WIK Flashcards

1
Q

Define ‘Epistemology’.

A

Epistemology is the area of philosophy that considers:
- The nature/definition of knowledge.
- The source/s of our concepts/knowledge.
- The limits/extent of our knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define ‘Ability Knowledge’.

A

Knowledge of how to / being able to do something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define ‘Acquaintance Knowledge’.

A

Knowledge from direct contact/experience with something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define ‘Propositional Knowledge’.

A

Knowing a proposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Summarise ‘Linda Zagzebski’s nature of definition’.

A

Linda Zagzebski’s nature of definition is a theory in Epistemology that proposes that we should try to give knowledge real definitions instead of conventional definitions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State ‘Zagzebski’s claims’.

A

1) There are reasons to think Knowledge does not have a real definition…
2)…but we should still try to give a real definition of knowledge…
3)…and only stop if we fail / realise we cannot.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define a ‘Real Definition’.

A

A definition that is based on terms of its nature/essence (properties or characteristics).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define a ‘Non-Real/Conventional Definition’.

A

A definition that is NOT based on terms of its nature/essence (properties or characteristics).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define ‘Necessary’.

A

A part of what is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define ‘Sufficient’.

A

All that is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Summarize ‘The Tripartite definition of Knowledge’.

A

The Tripartite definition of Knowledge is a theory in Epistemology that proposes that there are three conditions that are individually necessary - belief, justification, and truth - and are jointly sufficient for a proposition to be considered knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

State the claims within ‘The Tripartite definition of Knowledge’.

A

Someone has propositional knowledge if and only if…
1) …they believe the proposition (if you don’t believe something then you can’t know it).
2) they are justified in believing that proposition (if something is merely a true belief, this might just be by luck).
3) and the proposition is true (if something is false, you cannot know it, you can just think that you know it).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define ‘A Posteriori Justification’.

A

Justification for a belief that is dependent upon experience/s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define ‘A Posteriori Knowledge’.

A

A true belief that is justified with experience/s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define ‘A Priori Justification’.

A

Justification for a belief that is independent upon experience/s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define ‘A Priori Knowledge’.

A

A true belief that is NOT justified with experience/s.