wk. 4 Flashcards
Test II
Schedules of Reinforcement
- a formula/rule describing the proportion of response that will be reinforced
- can be continuous or intermittent
Continuous - schedule (CRF)
every response is reinforced (aka FR1 schedule)
Intermittent - schedule
- not every occurrence is reinforced
- most real world examples are intermittent
Ratio
- based on the number of response
Four Main Categories of Intermittent Schedule
- Fixed Ratio (FR)
- Variable Ratio (VR)
- Fixed Interval (IF)
- Variable Interval (VI)
Fixed Ratio (FR#)
- schedule of reinforcement required the completion of a fixed number of responses for a reinforcer
- Ex: After every 10 hw problems you complete, you get a sticker, every 10 the reinforcer is presented; FR10
Variable Ratio
- the number we use in the schedule will fluctuate
- not always the same number of responses
- average is used
- Ex: child repeatedly asks to go play; parent gives in after variable number of requests (~VR3 = the average number to times that the kid asks and then mom gives in) the schedule is not deliberately planned
Interval
based on time elapsed since last response
Fixed Interval
- hospital patient
- SR follows the first response after a fixed amount of time as passed since last reinforced response
- the reinforcer is available after the fixed amount of time passes and another repose occurs
- The time has to go by and then you have to respond again
Variable Interval
- checking phone
- same as fixed interval, except the time is not the same each interval
- schedule can be intentionally varied
- very high rates of responding
Dense vs Lean Reinforcement
a lot vs a few
Reinforcement Schedule Thinning
- moving from dense to lean schedules of reinforcement
- gradual process to avoid ration strain
- we often want behavior to continue under intermittent schedules (thinner)
Ratio Strain
- if the schedule requirements advance too quickly behaviors will decline
- effects are similar to those of extinction (wk 5)
Variable vs Interval Schedules
V - produce a lot of responding continuously (task completion)
I - work better for requesting-type behaviors
Preference Assessment
- methods for identifying the relative likelihood of certain stimuli to function as reinforcers for an individual
- usually done before intervention begins
- necessary for individuals with limited verbal abilities
- 2 main types: indirect vs direct
Indirect Preference Assessment
- relies on verbal report rather than direct observation of subject interaction with stimuli
- interviews/surveys
- have poor correspondence with reinforcer effects or preference assessment results
- are most useful in combination with direct assessments → come up with a list of items to use in a direct assessment
Direct Preference Assessment
- systematically expose the subject to the actual stimuli
- measure approach, engagement, and/or consumption with those items
- several main types → we will focus on four
- items are offered for a certain amount of time
(ex: 30 sec to 1 min)
Four Types of Direct Assessment
- Single Stimulus
- Paired Stimulus
- Multiple- Stimulus (MSWO)
- Free Operant Stimulus
Single Stimulus Preference Assessment
- present each item one at a time for a certain number of trials
- measure approach or engagement
- yes/no: was the item consumed or used → then report as a percentage of trials
- use average to create hierarchy of items (most to least preferred)
- oldest, simplest, most limited
Paired Stimulus Preference Assessment
- present items two at a time and ask subject to choose one
- subject receives chosen items; present all possible pairings out of the set of items
Ex: game Ellen plays –. Who Would You Date?
A lot of trials
Multiple- Stimulus Preference Assessment (MSWO)
- present all items in assessment at once; ask subject to choose one
- subject receive chosen item → chosen item is taken out of array (not replaced)
- continue this process until they stop choosing or out of items
- often repeat process more than once and average results together
- calculate % of trials item selected out of # of times it was available
Free Operant Stimulus Preference Assessment
- present all items being assessed; allow subject free access
- not completed in trials
- measurement → record duration of engagement with each item within an interval
- report percentage they engaged with each item
Preference vs Reinforcement Assessment
identify the differences
- Preference assessment typically produce ranked hierarchies
- How preferred the items are relative to one another
- Preferred does not necessarily = reinforcer
- Responses may vary substantially in terms of their effort
- Behavior measured in a preference assessment is selection approach or engagement
- Whether a preferred item will be reinforced for other tasks: unclear until a reinforcer assessment is conducted
- **Just because its preferred does not mean its a reinforcer
- **Just because it’s a reinforcer for one task, does not mean it is a reinforcer for another or every task