researcher argues that

  • there is no random error in these test scores
  • it is hard to say how many factors might underlie the tests
  • these factors should be independent/orthogonal

Which stopping rule, extraction and rotation method should be used, and why? (x3)

A

Kaiser’s or Scree - explore number of factors

PCA - independent factors, no error

Orthogonal - fits PCA and a priori ideas of final structure

40
Q

Example EFA question: research has argued his tests assess 3 distinct (but related constructs)

Which stopping rule, extraction and rotation method should be used, and why? (x3)

A

A priori - constrain to existing ideas

PAF/ML - safer to assume some measurement error

Oblique - allows for correlated factors

41
Q

Example EFA question:
Research has no expectations re underlying constructs, measurement error assumed, factors should correlate

Which stopping rule, extraction and rotation method should be used, and why? (x3)

A

Kaiser/Scree - no a priori constraints on number of factors

PAF/ML - allows error

Oblique - correlated factors

PSYC4050 (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions