PoE Flashcards
Define ‘Moral Evil’.
Harm or suffering that free agents/beings are responsible for.
Define ‘Natural Evil’.
Harm or suffering that are caused by natural events / physical processes that free agents/beings are NOT responsible for.
Summarise ‘The logical problem of evil’.
The logical problem of evil is an argument within the Metaphysics of God that proposes the existence of God (as normally defined) is logically impossible as evil exists.
State ‘The logical problem of evil’ in standard form.
P1: If God exists then God is omnibenevolent and so would be opposed to evil and would eliminate evil as far as it could.
P2: If God exists, then God is omnipotent and so would be able to eliminate evil
P3: If God exists then God is omniscient and so would know that evil exists and/or that it is about to come into existence.
C1: Therefore, if God exists then evil would not exist.
P4: Evil exists.
C2: Therefore, God does not exist.
State the type of argument ‘The logical problem of evil’ is.
1) Deductive -The conclusion follows the premises with logical necessity
2) A Priori - It is NOT justified through experience
Summarise ‘The evidential problem of evil’.
The evidential problem of evil is an argument within the Metaphysics of God that proposes the existence of God (as normally defined) is highly unlikely as evil exists.
State ‘The evidential problem of evil’ in standard form.
P1: If an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God exists, then any evil that exists must exist for a morally good reason.
P2: We do not know of any morally good reason that would justify the existence of certain evil events that exist
P3: If we do not know of any morally good reason for many evil events, then there probably isn’t a morally good reason for at least some of these events.
C1: Therefore, for at least some evil events, there probably isn’t a morally good reason that would justify them.
C2: Therefore, God most likely doesn’t exist.
State the type of argument ‘The evidential problem of evil’ is.
1) Non- Deductive -The conclusion follows the premises with high certainty, NOT logical necessity
2) A Posteriori - Justified through experience
Define a ‘Defense’.
A logically possible explanation as to why God permits evil.
Define a ‘Theodicy’.
A plausible or reasonable explanation as to why God permits evil.