When Cultures Collide Flashcards
How does information travel quickly?
Through social media - cultures come into contact all the time
What is acculturation?
It is a term which results when groups of individuals having different cultures come into first hand continuo contact, which changes their original culture patterns of either or both groups
In practise, one group usually changes more. Acculturating group (minority) vs the host society (majority)
What are the reasons why people come into contact from different societies?
Most societies are plural because of: Migrants Sojourners Refugees Tourists Indigenous people
Why do these groups come into contact with each other?
Voluntary (economic migrating, touring, students, businesses)—forced (refuges fleeing)
Sedentary—mobile (arrived recently)
Permanent—temporary (moving between)
Global communications - doesn’t necessarily involve going to other places, occurs on social eider, international distribution of films and products, can come into contact with others just through communication
What are the effects of psychological acculturation?
Psychological - individuals in both groups experience changes because of it
Process of adaptation - affective, behavioural and cognitive
Intergroup relations - power differentials, peaceful/hostile
Cultural changes - both groups, can lead to emergence of new norms
Acculturation strategies - changes in practises, values and identifications
What are the processes of adaption?
ABSs - coping with culture shock Affective (a.k.a. “psychological adaptation”) Psychological well-being vs. anxiety, stress, depression Behavioural (a.k.a. “sociocultural adaptation”) Learning effective social skills for new cultural environment vs. social difficulties in everyday functioning Cognitive Beliefs, values, and cultural identity
What was the traditional view of acculturation?
Used to believe, the minority could either separate from their group to maintain their culture or assimilate to have a relationship with the dominant grou
A key question for minority: is it considered to be of value to maintain cultural identity and characteristics, or to maintain relationships with dominant group?
What does Berry’s theoretical mode identify?
Identifies TWO key questions:
Is it considered to be of value to maintain cultural identity and characteristics? - Separation, no relationship with dominant group, cultural maintenance
Is it considered to be of value to maintain relationships with other groups? Assimilation - have a relationship with group, but no cultural maintenance
These are separate questions!
What are the 4 acculturation strategies?
Integration - relationship with the dominant group and keep cultural maintenance
Assimilation - relationship with dominant group but no cultural maintenance
Separation - no relationship with dominant group but keep cultural maintenance
Marginalisation - no relationship with group and no maintenance
How are individual strategies measured?
In terms of: Preferences for contact Preferences for cultural maintenance Cultural identities Language use and proficiency Cultural practices (food, clothing, media, etc.) Family and peer relationships
What is the largest study to data?
4000 young immigrants, 30 ethnic groups, 13 nations
Cluster analysis shows four predicted groupings
What have the studies showed about the strategies?
In most samples surveyed
Participants tended to prefer integration to the other acculturation strategies
Participants who adopted integration showed the best psychological adaptation / least stress
Marginalisation is least adaptive
Assimilation and separation show intermediate and more variable outcomes, depending on context
What have studies which look at traditional family values shown?
Looked at traditional family values among Greeks in different locations: Greece, Germany, Netherlands, Canada
Canada (multicultural, more languages, respects others)
Greeks in Canada - maintained more family values than in other cultures, because Canada supported this
When Greek in Germany, maintained less values
What is the difference between settler societies and non settler societies?
Berry et al distinguished between settler (multicultural) and non settler societies (stable majority)
Integration more common in settler soceities
Separation predicts psychological adaptation bettter in non-settler socieites
but varies with culture of origin
What has the more recent expanded model of strategies shown?
Multiculturalism - integration, needs policy and values (so easy to adopt integration)
Segregation - separation but also rejection
Melting pot - assimilation, but pressure to adopt majority culture
Exclusion - marginalisation, entre can cause ethnocide - wiping out the minority culture