Week 2 Flashcards

1
Q

name the 3 cognitive treatment approaches.

A
  1. remedial/deficit specific approach
  2. functional approaches
  3. integrated/multicontext approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

name the 3 functional cognitive treatment approaches.

A
  • adaptation (indirect)
  • task specific training
  • compensation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • emphasis on improving and restoring the underlying impairment
  • repetitive practice of impaired skill
  • graded hierarchy
  • predetermined hierarchical treatment sequence
  • abstract tasks out of context
  • learning principles (practice, repetitions, verbal feedback)
A

the remedial approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what do assessments for the remedial approach identify?

A

specific cognitive deficits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what type of approach is the remedial approach?

A

bottom-up approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

in the remedial approach, ____ to other tasks which require the use of the skill is assumed to take place spontaneously

A

generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • emphasis on changing task performance rather than underlying skills
  • minimizes or reduces use of impaired skills
  • based on pessimism regarding recovery of function
A

the functional approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

modify the environment

A

adaptation approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

also could be referred to as the indirect approach

-increase or decrease the saliency of environmental stimuli or cues

A

adaptation approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name 3 ways of using the adaptation approach.

A
  • create cues in the environment to enhance function
  • reorganize or rearrange the environment
  • design or create new environments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

name 6 examples of environmental adaptations.

A
  • clothes pre-chosen
  • items for lunch/dinner pre-organized
  • programmed alarm messages
  • introduce one task or task step at a time
  • work task directed by another person
  • adaptation of the house
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

name 2 examples of matching task and environmental demands to person.

A
  • identify task components with ability range (wipe table, fold napkins)
  • identify environmental factors which optimize function
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • direct training of functional task
  • repetition with vanishing cues
  • combined with behavioral and errorless learning techniques
  • capitalizes on procedural learning: “how to”
A

task specific training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

name 3 task specific functional training methods.

A
  • divide tasks into sub-steps
  • count number of tactile, verbal, visual cues for each sub-step
  • gradually fade cues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what 2 things are not required for task specific functional training?

A

insight and generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • task methods are changed
  • may include use of external aids
  • awareness and acceptance are prerequisites
  • learning and generalization are required.
A

compensation approach

17
Q

what 2 things are required for the compensation approach?

A

learning and generalization

18
Q

describe the continuum of the functional approach.

A

adaptation - no change in person, task specific training, compensation - change in the person is expected

19
Q
  • directed at changing the person’s abilities while simultaneously adapting the task and environment to be at the just right challenge level.
  • addressing the person, task, and environment
A

dynamic: multicontextual approach

20
Q

what type of assessment is the AR?

A

functional cognitive assessment

21
Q

why did OTs not assess and treat cognitive impairments historically?

A

thought other professions should do it

22
Q

what are the current national and professional policy priorities?

A

AOTA has argued that an interdisciplinary performance based screening approach should be implemented for individuals categorized as unimpaired on the CAM and the BIMs

23
Q

what is the most basic level in the hierarchy of cognitive skills?

A

attention (if we can’t attend we can’t do anything else)

24
Q

what does the remedial approach assume?

A

assumes automatic generalization and transfer of skills

25
Q

name 4 strengths of RehaCom.

A
  • can grade up or down
  • a lot of data can be obtained very easily through it
  • can work on a lot of different cognitive impairments at once through a singular program
  • easy to administer
26
Q

name 2 limitations of RehaCom.

A
  • no evidence that spontaneous generalization exists

- the measurement is very much associated with the treatment - could lead to practice effect (priming)

27
Q

change the method of the task, the environment or the task itself to help the person perform the task as independently as possible

A

functional approach

28
Q

which populations would benefit from the task-specific approach?

A
  • people with dementia

- people with severe cognitive impairments

29
Q

which type of memory is the last to go?

A

procedural memory

30
Q

name 4 strengths of the task-specific approach.

A
  • can prepare them for specific skills that they may need when they return home
  • strength-based - preserve what they do have
  • client-centered
  • very occupation-based
31
Q

name 4 limitations of the task-specific approach.

A
  • only focuses on one task
  • only one person - no groups
  • not always adaptable
  • designed for people in the community - not usually used for acute or subacute care (could also be a strength)
32
Q

involves someone changing something for themselves on their own

A

compensation approach