Week 4: Cognition & Emotions: Evaluation: Interpretation and Appraisal Flashcards
A particular set of psychological interpretations of
the current situation.
Appraisals
Participants held a pen either with their teeth (mimicking a smile) or lips (mimicking sadness).
Those holding the pen with their teeth rated comics as funnier.
This challenges our intuitive understanding of emotions and suggests that bodily sensations play a significant role in shaping our emotional states.
Strack’s Pen Study
This theory states that our physical reactions to a stimulus precede and cause our emotional experience.
James-Lange Theory of Emotion
This theory suggests that emotional experiences and physiological changes occur simultaneously. In other words, when we encounter a stimulus, our brain processes the information and sends signals to both the body and the mind at the same time.
Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion
Emotions are a result of both physiological arousal and cognitive appraisal (interpretation of the situation).
The theory emphasizes situations where people are uncertain about the source of their arousal.
Schachter & Singer’s Two Factor Theory of Emotion
A psychological phenomenon where individuals incorrectly identify the source of their physiological arousal.
False Attribution Errors
Occurs when individuals experience unexplained arousal and look for external cues to label their emotional state.
Misattribution
Two Ancillary Positions of Schachter & Singer’s Theory of Emotions
1) Misattribution of Arousal: When people experience unexplained arousal, they look to their environment for cues to label their emotional state.
2) Appropriate Explanation: When people understand the source of their arousal, they are less likely to misattribute it to external factors.
A pioneering investigation of how emotions influence our appraisals of the world around us
Smith & Ellsworth’s Study (1985)
This research provides compelling evidence for the impact of emotions on decision-making.
Even when emotions might seem unrelated to a decision, they can subtly shape our perceptions and choices.
Lerner & Keltner’s Study (2001)
Occurs when people appraise events as harmful, threatening, or challenging, and these events are perceived to tax or exceed ones resources.
Stress
Trying to manage demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding one’s resources.
Coping
One of the most infl uential frameworks for understanding how people process potentially stressful experiences.
Appraisals can be separated into:
1) Primary Appraisal
2) Secondary appraisal
Lazarus’ Cognitive-Motivational-Relational Theory
Characterised by an assessment of whether the event is congruent with their own goals and how relevant the event is for themselves.
Primary Appraisal
An assessment of the options that are available to the person for coping with the event - especially when it is eliciting negative emotions - and what resources
are available to do so.
Secondary Appraisal