Week 4 - Test 1 Flashcards
rules that are applied to resolve contract disputes and to determine parties’ intentions
Rules of Construction
6 basic components of a contract
- identifications
- recitals
- consideration
- definitions
- body
- signatures
4 things the identifications section of a contract includes
- title
- identity of parties
- how parties will be referred to
- date of signing
Use the (1) to get accurate, up to date information on companies
Office of the Secretary of State
short statement that provide background or explain the reasons for the contract ; not technically part of the contract
recitals
a reference to an outside document, making that document part of a contract
incorporation by reference
If including a list of (1), it is extremely important to use them consistently throughout the contract
defined terms
2 things thte body of the contract describes
- obligations of the parties
2. consequences of failure to meet those obligations
Signatures will have to be witnessed by a (1) if the contract will be (2). These can serve as (3) in court.
- notary public
- recorded
- testimony
person authorized by state to administer oaths, certify deocuments, attest to the authenticity of signatures, and perform other official acts
notary public
to file a document with the official charged with keeping documents such as deeds and judgments
record
complies with formalities and can serve as testimony in court
self-proving document
a writing, intended by the parties to be a final embodiment of their agreement, cannot be modified by evidence that adds to, varies, or contradicts the writing. Assumes that what went on before the writing of the contract is irrelevant.
parol evidence rule
final and complete agreement
integrated
contract provision stating that the document is the complete and final statement of agreement
merger clause
5 questions that should be asked regarding parol evidence rule
- Was the contract integrated?
- Does oral evidence contradict contract or clarify it?
- Does the oral evidence show some way the contract may be void or voidable?
- Was there a separate/subsequent agreement (supported by consideration)?
- Does evidence indicate the existence of a condition precedent, such that agreement may never have become effective?
a separate, later agreement that changes or modfies the original agreement
subsequent agreement
Rules of construction: In choosing an interpretation of a contract, courts generally favor the (1). They also favor an interpretation that results in an (2). (3) are very important in establishing intent.
- party who drafted the contract (generally the offeror)
- effective contract
- Previous dealings