Week 4 Flashcards

1
Q

3 foundational studies that resulted in ethic codes

A

Submersion of ‘participant’ in ice cold water - Germany
Syphilis Study - Tuskegee, AL
Willowbrook Hepatitis - Staten island, NY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

TCPS

A

Tri-Council Policy Statement - a policy for ethical research that must be satisfied prior to completing any research in Canada.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 principles of TCPS

A

Concern for Welfare
Respect for Person’s
Justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What research is exempt from review in Canada?

A

Publicly available info, observing in public if anonymous and confidential, already collected (anonymous) data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Anonymity

A

No way to connect names to data (impossible to identify).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confidentiality

A

Individual response kept secret.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Concern for Welfare

A

Benefit outweighing harm (probability and magnitude).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Minimal Risk

A

No greater risk than would be experienced in their daily life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Informed Consent

A

Participants should be informed of all aspects of a study before they agree to participate.
Must be capable of informed consent, or assent with guardian’s consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deception

A

Mask study by withholding details of study (typical) or telling an outright lie (rare).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Process Debriefing

A

Describe psychological tendency to forget there was a deception and believe original ruse. Awareness can prevent belief perseverance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Funnel Debriefing

A

Ask series of questions that are progressively more leading and specific, and reveal deception. Reduce potential harm of participant feeling down.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Justice

A

Potential benefits and harms need to be evenly distributed across all participants in study OR all socitel groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Confederate

A

Someone pretending to be in a study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

REB & Composition

A

Committee responsible for reviewing research protocols for potential ethical problems.
Min. 5 people, 2 experts in relevant field, 1 knowledgable in ethics, 1 community member with no affiliation with institution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Full REB

A

Default requirement for research involving humans.

17
Q

Minimal Risk Research

A

When experiment doesn’t inflict anymore harm than that participant would experience on an average day.

18
Q

Scholarly Integrity involves:

A

Sharing data with researchers, giving proper credit, no plagiarism, fabrication, or republishing.

19
Q

How to identify and minimize risks:

A

List all potential physical, psychological, or confidentiality risks, seek input from a variety of people, prescreen, informed consent with emphasis on ability to withdrawal.

20
Q

Prescreening

A

Identifying and eliminating participants that are at a higher risk. This can be done by using inform consent (with withdrawal), collecting data on individuals, interview with psychologists.