Week 3 - Cosmology and Myth Flashcards
What are the 3 understandings of myths?
1) Something widely accepted but is really false
2) Stories which tell of heroic actions or “supernatural” events or forces of nature or gods or goddesses -> usually sacred, and believed to be true by people who see religious or spiritual significance in them
3) “Primitive” belief about nature and the universe; “Per-Scientific”
What are non-European myths usually described as?
Primitive; Prescientific
How is the Anthropological understanding of myths different?
Scholarly use doesn’t imply that the stories are true or false
Cosmology
deals with the order or structure of ultimate reality
Cosmogony
deals with origin of the structure or order or cosmology
Kosmos
universe or order (opposite of chaos)
Axis Mundi (Cosmic Axis)
central points/lines that connect world to spiritual realms
Myths are considered…
- true sacred stories
- that occured in the remote past
- have non-humans (gods, monsters) as prinicpal characters
- “presents in the form of a narrative the basic worldview of a society”
Worldview
- the way in wihch societies perceive and interpret their reality
- provides an understanding of how the world works
forms the template for though and behaviour - provides a basic understanding of the origin and nature of humans and their relationship to the world around them
What are the 7 subjects of myths
- cosmology and cosmogony - creation of world and humans
- cosmic catastrophes
- origins of institutions
- phenomena of birth and death
- relations to the gods w/ eachother and mortals
- hero/heroine quests
- trickster myths
Myth vs. Legend vs. Folktale
- Myth: fact about the remote past, set in a different world (other world, or earlier world), that’s sacred and usually involves non-humans (gods)
- Legend: fact about recent past, set in today’s world, that can be sacred or not sacred and usually involves humans (heroes)
- Folktale: fiction set in anytime or place, that’s not sacred and usually involves humans and non-humans
What are the 5 main anthropological approaches to myths?
- rationalist approach
- psychological approach
- functionalist approach
- structualist approach
- postmodernist approach
Rationalist Approach
myths interpret and explain natural events and forces (especially creation myths) but rationalist thinkers (Levy-Bruhl, Tylor, Frazer) believed myths were to be taken literally (no critical though)
Rationalist Approach to Trickster Myths: Napi and the Dogs
rationalistic explanation would suggest that the myth of Big Rock is literal truth to believers
What do trickster myths signify?
- shows that boundries of religion can be pushed
- have a morally gray character
Psychological Approach to Myths
- interpret myths as symbolic w/ symbolisim rooted in human nature and expressing individual or collective phenomenon
- the conflict btw societal constraints and biological nature -> symbolic representations of conflicts universal
According to Freud, “Myths are ___ ___ that represent ___ wishes - predominantly ___ in nature”
irrational stories; unconcious; sexual
According to Freud, why do our concious mind censor fantasies, desires, impulses etc.
bc they are dangerous
According to Freud, what are myths, in the context of psychology?
our concious mind’s way of dealing with internal struggles and thus deal with sexual hunger and guilt