Week 3 Lecture I Flashcards
‘grand narrative’ vs reality
Energy transitions involve long-term structural change and are generally presented and discussed in ‘grand narrative’ terms: low carbon, sustainable growth, smart systems.
Yet demand for energy services has always been highly distributed and local considerations are also becoming more prominent on the supply side, with developments in distributed electricity generation and heat networks.
Many older residents had experienced a transition
from belonging to fuel-producing communities and handling solid fuels to becoming ‘consumers’ in uneasy and uncomprehending relationships with distant suppliers of gas and electricity.
Their stories add texture to ‘grand narratives’ of energy transition, demonstrating, for a particular place and time, some of the complexity and path dependencies of energy systems and how they play out in social and distributional terms.
actors involved in the transition
They show how local resources, institutions, social networks and built environment can affect energy services and responses to them, highlighting the role of ‘middle actors’ in an energy advice service as guides to transition.
The title of this paper promised a tale concerning coal (geography, culture, local economy, resilience, community); steel houses (building materials and techniques); and the man in the moon (remoteness/ immediacy, communication, technologies).
main lesson to emerge from these West Lothian stories
even when energy supply is largely in the hands of large corporate businesses and regulated nationally, demand remains stubbornly localised, influenced by the state of housing, employment, income and the transfer of knowledge and skill between individuals and organisations.
Gas and electricity may be the same in any place
but they are not bought, used and understood in the same way in any place: housing, climate, demographics and social networks, all place-specific, are important in influencing how energy is captured and used.
This paper starts from two premises:
that energy transition operates at many levels or scales and can be understood at many levels; and that transition is not a uniform process but one influenced by both geography and history
personal stories
It offers extracts from residents and energy advisers’ accounts of energy transition in a particular locality and uses them to illustrate the value of personal and communal stories for energy research and policy.
In particular, the stories illustrate ways in which geography, history and politics have shaped the built environment and patterns of energy supply and demand, the impacts of change on relatively vulnerable citizens, and the role of energy advisers in helping them to cope
The paper demonstrates how
individual and localised stories can contribute to analysis of topics such as utility-customer relations and social adaptation to changing circumstances; and it supports the argument for attending to the role of ‘middle actors’ in energy transition [3], not least because of the interpretive skills of these actors and their ability to communicate between actors and channel resources.
To reduce fuel poverty:
improve access to information and advice and in particular raise
awareness of energy related matters
• increase household disposable income through either maximising income, ensuring
• maximum benefits take-up, or minimising expenditure by reducing fuel bills
• improve comfort levels in homes and therefore the health of the residents
• encourage landlords to adopt an effective policy on energy efficiency and fuel poverty
• promote the re-utilisation and conservation of resources’.
significance of the local authority employees as middle-actors
contributing knowledge and skills that would traditionally have been either unnecessary or provided by family and friends.
Four aspects of a home are distinguished:
a place for security and control,
for activity,
for relationships and continuity, and
for identity and values.
This can be valuable when evaluating how smart home technologies work in real homes, as well as in the more technical and prospective approaches to developing new socio-technical configurations
why people don’t want smart homes
Explanations for the reluctant homeowners are diverse but include questions of reliability, cost, control, privacy and security
crucial to smart home solutions is the
The active participation of citizens is considered crucial to this strategy and it is made clear that citizen participation and engagement form part of smart solutions in the home, although the documents tend to be vague about the form that this engagement should take
First is home as security and control.
In opposition to workplace, institutions and cities or wild nature, home is the place where you are in control and can feel safe, even though, or maybe precisely because, the home might be surrounded by a hostile society. The home in this understanding is thus also associated with a safe haven and a refuge from the surroundings. Després talks about security and control as one aspect of home and a refuge from the outside world as another aspect, whereas in our terminology we combine them into one as we see them as two sides of the same experience.
From a sociological perspective [3] it can, however, be objected that home is not always a secure place, for instance for abused women and children, and that, for example, many teenagers might not feel that home is where they are in control of their own lives. The importance of home as control and safety can maybe best be understood, paradoxically, when studying those who have to live in places which do not accommodate this notion of the home, such as marginalised people living in rooming houses
Second is the home as a site of activity,
either in the form of the many different activities of cooking, cleaning, eating and sleeping which constitute everyday life, or
in the form of actually working on and with the home, physically transforming the home to make it the place that best accommodates our activities and ideas. In the categories from Després [7], she mentions three different meanings of the home including the home as something to act upon and modify, the home as a centre of activity and the home as a material physical structure, whereas we in our approach combine these three into one aspect of the home as a physical place for activities.