Week 7 Flashcards
What type of studys is an analytic study
Ecological
Cross-sectional
Case-Control
Cohort
Is case control and cohort studies observation or experimental
Observational
What are 4 determinants we should consider when creating a cohort study
- Those who enter the cohort study should be outcome-free
- Selecting exposed and comparison groups
- Following up participant
- Determining outcome status
Why is cohort study an observational study
There is no intervention you just follow up who gets a disease and who dosen’t
Is the exposure determined before the outcome happens
Yes
What are some disadvantages of cohort studies
More expensive
Time consuming
Not fesable for many disease
What are some advantages of cohort studies
Better exposure and confounder data
Less vulnerable to information bias (recall bias can still happen)
What is a prospective cohort study
You follow people for 10 years and compare incidence of disease
What is retrospective study
You start at outcome and look back in time to see what caused the disease
What are good ways to collect data for a retrospective study
Military data
Occupational study
What are some advantages of retrospective study
Cheaper
Faster
Efficent with disease with long latenet period
What are some disadvantages to a retrospective cohort study
Exposure and confounder data may be inadequate
More vulnerable to bias
Need an established recording system
What is the incidence rate ratio
a/(a+b)/c/(c+d)
if someone develops breast cancer but then latter dies what is there outcome
It is not death it is breast cancer
What is the concept of person-time
People are in the study for a varied durations
Different times under exposure
Contribute differentialy to the study /.p09
What are advantaged of Cohort studies
Valuable when exposure is rare
Can examine multiple effects of a single exposure
Easier to determine the temporal relationship between exposure and outcome
Allows measurement of incidence
What are some disadvantages of cohort studies
Validity affected by losses to follow-up (selection bias)
Other factors may not be distributed evenly between exposure groups
Inefficient for evaluation of rare disease
Can be expensive and tine consuming
If retrospective they require good records
What are limitations to cohort studies
May need large numbers of subjects to be followed for long periods
Loss to follow up to undermine validity
Not good for rare disease or those with long latency
Not good when exposure data are expensive to obtain