Wk 11 - Learning Flashcards
Pavlov’s classical conditioning is… (x2)
Pairing unconditioned stimulus to a neutral one until the presentation of the neutral (now conditioned) stimulus alone is sufficient to elicit the response
Eg bell with dog food = salivation as a conditioned response to bell
Thorndike’s instrumental/operant conditioning… (x2)
Animal makes response - satisfying response makes repetition more likely, unsatisfactory = gradual disappearance of response
Eg cats get gradually better at escaping the box
BF Skinner’s approach to instrumental/operant conditioning… (x4)
Rewarding of act/near approximation can be used to shape behaviour
We are purely product of punishment/reward
Mind/other subjective phenomena don’t exist/can’t be studied - free will as fiction
Eg hungry pigeons learn to peck to produce food, as gambling relates to reinforcement schedule
Positive reinforcement is…
Behaviour/response followed by rewarding stimulus = increases in the behaviour
Negative reinforcement/escape is…
Behaviour/response followed by removal of aversive stimulus = increase in the behaviour
Positive punishment…
Behaviour/response is followed by aversive stimulus (e.g. shock, noise) = decrease in behaviour
Negative punishment…
Behaviour/response is followed by the removal of a positive stimulus (e.g. toy) = decrease in behaviour
Extinction is…
When a previously reinforced behaviour is no longer effective, it fades out
A large proportion of human learning occurs through… (x2)
Observational and social learning, not
Classical conditioning, punishment or reward
Vygotsky’s General Law of Cultural Development… (x4)
Every function in development appears both at the
Social level - interpsychologically, and
Individual level - intrapsychologically
All higher functions originate as relations
Zone of proximal development… (x2)
Gap between potential development and that achieved through independent problem-solving determined by peer/adult interaction
Presupposes a specific social nature
Meltzoff demonstrated kids understanding/imitation of ‘intended actions’ through… (x3)
Modelling pulling apart of dumbbell = imitation of the behaviour, but
Modelling inability to pull apart dumbbell = same ability to pull apart as those who’d seen it modelled
Doesn’t fit with strict behaviourist account - child is reading intent
Gergely et al. demonstrated rational imitation through… (x2)
If experimenter turned light light on with head because hands were occupied with holding blanket, kids only imitated if their hands were similarly occupied
Otherwise just used hands - more rational action
Rational imitation is that… (x2)
Give kids a reason for your behaviour, they’ll make judgment based on that reason
Otherwise they’ll imitate, assuming that there is reason
Horner and Whiten demonstrated the importance of imitation in human development by…
Finding that… (x2)
Modelling complex behaviour sequence, to kids and chimps, for getting reward out of opaque box
Only humans will repeat sequence when box is see-through
Chimps are functional, use the short-cut - kids are focussed on repeating behaviour