Week 3 Lecture II Flashcards
Sufficiency definition
related to boundaries on energy services in order to keep global consumption within acceptable environmental limits while allowing for increasing demand in non-OECD countries: there was an onus on the affluent nations to bring about deep reductions in energy use
sufficiency not only limits damage but supports human and ecological wellbeing.
Efficiency: (-)
So it is possible for a building, vehicle or system to be highly energy-efficient while at the same time being highly energy-consuming.
SDGS about energy:
7 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.
energy (though without specific reference to services). The term ‘modern energy’ currently refers to electricity, clean fuels and technologies for cooking
8 Decent work and economic growth
There is not room to review it here, only to comment that it is reasonable to doubt whether there can be economic growth, as measured by the usual metrics of GDP etc, consistent with ecological sustainability (Jackson, 2011).
11 Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.
e built environment and transport systems, each of which constitute huge infrastructures of energy demand with the ability to shape and lock in patterns of consumption over long periods
12 Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
13 Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
16 Peace, justice and strong institutions.
political and procedural challenges of incorporating sufficiency into policy. Without strong and trusted legal frameworks and institutions, these challenges are likely to be insurmountable
The doughnut model
Planetary boundaries; based around the concept of universal human needs for a variety of goods, services and freedoms (water, income, education, resilience, voice, jobs, energy, social equity, gender equality, health, food), in line with the approach taken in setting the Sustainable Development Goals, and with Doyal and Gough’s (1991) theory of human need.
Critique of current economic thinking
transforming it into a discipline more capable of analysing the human condition and planning a better future
doughnut min max
(sufficiency as a restraint) and of minimum requirements (sufficiency as satisfaction, or ‘enough’)
The outer limits are large-scale, defined in quantitative terms, and rely heavily on expert judgement that has to be trusted by policy makers and underpinned by public support.
But the inner limits are minimum standards for human welfare in particular contexts, to be determined by some mix of expert and ‘lay’ judgement, using a mix of quantitative metrics and qualitative indicators.
There is little guidance on how to distribute available resources within the environmental boundaries of the doughnut; only that the distribution should be ‘just’.
It is assumed that everyone’s needs can be met within planetary limits, within an implied framework of liberal democracy where everyone has a voice.
actually describe the doughnut
picture
Defining energy sufficiency
Energy sufficiency is a state in which people’s basic needs for energy services are met equitably and ecological limits are respected.
What are ‘basic needs’?
Decision-makers inevitably have to face questions about where to draw the line between needs (and an imperative to meet them) and wants: what is essential and what might be desirable.
basic needs discussion:
whether human needs have any universal or objective features;
different approaches to - material and non-material necessities - absolute and relative norms - expert and public/’lay’ judgement about what are necessities.
physical health and autonomy
basic needs list
nutritious food and water;
protective housing;
a non-hazardous work environment;
a non-hazardous physical environment;
safe birth control and child-bearing;
appropriate health care; security in childhood;
significant primary relationships;
economic security;
physical security;
appropriate education.
means of satisfying these needs was culturally variable
welfare economics and preference satisfaction; hedonic psychology and happiness; and the capability approach developed by Sen (1999).
focussing not so much on what people have as on their state of being and what they can do (for example, being adequately fed, mobile and literate); on social arrangements as well as individual capacities (Robeyns 2006).
This proposes that individuals with more internal ‘capacities’ (e.g., education, mental health, physical strength) have more capabilities (more available choices, more freedom) and can fulfil more of their needs.
There is no upper limit on many of these capacities, though: at some point wants may again merge into needs and the environmental costs of meeting them become unsustainable.
environmental limits relate to
sources of energy for human use and the associated greenhouse gases and pollutants;
materials used in infrastructures of supply and demand (that is, everything from mines and power stations to pipes, wires, transformers, buildings, vehicles, roads, machine tools, heating systems and electrical appliances);
land and water used to provide energy services, whether this involves growing biomass, storing water for hydro generation or hosting mines and generating capacity.
There is a risk that focusing only on sufficiency in terms of demand reduction
takes attention away from the need to ensure adequate energy services for people who do not yet have them.
That is, sufficiency can be understood in terms of social wellbeing and equity.
When attention is focused on specific, conscious individual decisions and actions to change lifestyle
there is a danger of missing the unconscious, routine nature of many activities associated with energy consumption
Is energy sufficiency different from sustainable energy?
And it raises the difficult, unavoidable issue of distinguishing needs from wants.
Things to consider:
Scale – regional and local; bottom up
Timing - Networks are sized to deal with peak demand and ‘sharp’ peaks mean a lot of underused capacity: shifting usage away from peak times can be very valuable at system level (Pudjianto et al., 2014) but may reduce energy service levels at times (Bozarovski and Petrova, 2015). As renewables are integrated into electricity networks, a combination of demand, storage and supply need to be flexible and sufficient for agreed energy services at particular times and in particular places, as well as being sufficient to enable the whole system to operate effectively.
Equity - f growing income and wealth inequalities in the developed world; Greater public concern about inequity and fuel/energy poverty, if translated into political action, could assist in enabling more people to meet their basic energy service needs and in increasing equity (note that the first of these can be met without the second)
Technological development -
Demography – population; increase and decrease; household size
Policy
integrating thinking about systems of service provision and energy supply;
prioritising the use of ambient, untraded energy services (e.g. passive house design, natural cooling and ventilation);
valuing and enabling adaptive and non-expert ways of achieving comfort in buildings
developing skills and practical know-how for the above