Week 2 - Theories in the Anthropology of Religion Flashcards
Functionalism
- in 1900s the preoccupation with religion was replaced by other theoredical concerns
- questioning what the function of religion was
What are the 2 questions concerning functionalism?
1) What is the function of religion?
2) What does religion do for the people ans for social groups?
Emile Durkheim
French sociologist who explored the role of religion in shaping social cohesion and moral order
What were Emile Durkheim’s view on religion?
- atheist but believed that religion isn’t just an illusion or irrational, that the need for religion, rituals or myths are based on some type of human need
- wasn’t happy with Tylor’s definition that religion was the “belief in spiritual beings” and wanted a broader definition
Profane
the ordinary, everyday aspects of life not imbued with religious or extraordinary significance -> anything not sacred and could damage or pollute the sacred by contact
Sacred
- aspects of life reguarded as extraordinary, set apart and endowed with special significance or holiness
- a recognition of belief or power or force that evokes feelings of awe, reverance and respect
What makes something sacred?
not connection to the “divine” but prohibitions setting it apart from the profane
Totem
denotes an object, especially an animal, which is sacred to a clan, family, or social unit
Totemism
ppl have mystical relationship/kinship w/ totem, and is though to interact with a given kin group or individual and to serve as their emblem or group
Totemic Societies
societies whose social, religious, & cultural structures are based on totems and totemic practices
Why did Durkheim assume Totemism was the most basic original form of religion?
the “division of labour” in totemic societies weren’t divided as much and wererelatively “simple societies”
What was the special type of kinship clan members consider themselves bond together by?
not based on blood, but the fact they share the same last name
What is are names and totems usually based on?
animals
What does each totemic group have?
a collection of ritual objects
What are the 5 characteristics of Totemism?
1) often viewed as a companion, relative, protector, progenitor or helper
2) superhuman powers and abilities often ascribed to totems
3) not only offered respect or occasional veneration, but also can become objects of awe and fear
4) often prohibited from killing, eating, or touching, even as a rule to shun it
5) hereditary transmission
What makes a totem sacred?
- totemic emblem
- totemic entity
- human clan members
totemic emblem
- essential to totemic belief
- a design that represents the clan’s totemic identity
- confers sacredness to whatever it’s marked on
- marks the sacred from the profane
totemic entity
- animal or plant species
- dietary prohibition
What did Durkheim believe about totemic beliefs in regaurd to the sacredness of totems?
images, animals, and clan members all sacred in the same way, thus their sacred character is not due to sacred properties of one or the other, but derived from some common principle shared by all
What did Durkheim believe Totemism is actually about?
the clan itself and not the totemic entity or the emblem, that the expirences of the social group alone can generate in people intense feelings that sustain religion
What did Durkheim believe a totem was?
a god or a divinity, the symbol for the group of society -> therefore the god and society are one, and the power attributed to the totem is actually the power of society
What do Totems do?
- create a common center via representation, to and for a group
- create a shared set of values, mores, based in beliefs but also communal gatherings and ritual
- function to promote unity in totemic groups
What was Durkheim’s definition of Ritual?
a communal activity which not only gives members ideas and beliefs in common but operates at a lower and more instinctive level as well as through the psychological power of “effervescence”
Effervescence
intense, electrified, emotional energy one recieves from shared identity and unity from a collective ritual expirence
Collective Worship creates ….
a feeling of effervescence, invigorates the individual and produces energy and power in people
What is Durkheim’s definition of religion?
a religion constitutes the union of beliefs and rituals
Why did Durkheim believe that any definition of religion must exclude magic
bc magic is individualistic, insturmental and immanent
Why did Durkheim believe magic was individualistic and self-serving?
- magic doesn’t bind together those who adhere to it, nor unite them into a group leading a common life
- selfish and often involves rituals performed by individuals seeking to manipulate supernatural forces for personal gain or profit
why did Durkheim believe that magic was instumental?
- is seen as a means to achieve specific, practical goals, such as healing, fertility, or protection
- often characterized by a utilitarian or instumental approach to supernatual forces
Why did Durkheim belive that magic was immanent?
magical practices focused on immediate, tangible outcomes in the here and now, the supernatural forces are believed to be directly and immediately responsive to the magician’s actions
What were Durkheim’s characteristics of religion?
collective, unifying, trancendent
What were the 4 main critiques of Durkheim’s theories of religion?
1) too rigid separation between the sacred and the profane
2) many hunter gatherers lack corporate kin groups and totems but had religion
3) society’s not a homogenous entity, but divided into social categories based on sex, class, ethnic affiliation and religion
4) religious beliefs may have ideological function legitimating the domination of 1 group or class over another
Bronislaw Malinowski
known for pioneering field work with participant observations in particular long-term immersions -> Trobriand Islands, stumbling across long-term immersion -> got text about islanders: religion, sex, etc
What are the 2 main critques Malinowski had about Durkheim’s theory of religion?
- the most deeply religious moments come in solitude, in detachment from the world
- many strongly “effervescent” gatherings in tribal communities don’t neccessarly generate religious feelings (ex: gathering for trade purposes)