Week 3-Social Perception Attitudes and Attribution Flashcards
According to the Theory of reasoned action, the behaviour is influenced by…
Attitudes; Subjective norms and Intentions
When an attitude enables us to express who we are and what we believe in, it is likely that the attitude serves the following function…
Value Expressive
According to Jones and Davis (1965), we are more likely to infer a behaviour is caused by internal factors when…
Behaviour is Freely Chosen
What theories do we use to make sense of other’s behaviour?
1) The Naive Scientist-Heider
2) Theory of correspondent inferences-When do we infer traits from behaviour?
3) Kelley’s covariation model -How do we explain social events?
Kelly’s Covariation Model
Like Heider, Harold Kelley assumed that people behave like naïve scientists:
To develop theories about other’s behaviour, people search for covariation:
-Covariation = when 2 things happen together
People use principles of covariation to determine whether the behaviour is internally or externally caused.
Theory Correspondent Inferences (Jones and Davis)-When do we infer people’s traits from different people?
Theory described how we use others’ behaviour as a basis for inferring their stable dispositions.
-Act reflects some “true” characteristics of the person (trait, motive, intention, attitude)
Five sources of information/cues:
1) Freely chosen behaviour
2) Non-common effects
3) Socially desirable
4) Direct relevance to us (hedonic relevance)
5) Intention to affect us (personalism)
Walking in a room or streaking
Kelly’s Covariation Model
Like Heider, Harold Kelley assumed that people behave like naïve scientists:
To develop theories about other’s behaviour, people search for covariation:
-Covariation = when 2 things happen together
People use principles of covariation to determine whether the behaviour is internally or externally caused.
CONSISTENCY; CONSENSUS; DISTINCTIVENESS
- Consistency:How does the person act in response to the same stimulus over time?
- Consensus: How do other people act in response to the same stimulus?
- Distinctiveness:How does the person act in response to stimuli that are similar but not the same?
Kelly’s Covariation Model
Like Heider, Harold Kelley assumed that people behave like naïve scientists:
To develop theories about other’s behaviour, people search for covariation:
-Covariation = when 2 things happen together
People use principles of covariation to determine whether the behaviour is internally or externally caused.
CONSISTENCY; CONSENSUS; DISTINCTIVENESS
-Consistency:How does the person act in response to the same stimulus over time?
- Consensus: How do other people act in response to the same stimulus?
- Distinctiveness:How does the person act in response to stimuli that are similar but not the same?
Low consistency=Discounting-search for a different cause
High consistency+consensus+distinctiveness= external-attribution to the stimulus
High consistency+low consensus+low distinctiveness= internal attribution to the person
Biases in attribution
Fundamental Attribution Error (Ross, 1977):
-The tendency to overestimate the importance of the actor and to underestimate the situation as a determinant of action
Correspondence bias (Gilbert and Malone, 1995): -The tendency to not only infer internal causes for behaviour (as in the FAE), but to also conclude that those internal causes are stable (often, personality or attitudinal) characteristics of the actor
Biases in attribution
Fundamental Attribution Error (Ross, 1977):
-The tendency to overestimate the importance of the actor and to underestimate the situation as a determinant of action
Correspondence bias (Gilbert and Malone, 1995): -The tendency to not only infer internal causes for behaviour (as in the FAE), but to also conclude that those internal causes are stable (often, personality or attitudinal) characteristics of the actor
Actor-Observer Bias:The tendency to see other people’s actions as internally caused, and my own as situationally caused – even when explaining the same actions. (Jones & Nisbett, 1972)
Ultimate Attribution Error: (Hindu and Muslim attributions) (Pettigrew, 1979)-The tendency to assume that whole groups of whom one is not a member (out-groups) have similar, negative dispositions or personality characteristics that cause negative behaviour.
i.e., attributions can be not only self-serving but also in-group-serving. This links to stereotypes: schemas that assume that all members of an out-group behave in the same negative way for the same internal reasons
Why do we show attribution biases?
Cognitive factors-Behaviour more salient than background; More information about self than others; First assume dispositional cause and subsequently correct for situational forces
Motivational factors-People explain the world in ways that preserve positive identity (self, group)
Cultural factors-The explanations we produce are culturally bound
Culture and Attribution
Individualist cultures focus more on disposition than collectivist cultures; for example, self-serving bias is weaker in collectivistic cultures (Lee & Seligman, 1997)
White Americans more self-serving bias-WESTERN CULTURES a learnt tendencies
Miller-dispositional biases- culture teaches us
ATTRIBUTION
Like scientists, ordinary people want to understand and explain the world around them-Need to predict and control
Internal, external biases.
Broadly, when explaining behaviour, people ask:
Was it something about them?
Was it something about the situation they were in?
Explanations are not perfect. They are shaped by cognitive, motivational and cultural forces
What is an attitude? Define attitude
An attitude is a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of FAVOUR or DISFAVOUR (Eagly & Chaiken, 1998)
Evaluations we make of other individuals and groups, attitudes underly existing behaviour.
A relatively enduring organisation of beliefs, feelings and behavioural tendencies towards socially significant objects, groups, events, or symbols
(Hogg & Vaughan, 2010)
Tripartite model: BELIEFS; FEELINGS and BEHAVIOURAL TENDENCIES.
Affective = feelings about the attitude object
Behavioural = predisposition to act towards the attitude object in a certain way
Cognitive = beliefs about the attitude object
A three-component model of attitudes; generally attitudes based on these three elements
Functions of attitudes
1) Value-Expressive function
2) nstrumental function
3) Ego-defensive function
4) Knowledge function