Week 3 - Strategy and tactics of integrative negotiation Flashcards

1
Q

Overview of the integrative negotiation process

A
  • Create a free flow of information
  • Attempt to understand the other negotiator’s real needs and objectives
  • Emphasize the commonalities between the parties and minimize the differences
  • Search for solutions that meet the needs and objectives of both sides
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Recognize integrative situations

A
  • The negotiation includes more than one issue
  • It is possible to add more issues to the mix
  • The negotiation is likely to recur over time
  • The parties have varying preferences across the issues (negotiator’s must attempt to probe below the surface and discover underlying needs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key steps in the integrative negotiation process - claiming value

A

When a negotiator carves out their share of finite resources that are being negotiated (distributive approach)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Creating value

A

When parties with conflicting yet compatible interests trade low-priority issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pareto efficiency

A

Find the point where there is “no agreement that would make any party better off without decreasing the outcomes to any other party

Pareto efficiency occurs when an economy is most efficiently allocating its goods. At this point, no further changes to the economy can be made without one party benefiting and one party becoming worse off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Negotiator’s dilemma

A

Tension between engaging in competitive and cooperative behaviour in a negotiation

“No matter how much creative problem solving enlarges the pie, it must still be divided; value that has been created must still be claimed”

People try to create, but ultimately needs to claim as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interests

A

The underlying concerns, needs, desires, or fears that motivate a negotiator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Substantive interests

A

Relate to key issues in the negotiation

monetary or the key issues of the deal (paying for a product etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Process interests

A

Related to the way a dispute is settled

Where do we meet, when will we spend time talking - how long will you talk, how long will I talk
Who is talking, who’s going to get voice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Relationship interests

A

Indicate that one or both parties value their relationship

emotional interests/intangible/psychological
○ Who and how we get along
○ Do you appreciate me, are you understand me and apologize

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Interests in principle

A

Principle deeply held by the parties serving as the dominant guide to their actions (doing what is fair, right, acceptable, ethical, etc.)

Determining what’s fair and right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

More on interests

A
  • There is almost always more than one type of interest underlying a negotiation
  • Parties can have different types of interests at stake
  • Interests can change over time
  • There are numerous ways to surface interests
  • Surfacing interests is not always easy or to your best advantage (can unravel things - because only focusing on interests are distracting from the purpose)
  • Don’t spend too much time focusing on interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Key steps in the integrative negotiation process

A
  • Generate alternative solutions
  • Evaluate and select alternatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Alternative solutions

A
  • Expand the pie: add resources for both sides to achieve their interests
  • Log roll: find more than one issue in conflict and have different priorities for those issues - then agree to trade off among these issues
    ; If you don’t have many issues, unlink the issue - make one issue into multiple and then log roll

Non specific compensation: allow one person to obtain objectives and pay off the other person for accommodating interests

Cost-cutting: one party receives their objectives and the other’s costs are minimized if they agree

Bridge solution - invent new options and meet all their respective needs - disclosing sufficient information to discover their interests and then inventing options to satisfy them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluate and select alternatives

A
  • Narrow the range of solution options
  • Evaluate solutions on: quality, objective standards, acceptability
  • Agree to evaluation criteria in advance (learn to agree with one another before negotiations)
  • Be willing to justify personal preference (be open)
  • Be alert to the influence of intangibles in selecting options (psychological needs and emotional tells)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate and select alternatives (2)

A
  • Use subgroups to evaluate complex options
  • Take time to “cool off”
  • Explore different ways to logroll (exploit differences in expectations and risk/time preferences)
  • Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete (so you don’t lose flexibility because you made deals earlier)
  • Minimize formality/record keeping until final agreements are closed (allow free flow of information)
16
Q

Strategies that facilitate successful integrative negotiation

A
  • Create a common objective or goal (parties share equally)
  • Share this information: underlying interests, priorities and preferences, interpretation of key facts
  • Build trust
  • Make multiple equivalent simultaneous offers: come up with packaging that are equal in its value
  • Find the motivation and commitment to work together - but don’t over do it (you should have a healthy act of self-interest, but find the commitment to work together)
  • Try post-settlement settlements
  • Use clear and accurate communication
  • Understand the dynamics of integrative negotiation
17
Q

Common goals

A

Goals that parties share equally and both benefit from more than if not

18
Q

Shared goal

A

Goal that both parties work toward but benefits each party differently

19
Q

Joint goal

A

Involves individuals with different personal goals agreeing to combine them in a collective effort

20
Q

Constructing multiple equivalent simultaneous offers (MESOs)

A
  1. Make a comprehensive list of all issues to be negotiated
  2. Prioritize issues; assign a value to each option within each issue
  3. Create 2-3 packages with varying terms that collectively are of equal value to you
  4. When you present MESOs, let your counterpart know:
    a) you are going to make multiple offers
    b) each offer is of equal value to you
    c) you will give them time to consider the packages
21
Q

Pre-settlement settlement

A

Commitments made by parties before negotiations begin (we agree that whatever the outcome is, we will resolve it within 30 days, we agree that everything will be in writing etc.)

22
Q

Post-settlement settlement

A

Instead of agreeing to commitments upfront, negotiators reach a settlement and try to agree on improvement to the settlement afterward