Wk 5 - CFA Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 main purposes of CFA?

A

ID latent psych constructs that account for correlations among sub-sets variables
Assess how strongly each variable is associated with factors
Test hypotheses about factor structure underlying set of variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 main diffs between EFA and CFA? (x2, x2)

A

EFA looks for structure of data set
Is data-driven

CFA tests specific hypotheses about structure
Is theory driven

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain how CFA works (x4)

A

Based on theory, predict which co-variances among vars should be low
Constrain them to zero in analysis
Predict zero correlation between variables and OTHER factor/s
Test how accurately model fits the data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are model parameters in CFA? (x1)

A

Factor loadings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does CFA use model parameters? (x2)

A

Pattern chosen predicts parameters

Iterative process adjusts free parameter loadings to max similarity between predictions and data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How are model predictions evaluated in CFA? (x2)

A

Chi-square test used to test diff between observed and predicted data
Significance = (unwanted) diff between model and data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What 2 important things do CFA results reveal? (x4, x3)

A

‘Quality’ of theory:
o Hypothesized structure ignore anything important (poor fit)?
o Closely capture data (good fit)?
o Parsimony? (minimum psych constructs, not just fit)

Separates in/essential:
o What factors/loadings are needed to describe data structure?
o Which aspects of data can we ignore?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When should we choose EFA? (x3)

A

To explore a set of variables
o Newly developed variables/measures
o No clear ideas about constructs underlying the variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When should we choose CFA? (x3)

A

To test a priori hypotheses derived from:
o Existing theory
o Previous research using the same variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 4 steps in conducting a CFA?

A

Preliminaries
Evaluate model fit
Evaluate parameter estimates (pattern of factor loadings and correlations)
Evaluate alternative models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are 4 preliminary considerations (step 1) for running a CFA?

A

Check assumptions
Specify the model
Model parameters
Sample size?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What assumptions should be checked before running a CFA?

A

Interval scales
Good variance in scores
LInear correlations between variables
Generally normally distributed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the considerations for specifying the model in CFA? (x1, x3)

A

Theory driven assumptions of number/pattern of factors
Capturing most important aspects of data:
 What is essential for explaining the data?
 What can be ignored?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the considerations when deciding on model parameters in CFA? (x2)

A

Which should be fixed (at correlations of zero)?

Which should be free (estimated from the data)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What do free parameters do for CFA? (x2)

A

Add greater flexibility:

Model can account for more patterns in data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the benefit of the added flexibility brought by free parameters in CFA? (x2)

A

Better account of wider range of data

*Explain specific features in data, that aren’t zero correlations

17
Q

What is the downside of the added flexibility brought by free parameters in CFA? (x2)

A

Model that accounts for everything doesn’t give insight:

* More freedom = more noise explained
* Model predicts 'anything could happen'
18
Q

Why is it important to consider sample size for CFA? (x2)

And we should aim for? (x1)

A

Stability of model: small samples = unreliable estimates
Statistical power - detect smaller effects

5 - 10 per parameter

19
Q

In what ways is model fit evaluated (step 2) in CFA? (x3)

A

Against a null hypothesis
In terms of absolute fit
And relative fit

20
Q

What test is used to assess similarity of estimated and observed covariance matrices in CFA? (x1, explain x3)

A

Chi-square test:
Null hypothesis of no diff between model and data
Significance means poor fit
ns means acceptable fit

21
Q

What are the limitations of chi-square test? (x2)

A

Very sensitive to large samples (as used in CFA)

Assumptions of multivariate normality often not met

22
Q

What is the accepted convention for dealing with significant chi-square results in CFA? (x2)

A

Evaluate the importance:

*If chi-square over df > 2, misfit can be downplayed/dismissed

23
Q

What are alternative indices (to chi-square) used for in CFA? (x4)

A

Assess how much observed co/variance matrix accounted for by model
Absolute fit, and relative, against baseline model
Range 0 - 1 (no NHST)
*higher is better (goodness of fit)

24
Q

What 6 alternative indices are used in CFA?

And you should… (x1)

A
Normed fit index (NFI)		
Non-normed fit index (NNFI)
Incremental fit index (IFI) 	
Comparative fit index (CFI)
Goodness-of-fit index (GFI)    	
Adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI)

Report 2 chosen a priori

25
What are residual fit indices used for in CFA?
``` Assess amount of co/variance matrix not accounted for by model *Extent of model mispredictions *Diff between theory and data Range 0 - 1 (no NHST) *Lower is better (badness of fit) ```
26
What 2 residual fit indices are used in CFA? And we should... (x1)
``` SRMR = standardized root mean squared residual RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation ``` Report both
27
What does a good model fit imply in CFA? (x3)
Hypothesised model/theory gives accurate account of the data Theory-driven constraints on parameters were appropriate *O/wise, poor fit...
28
What doesn't a good fit imply in CFA? (x3)
That the model is 'correct' That factor loadings are high (only that they're not zero) That factors explain lotsa variance - error terms are estimates
29
What does a poor fit imply in CFA? (x3)
Model doesn't adequately account for the data Fails to capture underlying correlational structure One of constraints/fixed parameters should be relaxed
30
What could be producing a poor model fit in CFA? (x3) And need to consider that... (x1)
Incorrect prediction of how DVs relate to factors? *May need allowance to load onto others May need to introduce between-factor correlations Tinkering detracts from a priori theory testing
31
What is involved in evaluating parameter estimates (step 3) in CFA? (x3)
Are significant loadings consistent with hypotheses? Estimates for free parameters tested for significance Against null hypothesis of factor loadings/correlations = zero
32
What is involved in evaluating alternative models (step 4) in CFA?
Evaluating fit of simpler (factors nested) model | Does more parsimonious model give comparable fit?
33
What can we conclude if alternative models give a poorer fit in CFA? (x2) Which is determined by calculating... (x2)
Fails to accurately account for data Original model better Chi-square difference between model significance *significant means poorer than original
34
What can we conclude if alternative models give a better fit in CFA? (x2) Which is determined by calculating... (x2)
That there are multiple plausible accounts for data *Have to decide what to argue for... Chi-square difference between model significance * ns means as good as original * choose most parsimonious
35
What are the 2 important questions answered by CFA?
o How do variables correlate with factors? | o How do factors correlate with one another?
36
What is 1 main con and 1 main pro in CFA over EFA?
More restrictive | But allows stronger conclusions
37
What are 2 potential causes of misinterpretation of CFA results?
o Tension between multiple fit indices | o Potential to neglect and/or misevaluate relevant alternative models