WEEK 7: COHORT, CASE CONTROL STUDIES Flashcards
what are cohort studies
Involve the formation of a cohort, which is a group of individuals followed over time
points to a cohort study
- More expensive, time consuming
- Not efficient for diseases with long latent periods
- Better exposure and cofounder data
- Less vulnerable to information bias
retrospective cohort study
A retrospective cohort study looks back in time. It uses preexisting secondary research data to examine the relationship between an exposure and an outcome. Data is collected after the outcome you’re studying has already occurred
- cheaper, faster
- more vulnerable to bias
prospective cohort study
a prospective cohort study follows a group of individuals over time.
- starts at the cohort
Incidence (Rate) Ratio - Relative Risk in Cohort Studies
Comparison of the incidence of a characteristic in 2 independent populations (or independent subpopulations) calculated by taking a ratio of their incidence rates
- exposed vs. unexposed
advantages of cohort studies
- Valuable when exposure is rare
- Can examine multiple effects of a single exposure
- Easier to determine the temporal relationship b/w exposure and outcome
- Allows measurement of incidence
incidence
the # of new cases of disease in a population during a specified period of time
Reported in terms of incide rate or an incidence population
formula of odds ratio
(odds of disease in exposed/odds of disease in unexposed)
2 necessary requirements for selection of controls
- controls must come from the same source population as cases
- controls must be selected independently of exposure
population based control
control selected from the general population, most suitable when cases are from well-defined geographic areas
nested controls
controls selected from an existing cohort population. Controls represent a subset of the full source population
hospital/clinic based controls
controls selected from among patients at a hospital or clinic
case control studies advantages
- More efficient than a cohort study (in terms of time, money, and effort)
- Suited to diseases with long latent period
- Optimal for rare disease
- Can examine multiple exposures
disadvantages of case control studies
- Exposure is assess after development of the outcome
May be unsure about temporal sequence b/w exposure and disease
Recall bias - Prone to selection bias in control choice - especially if response rates are low
- Can only study 1 disease or outcome
- Inefficient for rare exposures
- Can NOT calculate aboke measure of association
individual vs frequency matching
Individual matching - performed participant by participant
Frequency matching - providing similar distributions of confounders in groups