Week 4 Flashcards
observational study designs
investigator measures or records events but does not intervene
descriptive study designs
ecological and case study designs
analytical study designs
cross sectional
case control
cohort
ecological studies
at least one variable (exposure/outcome) measured at group not individual level
S ecological studies
useful for generating hypotheses
compare same population at different times or at different places in same time
L ecological studies
ecological fallacy
associations not causations
link between exposure and effect at the individual level can’t be made
ecological fallacy
inappropriate conclusions are made about individuals from aggregated group data
cross sectional
defined population is observed at a single point in time or time interval and exposure and outcome are determined simultaneously
S cross sectional
data on all variables collected only once
can investigate multiple exposures at once
measures prevalence
L cross sectional
unable to measure incidence, only prevalence
unable to determine temporality
not suitable for rare diseases
difficult to identify causation
case control
two samples are selected, one case one control
look back and determine how many from each group have the risk factor
retrospective
S case control
investigates causes of disease (especially rare disease)
easy, fast, cheap
L case control
identifying and enrolling control subjects can be difficult
increased probability of recall bias, selection bias and measurement error since retrospective
prospective cohort study
start with people free from disease who are exposed/unexposed to factors
baseline data collected
see how many people develop the disease in each group
retrospective cohort study
investigators jump back in time to identify a useful cohort which was initially free of disease and at risk
then use whatever records are available to determine each subject’s exposure status at beginning of observation period and ascertain what happened to the subjects in these exposure groups