week 3: cognition Flashcards
Consumer decision-making into 3 sets
awareness set:
- inept (reject product based on nega info)
- incept (neutral)
- choice (product you choose from
unawareness set
bottom up
features of stimuli: stands out
top down
prior conceptual knowledge: bigger goals: love, happiness
declarative knowledge
meanings that consumers construct to represent important info they encounter in their environment (link between 2 or more concepts) see an apple, know it is an apple (it is learned)
-a piece of information that a person is aware of knowing, such as the author of their favorite book
episodic knowledge
based on occurred events
semantic knowledge
general world knowledge
procedural knowledge
cognitive representation of how to do things (riding bike)
-being aware of the steps needed to complete a task or a job
schema
network of interrelated meanings that represents person’s declarative knowledge about concept
script
network of knowledge that contains procedural knowledge
similarity vs theory based categorization models
similarity: bottom up: stimulus driven
theory: top-down: goal derived (breakfast)
3 different models of similarity-based categorization
- classical view: need to have all features to be part of category (strict)
- prototype view: need to look similar, doesn’t need to have all features (1 certain dog)
- exemplaar view: several exemplars are within category, so there a variety of representatives (dogs)
levels of generality
- superordinate category: abstract, fruits
- basic level category: apple
- subordinate category: finer distinction: Granny Smith apple
the higher the specificness, the less distinctiveness within 1 category
prototypically
= graded structure within categories
- range of prototypically (Car with 3 wheels is still a cars)
- can change over time: definition over time
new product to categroy
- straightforwards categorization
- assimilation (force within existing knowledge)
- accommodation (adjust existing knowledge)
- re-categorise (find new category)
- evaluate on attribute-by-attribute basis (look at every piece: takes a lot of effort, not much done)
Model of Anderson
- assimilation: unconfirmed expectation of performance create state of discomfort –> reduce discomfort by changing perception
- contrast: surprise lead to exaggeration of difference between expected and actual performance –> larger discrepancy
- assimilation contrast: the SIZE of the discrepancy determines how people deal with this. small –> within latitude of acceptance –> assimilation (latitude of acceptance). large –> not acceptable –> exaggerated (within latitude of rejection)