Week 12 - Transition Elements Flashcards
periodic trend in transition metals
- size does not vary by much
- Zeff does not change much
- IE increases to the right in period 4, not in others
Oxidization number of an atom
charge that the atom would have if the electrons were transferred completely to/from bonded atoms
how to assign oxidation number
- atom in elemental form = 0
- monatomic ion = ion charge
- sum of ON values of atoms in a molecule = 0
- sum of ON values of atoms in a polyatomic ion = charge of the ion
atoms/groups with specific oxidation numbers
group 1 = 1
group 2 = 2
H = 1 with nonmetal, -1 with metal or boron
O = -2 in most cases
group 17 = -1 in most cases
transition metal ions colour and reason
often highly coloured and/or paramagnetic due to unfilled d-subshells
low oxidation vs higher oxidation states
low oxidation states are more metallic / ionic, higher oxidation states are more covalent
coordinator compound
transition metal center, neutral or anionic ligands (written inside square brackets)
ligand
molecules or anions with one or more donor atoms - each donor atom donates a pair of electrons to the metal ion
coordination isomers
same compound formula, but different composition of the complex ion
geometry vs isomers
linear - none
square planar - can
tetrahedral - can
naming a coordination compound
- metal first, then ligands
- counter ions go outside square brackets
- cations first, then anions
- alphabetical order
- if ligand contains a prefix (like ‘di’, then use bis-, tris-, tetrakis-, pentakis-)
- roman numerals denote oxidation number of central metal ion
- if -ve charge, ‘-ate’ added to metal (iron special ending: ferrate)
- if +ve charge just write as normal
give name of each neutral ligand: NH3, H2O, NO, en, CO
ammine, aqua, Nitrosyl, ethylene diamine, carbonyl
give name of each anionic ligand: Cl-/F-, NO2-, CN-, OH-, C2O42-
chloro/fluoro, nitro, cyano, hydroxo, oxalato
crystal field theory (CFT)
describes the breaking of orbital degeneracy in transition metal complexes due to the presence of ligands
strong field ligands
more electron density, more repulsion of the particular d orbitals, higher energy difference as compared to ‘weak field’ ligands
magnetic properties of coordination compounds
anything with unpaired electrons is magnetic, but few unpaired electrons is only weakly magnetic