Week 16: Sikolohiyang Pilipino and Pantayong Pananaw

Question 1

Key Thinker:

Answer 1

Zeus A. Salazar

Question 2

The proponent of this rather new theory of Pantayong Pananaw is the historian and anthropologist,

Answer 2

Zeus Salazar

Question 3

“From-us-for-us perspective”: A communication-based framework whose aim is to produce a “national” discourse (“talastasang bayan”)

Answer 3

Pantayong Pananaw

Question 4

“Sikolohiyang Pilipino: A Legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez

Answer 4

Rogelia Pe-Pua and Elizabeth Protacio-Marcelino

Question 5

anchored on Filipino thought and experience as understood from a Filipino perspective

Answer 5

Sikolohiyang Pilipino

Question 6

to foster national identity and consciousness, social involvement, and psychology of language and culture. It is thus concerned with proper applications to health, agriculture, art, mass media, religion, and other spheres of people’s daily life.

Answer 6

Sikolohiyang Pilipino

Question 7

Enriquez sought out to define Sikolohiyang Pilipino, it’s major characteristics as well as the roots or antecedents of Sikolohiyang Pilipino:

Answer 7

(a) Empirical philosophy, academic-scientific psychology, the ideas and teachings of Ricardo Pascual, logical analysis of language
(b) Rational philosophy, the clerical tradition, phenomenology, Thomistic philosophy and psychology
(c) Liberalism, the Philippine propaganda movement, the writings of Philippine heroes Jacinto, Mabini and del Pilar, ethnic psychology

Question 8

anchored on Filipino thought and experience as understood from a Filipino perspective

Answer 8

Sikolohiyang Pilipino