BId Flashcards

1
Q

Summarise ‘Berkeley’s Idealism’.

A

Berkeley’s Idealism is a theory in Epistemology that proposes that immediate objects of perception are ordinary objects which are mind-dependent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

State the main claims made by ‘Berkeley’s Idealism’.

A

(MAIN) Immediate objects of perception are ordinary objects which are mind-dependent.
1) Anti-Realism - All that exists are minds and their (mind dependent) ideas. Ordinary objects are nothing more than collections of ideas.
2) Ideas - We immediately perceive (mind dependent) ideas.
3) God exists as the cause of our ideas and of their coherence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define ‘Sensible Property’.

A

A sensible property is a property that we are able to sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State ‘Berkeley’s Idealism’ in standard form.

A

P1: We are directly/immediately aware of ordinary objects.
P2: The only things we are directly/immediately aware of are (collections of) ideas/sensations.
C1: Therefore, ordinary objects are (collections of) ideas/sensations.
P3: Ideas/sensations cannot exist unperceived.
C2: Therefore, ordinary objects cannot exist unperceived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Summarise ’Berkeley’s attack on the primary/secondary property distinction’.

A

Berkeley’s attack on the primary/secondary property distinction
within Epistemology argues against Lockes Primary/Secondary quality distinction - saying that they are the same as they are both mind dependent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State ‘Berkeley’s attack on the primary/secondary property distinction (variation)’ in standard form.

A

P1: If a property is subject to interpersonal and intrapersonal perceptual variation then that property is mind-dependent.
P2: Both Secondary” and Primary properties are subject to interpersonal and intrapersonal perceptual variation.
C: Therefore, both Secondary and Primary qualities are mind dependent, so there is no distinction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State ‘Berkeley’s attack on the primary/secondary property distinction (conceivability)’ in standard form.

A

P1: An object with primary properties without any secondary properties is inconceivable.
P2: if such an object is inconceivable, then it is impossible.
P3: if it is impossible then both primary and secondary properties must both be essential properties of objects.
C1: Therefore, both primary and secondary properties must both be essential properties of objects, so there is no distinction.
C2: Therefore, they must both be In the mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Summarise ‘Berkeley’s Master argument (based on inconceivability)’.

A

Berkeley’s Master argument in Epistemology argues against realism, as its core concept of mind independent objects are impossible, as they cannot be conceived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

State ‘Berkeley’s Master argument (deductive)’ in standard form.

A

P1: Mind-independent objects are inconceivable because the moment you attempt to conceive of one, what you conceive of is in the mind and so is mind-dependent.
P2: If something is inconceivable, then it is impossible.
C1: Therefore, mind-independent objects are impossible.
C2: Therefore realism is impossible and so is false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly