Week 9 - Social and Emotional Brain Flashcards

1
Q

What is emotion?

A
  • Emotion – reaction to an event that includes a combination of strong feelings, behavioural dispositions and physiological responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two psychological classifications of emotion?

A
  • Categorical vs. dimensional theories of Emotion:
  1. Categorical theories - each emotion is distinct (qualitatively different from each other), e.g. fear is qualitatively different from sadness.
  2. Dimensional theories - different emotions lie in different points in 2-3 dimensions (the difference is quantitative)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Ekman’s 1992 theory of six basic emotions?

A
  • Theory of six basic emotions (Ekman, 1992) – thought these emotions were different from each other because they produce different facial expressions:
  1. Fear
  2. Sadness
  3. Anger
  4. Surprise
  5. Disgust
  6. Happiness
  • Basic emotions:
    • Innate
    • Evolutionary old
    • Shared among animals
    • Facial expressions
    • Universally recognised
  • Paul Ekman and Friesen (1976) investigated whether a small set of ‘basic’ emotions is universally recognized:
    • ‘Pictures of facial affect’ created by asking models to move facial muscles in specified ways.
    • All facial expressions recognised at above-chance levels in all cultures, using forced-choice responses.
  • Ekman (1972) - facial expressions posed by members of the Fore community in New Guinea in response to the stories:
    • “Your friend has come, and you are happy”
    • “Your child has died”
    • “You are angry and about to fight”
    • “You see a dead pig that has been lying there a long time”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Russell’s 1980 circumplex model of affect?

A
  • Each emotion as a point in 2-D space:
  1. Valence (Positive-Negative)
  2. Arousal (High-Low)
  • Russell (1980) circumplex model of affect - ask participants to rate words such as “Happy,” “Sleepy,” “Afraid,” “Sad” etc. on ordinal scale of valance and arousal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline James-Lange Feedback Theory of Emotion (late 19th Century)

A

James-Lange Feedback theory (late 19th century):

  • Stimulus directly causes a bodily reaction, which in turn produces an emotional experience, e.g. we feel happy because we smile
  • Deterministic relationship between bodily reactions and emotions – one-to-one relationship between bodily reactions and emotions.
  • No emotions are felt in absence of bodily reactions
  • For example:
    • Happy – smile
    • Run away = Fear
  • Strack et al. (1988) - participants were asked to rate several cartoons (not at all funny [0] to very funny [9]):
    • Funniness ratings were higher for the Teeth condition (hold a pen with teeth) than the Lips condition (hold a pen with lips)
    • Smile –> feeling happy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline Cannon-Bard’s Theory of Emotion (1920s)

A
  • Cannon-Bard theory (1920s)*:
  • Challenge and alternative to James-Lange theory:
  1. Bodily responses are too undifferentiated – we cry when we are sad AND when we are happy
  2. Bodily responses are too slow to be a source of emotional feeling – when we feel fear we sweat, but this is slow
  3. Hormonal injection failed to generate emotions (norepinephrine & fear)
  • A stimulus SIMULTANEOUSLY triggers activity in the autonomic nervous system and emotional experience – feeling and body response happen at the same time.
  • Cannon-Bard thought Thalamus and hypothalamus play key roles in mediating emotion
  • Looked at the Sham Rage expression in a cat:
    • Removing a region that involved the thalamus and hypothalamus resulting in no sham rage
    • Removing a region that did not involve the thalamus and hypothalamus resulted in sham rage remaining.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline the Limbic System Theory of Emotion

A
  • Papez (1937) hypothesised that a neural circuit controls our emotions. Key regions of his circuit included cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and anterior thalamus and hypothalamus.
  • In a series of studies from the 1940s to the 1970s, MacLean extended Papez’ ideas to include the amygdala and parts of frontal cortex (orbitofrontal cortex) in an extended ‘limbic system.’
  • Not entirely accurate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does Kluver-Blucy syndrome affect a monkey?

A
  • The Klüver-Bucy syndrome (1939) - removing temporal lobes (including hippocampus, amygdala) in the rhesus monkey. Monkey symptoms:
    • Loss of fear
    • Hypersexuality
    • hyperorality (tendency or compulsion to examine objects by mouth)
    • altered food preferences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is the amygdala important for fear learning?

A
  • Amygdala is important for Fear Learning:
  1. Pavlov’s dog experiment (classical conditioning)
  2. Fear learning (or fear conditioning) = classical conditioning using an aversive stimulus. Instead of reward they use an aversive stimulus.
  • Results from Mice Studies (Late 1970s and early 80s):
    • Lesions of amygdala disrupt fear conditioning
    • Lesions of amygdala after conditioning also disrupt storage of response
    • Amygdala is important for both forming stimulus associations (learning) and for subsequently expressing learned behavioural responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline the case of SM who had Urbach-Wiethe disease

A

Adolphs et al. (1994) - Case SM who had Urbach-Wiethe disease:

  • Bilateral amygdala damage.
  • Rare recessive genetic disorder
  • About 50–75% of the diagnosed cases of Urbach– Wiethe disease show bilateral symmetrical calcifications on the medial temporal lobes.
  • SM was asked to rate intensity of each emotion in facial expressions.
    • Abnormal ratings of fear.
    • Note that some other emotions (especially anger) were not entirely normal, but fear was the worst affected.
  • Feinstein et al. (2011) – patient SM:
    • Bilateral amygdala damage.
    • Multiple examples of lack of fear in laboratory tests and in everyday life.
    • held up at knife point and at gun point
    • physically accosted by a woman twice her size
    • nearly killed in an act of domestic violence
    • explicitly threatened with death many times
    • Not fearful of anything – makes mistakes categorising fear again and again
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does functional brain imaging studies show fear?

