Week 8 - Judgement and reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

Attributes substitutions

A

where we rely on easily assessed information to make an estimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Availability heuristic

A

estimate frequency of events using ease with which they come to mind
-often leads to correct estimations, or incorrect due to subjective exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Representativeness heuristic

A

estimate the likelihood of event being in a category using its resemblance with other members of the category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gamblers fallacy

A

assumption based off frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Covariation

A

a correlated variation of multiple factors, affected by base rates to assist us with deciding cause & effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Base rates

A

information about how frequently something happens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Type 1 thinking:

A

fast, easy thinking that is more likely used under time pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Type 2 thinking:

A

slower, more effortful and it more likely to be used in attention and can trigger context cues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The use of base rates depends on how they are presented:

  1. Presentation
A

people are more likely to use base rate information when presented as frequencies than probabilities or proportions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The use of base rates depends on how they are presented:

  1. Chance & random variation
A

the we consider the role of chance of random variation we tend to be more accurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The use of base rates depends on how they are presented:

  1. Education
A

the people have more knowledge of the sample size, they have something to compare it against

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Confirmation and disconfirmation:

Inductive reasoning approach

A

a bottom up approach

observation -> pattern -> hypothesis -> theory

e.g., media coverage about shark attacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Confirmation and disconfirmation:

Deductive Reasoning

A

a top dow approach

theory -> hypothesis -> observation -> confirmation

e.g., when we conduct psychological experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Confirmation bias

A

more likely to seek confirmatory evidence on face value but interpret disconfirmatory evidence.

Better memory of confirmatory evidence than disconfirmatory evidence.

Failure to consider alternative hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Belief perseverance

A

no matter how much disconfirmatory evidence you give them, they’re not changing their beliefs

show signs of confirmation bias / belief perseverance, they’re basically ignoring logic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Syllogism

A

a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a a conclusion based or two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.

17
Q

Valid syllogism

A

All the books from that store are new therefore these are new

18
Q

Invalid syllogism

A

All tigers are felines, all tigers are animals, therefore all animals are felines…..?

19
Q

Decision making:

Utility maximisation

A

utility is a value that we place in a particular outcome

20
Q

Affective forecasting

A

predicting our future feelings.

good at predicting valence (whether it is negative / positive feelings)

bad at predicting how log it will last & ability to adjust to changes.

21
Q

Interpretive bias

A

The tendency to interpret ambiguous stimuli and situation in a threatening fashion