Week 5: Threshold ABR Flashcards
when to do evoked response audiometry
- when real audiometry doesn’t work
- is impractical
- or a medical-legal case
when to use ABR to rule in/out hearing loss
- neonates: ERA is more precise
- low functioning
- or setting: post PE tubes in the difficult to test pop
- hysterical/ medical-legal
when to use ABR to rule in/out conductive component with an AC and BC ABR
- abnormal immittance testing
- when AC-ABR cannot be justified with immittance testing
- physical abnormalities
stimulus parameters for threshold ABR
- stimulus: click or TB
- polarity: rarefaction
- intensity: depends
- presentation: monaural
- –can also do binaural till no response then monaural
- rate: (30/second or higher wont sacrifice quality
why use odd number rates
dont want numbers divisible by 60 to limit power line interference
repetition rate effects on infant ABR
- RR 9.5/second was 100% present responses
- RR of 59.5/second was 56% present responses
- all this to say, minimum change in morphology and latency until going over 60 clicks/second
do you need to mask threshold ABR
- most likely no
* generally use inserts and have high sound attenuation, masking might be needed for BC
threshold ABR protocol
*no standard protocol, broadly applicable parameters/methods bu circumstances will dictate
*long-duration stimuli are ideal to approximate behavioral thresholds
*higher rate are better for
Dx
*20/25ms window (the younger the subject the longer window needed because longer latency)
*start looking at big pic, aka stopping at 20-30 dB because close enough to normal, then reduce as time permits, same thing for number or freqs
*very important to have non-stimulus control run
criteria for resposne
- use clincial judgement for what is a response
- the lowest click intensity where wave 5 can be elicited
- –different from residual noise
criteria for threshold
- click ABR threshold correlates best with hearing sensitivity between 1-4 kHZ
- –note you should label and average after the child leaves, not while testing
factors that can influence click ABR
- a complex relationship between cochlear HL and ABR because of interaction between:
- –type of HL
- –degree and configuration of HL
- will affect the L-I function
wave V L-I function for cochlear HL
- wave V latency increases as a function of the degreee of loss at 4 kHz
- correcting wave V latency is important for neurodiagnosis
- –subtract 0.1 ms/10 dB of loss above 50 dB at 4kHz
- high frequency HL will affect earlier waves because they are already small and will get smaller
central conduction time
interpeak latency between wave I-V
*gives info about the transmission of the signal through the brain
L-I function for CHL
*with conductive HL need to correct the latency to see if the brainstem is okay, to do this subtract 0.1ms from latencies for every 10 dB of CHL
limitations to predicting the type of HL from L-I function
- individual variability with different degrees and slope of loss
- small intensity increments (10 dB) are necessary to describe the slope of funciton