Week 2

Question 1

Hazard vs Risk

Answer 1

Hazard
is the potenital to cause / A hazard is something with the potential to cause harm
(e.g. when crossing a road cars are a hazard)

Risk
= likelihood x consequences

-> something additional (heavy machine is moving around) -> risk a person is in front of the machine, the driver can’t see the person

is the likelihood (probability) of harm taking place
(e.g. when crossing a highway, the risk of an accident) /

Question 2

Types of hazard

Answer 2

• physical hazards -> e.g. someone falls form a roof
• chemical hazards -> substances
• biological hazards -> substances
• psychological hazards -> hunman are getting sick because of stress
• environmental hazards

Question 3

Hazard of a container ship

Answer 3

• Weather
• collision
• human error
• technical issue
• grownding

Question 4

Formula risk

Answer 4

Risk = likelihood x consequences

Question 5

Hazard Switzerland

Answer 5

1. Cyber
2. Energy crisis
3. Business interruption (e.g. Gotthard tunnel, war)

The impact of the energy crisis is a new risk entry and a core concern for firms.

Question 6

Hazard Germany

Answer 6

1. Business interruption
2. Cyber
3. Energy crisis

Business interruption remains the top ris, while firms are also worried about the energy crisis.

Question 7

Hazard Australia

Answer 7

1. Natural catastrophe
2. Business interruption
3. Climate change

Natural catastrophe is the new top risk, drivne by events such as flooding, which resultetd in the country’s costliest-ever natural catastrophe

Question 8

Classifaction

Answer 8

Diversifiable Risk
* fire / flooding -> diversifiable

Undiversifiable Risk (e.g. inflation)

Question 9

Pure risk vs Speculative Risk

Answer 9

Pure risk
* can only be negative (property risk)
* Property risk, people risk

Speculative risk
* coud be a positive and negative risk
* economic / market

Question 10

Difference between
* Hazard riks
* Operational risk
* Financial risk
* Strategic risk

Answer 10

Hazard risk
Arises from property, liability or peronnel losss exposure
* fire, never positive

Operational risk
Arises form people, processe, systems or controls
* cyber attack

Financial risk
Arises form the effect of market forces on financial assets or liabilities
* change in electricity prices -> could be positive and negative

Strategic risk
Arises form trends in the economy and socitey
* missing a trend -> could be positive, only a hype

Question 11

Analytical Tools and Statistics in Risk Management
Measuring the effectiveness of risk prevention measures

Answer 11

We rarely can link safety decisions to individuals / specific accidents, However, we often can get aggregate results
-> Seatbelts saved an estimated 14,955 lives in the United States in 2017

Except when we can’t:
Antilock brakes (ABS) have zero net effect on fatal crashes, people think they can drive faster because the breaks are better

And sometimes the data are misleading:
since the introduction of steel helmets the number of head injuries has increased considerably … because before their introduction many of
those injured were killed outright

–> are we looking at the right thing

Question 12

Bow tie analysis

Answer 12

• what happens when we lost control and the hazard is releast -> what will happen then
• left side: threats -> how can we prevent this?
• rigt side: Cosequences -> how do we limit the extend of the consequences?

Question 13

Delphi method

Answer 13

we ask different experts one questions, then we write a factsheet and distribute this to everyone, but they don’t know which statement is from wich person -> Anonimity to avoid group dynamics

Question 14

How to avoid a catastrophe?
-> near misses

Answer 14

Near misses
There are often unremarked small failures that permeate day-to-day business but cause no immediate harm. People are hardwired to missinterpret or ignore the warning embedded in these failures.

Multiple near misses preceded every disaster and business crisis we studied and most of the misses were ignored and missread.

Question 15

How to avoid a catastrophe?
-> Cognitive biases conspire blind manager to the near misses

Answer 15

Normalization of deviance (Abweichungen)
* the tendency over time to accept anomalies (Unregelmässigkeiten)

Outcome bias
* When people observe successful outcomes, they tend to focus on the results more than on the complex processes that led to them. Whenn people observe a successful outcome, their natural tendency is to assume that the process that led to it was fundamentally sound, even when it demonstrably wansn’t.

Question 16

How to avoid a catastrophe?
-> latent errors and enabling conditions

Answer 16

Latent errors often exist for long periods of time before they combine wiht enabling condtions to produce a signifcant failure. Wheter an enabling condition transforms a near miss into a crisis generally depends on the chance; thus, it makes little sense to try to üredict or control enabling conditonts. Instead, companies should focus on identifiy and fixing latent errors.

Question 17

How to avoid a catastrophe?
-> Seven strategies can help mangers to recognize and learn from near misses Managers should.

Answer 17

1. Heed High Pressure: be on alert when time or cost pressure are high
2. Learn form Deivations: watch for deviations form the norm, do not think it is an acceptable risk
3. Uncover the deviations’ root causes: don’t correct the symtoms, correct the cause
4. Demand Accountability: hold themselves accountable for near misses, don’t downgrade the importance of near misses
5. Consider worst-case scenarios: people tend to not to think through the possible negative consequences of near misses
6. Evaluate projects at every stage: look for near misses masqueradin as successes
7. Reward indivdiuals for exposing near misses