Week 5: Classical Conditioning: Underlying Processes and Practical Applications Flashcards

1
Q

Stimulus-Substitution Theory

A

CS acts as a substitute for the US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Preparatory-Response Theory

A

The purpose of the CR is to prepare the organism for the presentation of the US, allows for difference between UR and CR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Compensatory-Reponse Model

A

A CS that has been repeatedly associated with the primary response (a-process) to an US will eventually come to elicit a compensatory response (b-process).
Ex: Heroin related cues -> increased blood pressure (homeostasis response to effects of heroin).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rescorla-Wagner Theory

A

A given US can support only so much conditioning, and must be distributed among various CS that are present.
Associative Value.
Supports overshadowing and blocking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Overexpectation Effect

A

The decrease in a CR that occurs when two separately conditioned CS are combined into a compound stimulus for further pairings with US. Cannot exceed certain associative value, therefore decrease their own to accommodate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Other explanations for the Little Albert situation

A
  1. Pseudo conditioning (sensitization & unknown objects)
  2. Required more trials and weakened more than most phobias.
  3. Thumb-sucking preventing fear response indicating weak conditioning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Temperment

A

An individuals level of emotional reacitivty - largely genetically determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Preparedness

A

Innate disposition to learn certain types of behaviours or certain types of associations more easily than others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Incubation

A

Strengthening of a conditioned fear response as a result of brief exposure to an aversive CS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

US Revaluation in phobias

A

Different valued US can alter strength of response to previously CS.
Observational learning, or verbally transmitted information.
Ex: Minor injury from skateboarding = minor anxiety, car accident creating a major injury = strong anxiety with skateboarding. Past association of injury and skateboard has higher value now.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Selective Sensitization

A

Increase in one’s reactivity to a potentially fearful stimulus following exposure to an unrelated stressful event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Counterconditioning

A

A CS that elicits one type of response is associated with an event that elicits an incompatible response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reciprocal Inhibition

A

Occurrence of one response can be inhibited by the occurrence of an incompatible response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Systematic Desensitization

A

Behavioural treatment for phobias that involves pairing relaxation with a succession of stimuli that elicit increased levels of fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Flooding

A

A behavioural treatment that involves prolonged exposure to a feared stimulus, thereby providing maximal opportunity for the conditioned fear response to be extinguished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Aversion Therapy

A

Treatment procedure that decreases attractiveness of a desired event by associating it with an aversive stimulus. Most effective when using biologically relevant aversive and desirable events.

17
Q

Covert Sensitization

A

An imagery-based form of aversive therapy.