Final - Ch. 8 - Statute of Frauds Flashcards

1
Q

3 possible exceptions to the suretyship writing requirement

A
  1. cosigner instead of guarantor (equally liable instead of agreeing only if primary defaults)
  2. promise to other signer to pay if he can’t (instead of to lender)
  3. equal benefit or more benefit for guarantor (Dad acts as surety for son on car but uses the car as much as he does)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 exceptions to the UCC’s “$500 or more” requirement

A
  1. goods specificlally manufactured for buyer, not suitable for sales to others + seller has made a substantial commitment
  2. party “trying to get out of it” admits in court agreement was made
  3. good have been received and accepted
  4. payment has been accepted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4 thigns needed to satisfy the “in writing” memo necessity under SoF

A
  1. reasonably identify parties and subject of contract
  2. indicate a contract has been made between the parties
  3. state with reasonable certainty the material or essential terms of the contract (no ambiguity)
  4. be signed by or on behalf of the party to be charged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

5 things that can satisfy te “signature” necessity under SoF

A
  1. printed signature
  2. typed signature
  3. actual signature
  4. initials
  5. X
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5 types of real estate transactions, all of which must be in writing

A
  1. real estate sales
  2. leases
  3. mortgages
  4. options on land
  5. easements (limited right to use real property)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

6 types of contracts that must be in writing accords to statutes of frauds

A
  1. Marriage - promises in anticipation of
  2. Year - cannot be performed within one
  3. Land - real estate contracts
  4. Estate debts - promises by an executor to pay
  5. Goods over $500 - sales of (UCC rule)
  6. Suretyship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

6 types of contracts under SoF

A
  1. Marriage (contracts in consideration of)
  2. Year (not doable within one)
  3. Land
  4. Estate debts (agreement to take on another’s)
  5. Goods (over $500)
  6. Suretyship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A (1)–designed to control transfer of property according to statute–is one example of a contract in consideration of marriage that falls under SoF. Another common example is (2), but to fall under SoF the promise must be made to the (3), NOT to (4)

A
  1. prenuptial agreement
  2. exchange of wedding assets
  3. bride or groom (making the marriage consideration toward the assets)
  4. each other (making the exchanges consideration for each other and conditional upon the marriage)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A deed does not have to be in writing under (1), but it does under (2).

A
  1. Statute of Frauds
  2. property laws (for tracking chain of title)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Any contract within the scope of the Statute of Frauds may not be (1) unless a (2) is written and signed by the (3).

A
  1. enforced
  2. memorandum (containing important parts of the contract)
  3. party to be charged (one against whom enforcement is sought) (defendant)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Any contract, irrespective of (1), must comply with the SoF if it cannot be (2) within one year of (3). Not applicable if performance within a year is (4), even if (5).

A
  1. subject matter
  2. performed
  3. execution (signing)
  4. possible
  5. unlikely
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

bond

A

a type of insurance policy in which the bonding company pays and then pursues the deadbeat debtor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Courts (1) the SoF wherever possible; many require it to be pled as an (2) or else it is (3). (4) to a contract may fall under SoF even if the actual contract does not.

A
  1. avoid
  2. affirmative defense
  3. waived
  4. Modification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Courts like to take agreements out of S of F territory. Most courts hold that if the Statute of Frauds is not raised as an (1), or if the party admitted in (2) or (3) that there is an agreement, it is waived. The Statute may not be raised after the contract has been (4) and may not be raised in some cases if (5). (6) may also excuse the need for writing.

A
  1. affirmative defense
  2. court
  3. court documents
  4. fully performed
  5. one party has performed
  6. Conduct consistent with existence of a contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Despite the L part of MYLEGS, (1) only have to be in writing if they are longer than a year

A

leases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does a book marked down to $450 from an original price of $900 fall under the SoF, requiring a contract in writing to be enforceable?

A

No. The marked-down price is under the $500 SoF threshold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does a contract that A promises B to pay B a pension for the rest of A’s life need to be in writing?

A

No. The person could die within a year, completing the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Does a contract to employ someone for life need to be in writing?

A

No. The person could die within a year, terminating employment and completing the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Does a contract to employ someone for two years need to be in writing?

A

Yes. It is not possible to perform two years’ work in one year.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Does a contract to take care of a person until death need to be in writing?

A

No. The person could die within a year, completing the contract.

21
Q

Does a covenant not to compete for two years need to be in writing?

A

No. The person could die within a year, ending the contract (any ability to compete).

22
Q

Does this contract need to be in writing?

A + B orally agree to marry

A

No. This is a promise to marry.

23
Q

Does this contract need to be in writing?

A Bride’s mother orally promises daughter that if daughter marry X then mother will give the couple $10k after the wedding.

A

Yes, it is not enforcable. This is not enforcable because it was an oral promise and is not in writing. It is in consideration of marriage, which NEEDS to be in writing.

24
Q

Does this contract need to be in writing?

Defendant promises Plantiff to pay Plaintiff $300 month for the rest of her life in exchange for Plaintiff droppinf lawsuit.

