western politics Flashcards

1
Q

Social Democrats

A

Left
Strongest and most enduring
End of 19th century interests of emerging working class (trade unions)
From explicit marxist to introduction of social rights → expansion of welfare states
Welfarism → Middle class catch-all party→ equalize opportunities rather than outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Communists

A

Left

Working class, not super popular, only important in a few countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The New Left

A

left libertarian party
Only in a few countries and small
Explicit appeal to working class (not same as green)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Green

A

1970s-80s
left libertarian party
pervasive but small

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conservatives

A

Right
Steady
Where no Christian democrats, main alternative to social-democrats
National parties, decry sectional or class politics
Strident anti-socialist rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Christian Democrats

A

Not in the southern Europe (except Portugal)
In most established Western democracies (not UK)
Response to secularizing trends by conservatives and liberals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Liberals

A

right small frie

pervasive but small

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Agrarian parties

A

Only in a few countries (Scandinavia) but relatively hughe
Represent agricultural sector
Drifting from left towards right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Far-Right

A

Now pervasive
Major impact on party competition
Supporting or participating in government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Parties of intra-parliamentary origin

A

Disagreement does NOT = disloyalty and org does NOT = conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Parties of extra-parliamentary origin

A

Need to mobilize and organize those excluded from participation to support leaders and promoting reforms
Ended censitaire suffrage (extend franchise)
Changed liberal regimes into liberal democracies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Catch-all party

A

A political party that accommodates people who have a wide range of beliefs, parinciples or backgrounds
Moving across traditional boundaries of existing cleavages
Evolved from pre-existing parties (elite and mass parties) whose electorates were not large enough to win elections (since 1950s)
Strategy: office seeking
Need to appeal across group boundaries to get more votes and resources
Ideological orientation of the party blurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cartel Parties

A

Evolved mainstream “hegemonic” parties in a context of erosion of party loyalties
Strategy = protect themselves from electoral challengers
They become agencies of the state, instead of agencies of the society, and rely in public subventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Anti-cartel parties

A

Parties with a lower probability of coming to power - organized around an idea rather than a social group
Strategy = expect deeper commitment from their members
Claim that mainstream parties focus on defending their priveleges rather than soliving the problems of the society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Main cleavages in W. Europe

A
Urban-rural cleavage
Confessional cleavage (Catholic, protestant, muslim)
State-Church (secular cleavage)
Ethnic+Linguistic Cleavage
Class Cleavage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Freezing Hypothesis (Lipset and Rokkan)

A

Western European party systems became frozen following the extension of universal suffrage in most countries during the 1920s.
New cleavages became activated, new parties could be formed to capture segments of the popultion that had not previously been active in electoral politics
After 1920s there were no longer any untapped electoral base to be mobilized into new parties

17
Q

Boix’s hypothesis

A

Why some countries shifted to proportional rules while others maintained majority system?
-Socialist party was strong and nonsocialist party controlled roughly similar shares of electorate
-Failure to reduce the electoral threshold would have led to an overwhelming victory of socialist party
After freezing of party systems along cleavages, policymakers lost interest in modifying electoral regime
-old established ruling parties anticipate the effects of different types of electoral systems and choose the one which favor them the most

18
Q

Plurality/Majority Systems

A

UK and France
Goals: accountability and stability
Constituency/district representative
Produce single-party majority gov’t (BUT not guaranteed)
Accept disproportionality as inevitable
Cons/criticisms
A majority of voters in constituency may not be represented
Wasted votes → depress turnout
Force to vote strategically
Favour large parties and penalize small ones

19
Q

Proportional electoral system variations

A
  • Electoral Formula (quota or divisor)
  • District magnitude (seats in district, size of district)
  • Threshold
  • Degree of choice given to the voter (types of lists, closed, flexible, open)
20
Q

Mixed systems

A

Germany
2 votes, one to local constituency and one to choose a party list
Italy: parallel system, no compensation

21
Q

Functionalist Approach

A

Welfare state emerged and expanded as an answer to the problems created by capitalist industrialization
-Modernization: changing working conditions
-Captalism and industrialization caused social disintegration
-Welfare state solves these problems
Predictions:
-Convergence: different nations will adopt similar social and economic policies at similar levels of development

22
Q

The Class Mobilization Approach

A
Welfare state is seen as the result of political struggles between social classes and their political organizations (strength of social-democracy)
-evidence of a shift in the balance of power in favor of the working class and social democracy
Predictions
-not convergence, variation
23
Q

Institutional Approach

A

Welfare state seen as a central element in modern nation-state building
Autonomy lead to strong welfare state
Lack of autonomy lead to early welfare state politicization, clientelism

24
Q

Anglo-Saxon Liberal Regime

A

US and UK
Tax financed
Only the most needy get the welfare protection
Flat-rate benefits → low (protect from extreme poverty)
More encompassing social protections has to be purchased on the market
Public expenditure in social protection is low

25
Q

Scandinavian and Social Democratic regime

A

Tax-financed
Benefits are granted to ALL citizens (universal welfare state)
Flat-rate tier (minimum standard) + earning-related tier → Benefits are more generous (ensure higher living standard)
Direct provision of services: education, health, care → Welfare state is a major employer (women)
Public expenditure in social protection is very high

26
Q

Continental Conservative Regime

A

Contribution-financed
Benefits are granted based on the employment relation
Those not employed are covered through the working family member
High degree of programme fragmentations
Benefits vary depending on previous income and workers’ record of contributions
Low level of public service provision (transfer payments instead)
Public expenditure in social protection is medium

27
Q

The Council of Europe

A

Not a part of EU

28
Q

The European Commission

A

Decision making process, supranational
Hybrid between gov’t and civil service
Represents the EU interest
Primary responsibility to:
Initiate legislation
Monitor implementation
Represent the Union
President appt by European Council: Jean-Claude Junker
28 commissioners (1 per member state nominated by countries)
Linked to the party in government that appoints them
Commission has to be approved by parliament

29
Q

Council of Ministers (Council of the EU)

A

Decision making process
Ministers of member states
Intergovernmental body
Legislature/2nd chamber

30
Q

European Parliament

A
Represents the citizens’ interests (direct election)
Primary responsibility to:
Legislative process
Check on commission
EU budget
Proportional to a country population
Direct election in each country
Low turnout
European-level party lines
Most work is done in committees
31
Q

The European Council

A

Guidance, intergovernmental
Heads of governments of the 28 member states
President of the European Council–chosen by the members of the council
Incumbent can be re-elected
Donald Tusk–re-elected even though no longer a head of state
All of the major steps forward adopted in the recent years have been initiated by the EC

32
Q

European Court of Justice

A
Guidance, supranational
28 judges, one from each member state
Terms are renewable
Each judge is appointed by a government and relies on its support for renomination--concern regarding judges’ independency
Interprets and applies EU law
Decisions are binding on all member states
Decisions override domestic courts
Can impose fines
Takes 2 years to rule