Final - Ch. 6 Capacity Flashcards
A minor has no power to (1) a contract; after majority, the person can give (2) or (3) ratification stating he will not disaffirm the contract.
- ratify
- express
- implied
Attorney-in-fact
Person appointed to act in place and stead of another through an instrument called a Power of Attorney.
court has declared a person incompetent
adjudicated incompetent
Unlike disaffirmation of a contract with a minor, which can only be done expressly, (1) of a contract after 18 can be done (2) or (3).
- ratification
- expressly (in words say you want the contract to continue)
- impliedly (continue paying; do nothing to disaffirm)
Guardian ad Litem
A court appointed person to serve as an advocate, usually for a child, and to act in the best interest of that child during a specific hearing or specific litigation.
Two types of competency. The (1) looks for a total lack of understanding–the contract (2) even if it is fair. The (3) looks for a person who has some understanding of the transaction but is unable to act reasonably in relation to that understanding–usually someone is (4) in this situation.
- cognitive test (person buys a Rolex)
- voidable
- volitional test (person knows he needs a watch but gets talked into a Rolex - Purchase isn’t one a reasonable person would make)
- taking advantage
Question
Answer
3 people who are given special protection from contract mistakes in the form of a right to avoid the contract
- minors2. mentally incompetent3. some people under influence of intoxicating substances
(1) are viewed unsympathetically by courts in contract matters, the understanding is “your fault.” But courts are aware of (2). The contract may be voidable if (3) AND (4). In other words, the law does not protect (5), but does protect those who get (6).
- Intoxicated individuals
- alcohol/drug abuse
- the person was too intoxicated to understand the nature of the transaction
- the other party knows about the intoxication
- drunks
- taken advantage of
Mental incompetence relates to (1)–for dimentia sufferers, competence can differ from day-to day.
- when the contract is entered
If a minor improperly avoids a contract, courts are forgiving with minors as (1) and harsh with them as (2). Many courtrs require return of (3) but do not require (4). A minor may also not avoid a contract to (5).
- defendants
- plaintiffs
- consideration
- restitution (e.g., if minor crashes a car, dealer is out of luck)
- improve his position
Can a minor act as an agent?
Yes. If a minor acts as an agent for the benefit of an adult, the agent is party to the contract.
A cognitive test is easier when the person is (1) and has a (2) or (3).
- adjudicated incompetent
- guardian
- power of attorney
True or False:
The exception to contracting with minors, in which the person can legally get the value from the contract, is for necessities, which are food, clothing and shelter.
TRUE
Two things that must be proven with regard to necessities in enforceability of contract
- Was the item a necessity (determined by courts, matter of law)
- Was the item a necessity to the person (matter of fact)(e.g., a minor renting an apartment when her parents provide a home she is welcome in = not a necessity)
A person, the (1), who fears becoming incompetent will sometimes sign a (2) to appoint another to act as (3). A (4) remains valid despite principal’s loss of mental capacity.
- principal
- power of attorney
- agent
- durable power of attorney
In some states, (1), (2) or (3) may either give a minor capacity or make the minor liable for more necessities.
- marriage
- enlistment
- emancipation
incompetence has not been determined by a court (courts look at necessity and state of mind)(may have to make restitution if other person didn’t know)
non-adjudicated incompetent