Week 4 - Planning and Strategy Flashcards
Goals
The focus that drives negotiation strategy
- Determining goals is the first step in the negotiation process
- Negotiators should specify goals and objectives clearly
- The goals set have direct and indirect effects on the negotiator’s strategy
Direct effects of goals on strategy
- Wants are not goals
- Goals are often linked to the other party’s goals
- Goals must be attainable
- Effective goals must be concrete, specific and measurable
Goals can be intangible or procedural - Intangible goals might include enhancing your reputation
Indirect effects of goals on strategy
Forging an ongoing relationship
Relationship-oriented goals should motivate the negotiator toward a strategy choice in which the relationship with the other party is valued as much as the substantive outcome
The Planning Process (1)
- Define issues
- Assemble the issues and define the bargaining mix (combined list of issues from each side)
- Prioritize issues based on.. which are least important, whether the issues are linked or separate
- Define interests (why you want what you want)
Interests may be…
Substantive (directly related to the focal issues under negotiation)
Process-based (related to how the negotiators behave as they negotiate)
Relationship-based (tied to the current or desired future relationship between the parties)
Planning process (3)
- Define limits (resistance point) and alternatives
- Set your targets and opening bids (where to start)
Target: is the outcome realistic expected
- setting targets requires positively thinking about own objectives, understanding how to package several issues, understanding trade-offs and throwaways,
Asking price: is the best outcome that one can hope to achieve
- Assess constituents and the social context of the negotiation
The social context of negotiation: field analysis
All key parties - bosses, superiors, other parties who will evaluate and critique, observers, indirect actors, opposing actors, environmental factors
Analyze the other party’s…
- Resources, issues and bargaining mix
- Interests and needs
- Resistance point and alternatives
- Targets and objectives
- Reputation and negotiation style
- Constituents, social structure, authority to make an agreement
- Likely strategy and tactics
Plan the issue presentation and defence
Define the protocol to be followed in the negotiation
The agenda
The location
The length
What might be done if negotiation fails?
How will we keep track of what is agreed to?
How do we know whether we have a good argument?
Strategy
The overall plan to accomplish one’s goals in a negotiation
Tactics
Short-term, adaptive moves designed to enact or pursue broad strategies
Tactics are subordinate to strategy
Tactics are driven by strategic considerations
e.g. integrative strategy? tactics: open-ended questions; active listening
Approaches to strategy
Unilateral: one that is made without active involvement of the other party
Bilateral: considers information about the other party, as well as the impact of the other’s strategy on the one’s own
The dual concerns model
Avoidance: Don’t negotiate
Competition: I gain, ignore relationship
Collaboration: I gain, you gain, enhance relationship
Accommodation: I let you win, enhance relationship
Alternative situational strategies
The choice of strategy is reflected in the answers to two questions:
How much concern do I have for achieving my desired outcomes at stake in the negotiation? - strong interest in substantive outcomes
How much concern do I have for the current and future quality of the relationship with the other party? - strong interest in relationship goals
The non-engagement strategy: Avoidance
- If one is able to meet one’s needs without negotiation at all, it may make sense to use an avoidance strategy
- It simply may not be worth the time and effort to negotiate
- The decision to negotiate is closely related to the desirability of available alternatives