A

No. This is valid and it does not need to be in writing because this IS capable of being completed in one year (she could die within that year).

25
Q

Does this contract need to be in writing?

Father of prospective groom and Mother of prospective bride agree that IF marriage takes place, each of them will gove $10k to the couple.

A

No. IS enforceable and does NOT need to be in writing because the promises are the consideration; not the marriage.

26
Q

Does this contract need to be in writing?

In 2013, the president promises to make a speech at a college in 2016.

A

Yes. It must be in writing because it cannot be performed within one year of signing.

27
Q

Does this contract need to be in writing?

A couple owns a lot who is contracting for home to be build.

A

No. This there is no transfer of land here.

28
Q

Generally the signature can appear (1) on the memorandum, though some statutes require it to be (2).

A
  1. anywhere
  2. subscribed (at bottom; nothing afterward)
29
Q

It is immaterial for the party (1) to have signed the contract under SoF

A

seeking enforcement

30
Q

maintenance bond

A

warranty on a product to guaranty workmanship (e.g., promise to replace a faulty appliance)

31
Q

payment bond

A

a person needing a service (e.g., a house built) and uses a single contractor to coordinate–some of the sub-work may not be under his control (e.g., plumbing), but this ensure payment to the subcontractors to avoid them coming after the owner for a mechanic’s lien. In other words, this releases that lien.

32
Q

performance bond

A

if party does not perform according to contract, someone else will be brought in to finish/repair and the bond will pay for that

33
Q

Performance Bond, Maintenance Bond, and Payment Bond

A

Performance bond - guarantees that a contract will be performed according to its terms and specifications – type of surety (guarantor agrees to complete or to pay penalty for lack of completion)
-Maintenance bond -assures a project will remain free of defects in workmanship or materials for a specific period of time
-Payments bond - a person needing a service (e.g., a house built) and uses a single contractor to coordinate–some of the sub-work may not be under his control (e.g., plumbing), but this ensure payment to the subcontractors to avoid them coming after the owner for a mechanic’s lien. In other words, this releases that lien

34
Q

promise to guarantee the debt of another, made without benefit to the party making the promise (must be in writing–covers Estate and Suretyships of MYLEGS)

A

collateral promise

35
Q

The “within a year” requirement does not apply if the contract is (1) within this time, regardless of whether performance is (2) or (3) within a year. Also unimportant is whether performance within a year actually (4). Promises with (5) and promises with (6), on of which can be performed in a year, are not subject to the requirement. The time requirement is also based from time of (7), not from when performance begins.

A
  1. performable
  2. likely
  3. anticipated
  4. occurs
  5. uncertain duration
  6. alternatives (e.g., restitution per year–but it is possible the person may die within the year)
  7. agreement (2014 agreement to speak at Yale in 2016–subject to requirement)
36
Q

The consequences of non-compliance with the Statute of Frauds is (1), NOT (2)!

A
  1. unenforceability
  2. invalidity
37
Q

The E in MYLEGS regards someone responsible for carrying on the (1) of another, or the (2) of a deceased person. To take on the deceased’s (3) requires writing under S of F.

A
  1. estate
  2. finances
  3. debt
38
Q

The equivalent of promissory estoppel with regard to the SoF–one party relied on the unenforceable promise to his or her detriment

A

“unconscionable injury”

39
Q

The L part of MYLEGS applies both the (1) and to (2)

A
  1. sales of land
  2. disposal of interest (easements, etc.)
40
Q

The SoF is no longer in effect in its place of origin, (1), but remains in effect here everywhere except (2)

A
  1. England
  2. Louisiana
41
Q

The Statute of Frauds was made to prevent (1).

A
  1. perjury
42
Q

The UCC’s “$500 or more” requirement does not apply to (1).

A

services

43
Q

To fall under the SoF, a suretyship must be promised to the (1), NOT the (2). The SoF also does not apply if the guarantor promises to be (3).

A
  1. creditor
  2. debtor
  3. primarily liable (send me the bill for his car)
44
Q

Unenforceability due to Statute of Frauds does not preclude enforceability due to (1) and (2)

A
  1. quasi-contract
  2. promissory estoppel
45
Q

What estate debts need to be in writing to be enforcable?

A

Debts incurred by decedent prior to death

46
Q

What is the difference between a suretyship, which falls under SoF, and co-signing?

A

A suretyship is a guarantee to take on someone else’s debt only if the primary signer defaults and all remedies have been exhausted against him.
In co-signing, both signers are liable and responsible for paying if the other doesn’t.

47
Q

What was the ruling in the engagement ring/bounced check on CoD/click-wrap done by clerk example?

A

Contract unenforceable. Click-wrap = signing of contract, and this was not done by the consumer.

48
Q

When an email settlement was conducted by attorneys in the land dispute and the party challenged this settlement on the grounds of SoF, what was the ruling?

A

Yes to SoF because land. Yes enforceable because email signatures sufficed.