Wk 2 - What is HS? Flashcards

1
Q

What was the defining concept of the UNDPReport 1994? (x1)

Linking it to… (x4)

A
Introduced HS concept,
Development - 
No peace, no dev, and lack of dev as threat to peace
Poverty as a threat to dignity
Emphasis on non-military threats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Freedom from want approach grew out of the (x1)

And defines HS as having which 4 characteristics?

A

UNDP report 1994
Universal concern
Interdependent – not nationally confined, state by itself cannot deal with
Prevention over intervention
People centred – not rebuilding everything in our image, but help with social context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 7 forms of HS under the freedom from want approach?

A
Economic
Food 
Health
Environmental 
Personal 
Community 
Political
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What four issues arose regarding the adoption of the freedom from want approach to HS?

A

Implicit contestation of sovereignty/need for oversight – Russia/Chine wouldn’t back it
Development agenda came from development agency – no support from others
Sheer breadth seen as impractical
Root causes – UNDP had big agenda, others wanting to focus on preventing deadly conflict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What 5 issues are addressed under the freedom from fear approach to HS? (according to Canada)

A
Protection of civilians
Peace support ops
Conflict prevention
Governance and accountability
Public safety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the basic premises of the freedom from fear approach? (x3)

A

Assumes primacy of physical safety
As distinct from/prior to economic issues
Therefore, HS should focus on rights and protection of individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What 3 successful changes resulted from the freedom from fear approach to HS? (X3)

A
Ottowa Treaty (landmine convention)
ICC
R2P doctrine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the vital core, as per the CHS report 2003? (x1)

And the main issue?

A

Protecting freedoms/people from critical (severe) and pervasive (widespread) threats.
Broad - no actual def of what is vita, the essence of life, or crucially important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the CHS report 2003 identify as the major component of HS? (x1)
What 2 methods did it suggest?

A

The vital core
Protections strategies – by states, IOs, NGOs, private sector
Empowerment strategies – resilience building

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

World Summit Outcome Declaration 2005 included… (x3)

A
Peacebuilding Commission
HR Council (replaces Commission)
Recognition of R2P/intervention in genocide, cleansing, crimes against humanity and war crimes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What four issues remain unresolved regarding the definition of HS?

A

Broad set of issues?
Basic rights/freedoms and root causes of conflict?
Maximalist or minimalist?
Should def be precise, or does ambiguity allow wider contexts?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Owen 2008 suggest HS be approached? (X2)

What 3 main issues of definition does he identify?

A

Broad, universal, threshold approach needed.
Can’t ignore preventable threats like disease.
Lack of differentiation between HS and development
HR and HS can be interchangeable
Conceptual overstretch – over-securitisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the issue of conceptual overstretch? (x1)

And Owen’s suggested solution? (x1)

A

That tendency to include everything in definition of HS in various UN instruments has had negative effect
Threshold - past which any issue in any region can be included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was MacFarlane and Kong’s solution to Paris’ 2001 ‘incoherent’ over-broadening of the HS concept? (x2)
And issue of (x1)

A

Instead suggest humans accepted as referent, and threats be delineated/justified on analytical grounds
Narrow def – is freedom from organized violence/fear
Can still be private or public actors – do organized criminal gangs count?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what two main ways is HS concept viewed/implemented?

A

Policy agenda – puts in in the realm of competing politics
Discourse – reconceptualising/reconstituting notions of security by reshaping actors identities. Informally, it created change in how UN operates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do Middle Powers (Australia, Canada, Nordic, Japan) support the development of HS concept? (x2)

A

Pursuing multilateral solutions, embracing compromise/’good citizenship’
Tendency to mediatory/consensus-building – strongly supportive of multilateralism

17
Q

Why do the middle powers adopt the HS concept? (x3)

A

State’s own domestic policies
Desire by the elite sectors to enhance the role played by their country
‘Punch above their weight’ - path to enhanced status/influence in international affairs, guided by own domestic politics