Week 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Systematic literature review

A

strict ‘search and analysis protocol’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Meta-analysis

A

this merges the results of earlier quantitative studies and presents a quantitative analysis for those

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Narrative literature review

A

the goal is to inform research and demonstrate the gaps in the existing knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why a narrative literature review?

A
  • Can help you to refine the research ideas
  • To obtain insight on your topic/RQ
  • To make sure you’re not repeating previously done work
  • To position your own research within the existing body of knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Two methods to organize your sourches

A
  • Mindmap
  • Relevance tree
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Academic literature

A

About exploring the theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Professional literature

A

About exploring the practice

E.g.: managerial problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of academic literature

A
  • Conference and working papers
  • Articles in academic journals
  • Academic books
  • Theses and dissertations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Five steps systematic literature search

A
  1. Build an information pool
  2. Apply filters to reduce the pool size
  3. Perform a rough assessment of sources in order to reduce the pool size
  4. Analyze literature in the pool
  5. Refine filters or stop the search
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Snowballing

A
  • Reference tracking
  • Citations tracking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of professional literature

A
  • reports and white papers
  • professional journals
  • newspapers
  • social media
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Good literature quality

A
  • Relevance
  • Quality
  • Sufficiency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Different types of claims

A
  • Exploratory studies: how large/frequent/important certain things are
  • Theory-building studies: how concepts relate to each other
  • Theory-testing studies: wheter hypothesis needs to be rejected
  • Decision science studies: what the optimal decision of system design is
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Academic article quality

A
  • Number of citations is high
  • transparently
  • reflections on methodological quality and demonstrated effort to ensure it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Academic journal quality

A
  • check journal rating
  • ERIM journal list
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Professional literature quality

A
  • Look at the author
  • Does it discuss alternative points of view
  • How is the language
17
Q

Components of critical approach

A
  • Critique of rhetoric
  • Critique of tradition
  • Critique of authority
  • Critique of objectivity
18
Q

Critique of rhetoric

A

assessing language and the validity of the argumentation

19
Q

Critique of tradition

A

being skeptical of standard assumptions and views in literature review

20
Q

Critique of authority

A

questioning commonly used theories or expert opinions and searching for alternative explanations/opinions

21
Q

Critique of objectivity

A

recognizing potential bias and limitations in objectivity of sources and oneself while writing

22
Q

Different forms of critical review

A
  • Integrative review
  • Theoretical review
  • Historical review
  • Methodological review
  • Systematic review
23
Q

Type 1 error

A

False positive

24
Q

Type 2 error

A

False negative