A

Functional brain imaging studies (Calder, Lawrence & Young, 2001) – fear. For facial expressions, the techniques involve:

  • Comparing blood flow between fear and neutral expressions
  • OR measuring how blood flow changes as the fear expression becomes more intense.
  • Differences shown in amygdala activation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is disgust related to the insula?

A
  • For facial expressions, the techniques mostly involve comparing blood flow between disgust and neutral expressions.
  • The participant is not usually asked about the expression.

Calder, Lawrence & Young (2001):

  • Insula and putamen activated for disgust.

Calder et al. (2000) - disgust recognition and experience - patient NK:

  • Left-sided lesion involving the insula and putamen.
  • Impaired recognition of disgust from face, voice or posture.
  • Reduced experience of disgust in responses to disgust-provoking scenarios (e.g., maggots on rotten meat)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two accounts for the brain basis of emotion?

A
  1. Locationist account:
  • Each emotional state is biologically basic and inherited, and cannot be broken down into more basic psychological components
  • Discrete emotion categories (e.g., fear, anger) are consistently and specifically localised to discrete brain locales or anatomical networks (i.e., one-to-one mapping between brain region and emotion)
  1. Psychological constructionist account:
  • Emotions are psychological events that emerge out of more basic psychological operations that are not specific to emotion
  • Some brain regions are commonly activated by different emotions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What account does the evidence support?

A

Past emotion studies appear to support the locationist account view. However, a more recent meta-analysis supports the psychological constructionist account:

  • Lindquist et al. (2012) – meta analysis of emotion:
    • First they tested the popular locationist view (Panksepp, 1998):
    • Meta-analysis included a total of 234 neuroimaging studies (fMRI and PET) on emotion:
    • A wide range of emotions caused activation in areas like the amygdala – not specific to fear.
    • Disgust didn’t cause a huge activation in the insula compared to other emotions.
  • Is any single region specific to a single category of emotion? No (i.e., evidence against the locationist account)
  • Locationist account is too simplistic (no simple one-to-one relationship)
  • Lindquist et al. (2012) found:
    • Regions that were consistently activated across all emotion neuroimaging studies
    • These are brain regions related to emotions in general
    • Supports constructionist approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What about other emotions?

A

Social emotions (e.g., pride, guilt, embarrassment, shame, envy, etc.):

  • Require higher cognitive ability (e.g., “theory of mind” or ability to understand other’s mental state)
  • Example: Embarrassment
    • Specific to humans = No animal model
  • Social and affective neuroscientists have started investigating the neural bases of complex social emotions
17
Q

What is the role of dACC in social and emotional processes?

A
  • dACC important for processing pain and empathy (empathy for pain), social pain (social rejection)
    • Empathy - the capacity to comprehend and resonate with another’s emotional experience, which leads to a sharing of that person’s feelings.
18
Q

What have the neuroimaging studies on empathy for empathy and pain shown?

A
  • Majority of past studies focused on empathy for pain:
    • Easy to manipulate (electric shock, cold water, heat pain, etc.)
    • Neural mechanisms of pain is well-known so that we can directly compare neural bases of direct pain and empathy for pain
    • Effect is stronger (easy to induce)
  • Singer et al. (2004), fMRI for empathy of pain:
    • 16 couples participated in the study
    • Female partners were scanned by fMRI while – they themselves received painful electric stimulation; they observed that their partners get the stimulation
    • dACC and insula activation by their own pain and by witnessing their partner’s pain.
19
Q

What did Singer’s extra study show about the affective link between empathy and pain?

A

Singer at al. (2006) did another study on empathy and pain but with Affective link manipulation:

  • Before entering an fMRI scanner, each participant met two confederates and played an economic game (sequential Prisoner’s dilemma game) with each of them
  • One of them played the game fairly, while the other played unfairly
  • Results showed that brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals
  • Men show less empathic response to unfair players compared to women
  • Nucleus accumbens (ventral striatum), a part of reward network, was activated only in men when unfair person gets electric stimulation.
20
Q

What is empathy for pleasure?

A
  • Mobbs et al. (2009):
    • Ventral striatum (a part of the reward network) was activated when;
  1. Participants themselves won a game
  2. Similar/likable other won a game
21
Q

What is social rejection?

A
  • Social pain - the experience of pain as a result of interpersonal rejection or loss, such as rejection from a social group, bullying, or the loss of a loved one.
  • Eisenberger, Lieberman & Williams (2003) – cyberball paradigm in fMRI:
    • Participant taking part in a computer game where ball is thrown to them and a computer person. After several throws, the participant is excluded from being passed the ball.
    • Results showed activation in dACC when comparing exclusion > inclusion
    • In addition, the more distress the participants felt, the more activation in the dACC.
22
Q

What is the Neural basis of “theory of mind”?

A
  • Theory of Mind - the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others and to understand that others have beliefs, desires, intentions, and perspectives that are different from one’s own.
  • Theory of Mind starts developing at 3-5 years old
  • Ability to understand false belief (recognise that others can have beliefs about the world that are not consistent with reality) – false belief task used for testing such as the Sally-Anne task.
  • A variety of different tasks that require reading other people’s minds:
    • False belief task
    • Competitive game (e.g., rock paper and scissors; human vs. computer)
  • When we compare computer vs. human, or false belief vs. non-false belief tasks, we see activation in these brain regions:
  1. Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)
  2. Temporal pole
  3. Temporo-parietal junction (TPJ)