Week 11-Addiction Interventions Flashcards

1
Q

What do Treatments for substance use disorders generally consist of?

A

-Pharmacological treatments for substance use vary in their mechanism of action, either blocking the effects of the substance on the brain, blocking an enzyme that builds up after consuming the substance (e.g., ALDH) or replacing the substance (e.g., nicotine)

-Pharmacological treatments do not address psychological or social/environmental reasons for substance use e.g., alcohol dependence tends to stem from a maladaptive coping mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do Treatments for Opioid use disorders, AUD and Smoking cessation focus on?

A

Opioid:
-Treatments focus on blocking opioid receptors such as naltrexone
-OR replace with a less addictive opioid such as methadone

AUD:
-Treatments like naltrexone blocks opioid receptors, reducing the release of dopamine and making alcohol consumption less pleasurable
-Treatments like Disulfiram builds up of acetaldehyde which leads to nausea, vomiting, tachycardia and dizziness

Smoking cessation:
-Treatment focuses on replacing the nicotine smokers receive from smoking with nicotine delivered in a different form (e.g., nicotine patches or gum, e-cigarettes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the Social Basis for Heroin Use during the Vietnam War?

A

-Many soldiers became regular users of heroin during the Vietnam war

-Robins et al. (1974) - out of a sample of 450 enlisted men who returned to USA, 43% reported opiate use in Vietnam

-8-12 months after returning to USA, 10% reported any level of Heroin use, 1% reported becoming re-addicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why was there a reduction in heroin use with the soldiers from the Vietnam war?

A

-Not due to accessibility issues as p’s could obtain heroin with ease (Heroin is an opiate)
Reasons included:
-Fear of becoming addicted
-Experiencing adverse health effects
-Being arrested
-Disapproval of friends and families (Social acceptability lower in USA than Vietnam)

Other differences included:
-Price of drug
-Purity of drug
-Social acceptability of drug use
-Smoked rather than injected (due to purity in Vietnam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Biopsychosocial Model?

A

World <—–> Person

Social systems:
-Society
-Community
-Family

Psychological systems (experience and behaviour):
-Emotion
-Cognition
-Motivation

Biological systems (genetics and physiology):
-Organs
-Tissues
-Cells

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some Biological Treatments for Opioid Use?

A

Opioid Antagonists:
-Antagonists (such as Naltrexone) binds to receptors and prevents an agonist (e.g., heroin) from binding to that receptor
-Works by blocking euphoric effects of opioids and suppresses opioid cravings
-Often used for those who have already stopped taking the opioid and are no longer dependent on the substance

Opioid Agonist Therapy:
-Treatment which administers a substance to substitute for a stronger agonist opioid (e.g., heroin)
-Works by preventing withdrawal and reduces cravings for opioid drugs

Agonist-Occupies and activates receptor
Antagonist-Occupies receptors but does not activate them. Block activation by agonists

-In the UK we move patients to methadone rather than heroin as an agonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Naltrexone?

A

-Naltrexone is a medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat both Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and AUD

-Available in a pill from AUD or as an extended-release intramuscular injectable for OUD (Can be injected into your arm and releases small doses)

-Naltrexone is not an opioid, not addictive and does not cause withdrawal symptoms with stop of usage

-Naltrexone is a pure opiate antagonist and has little or no activity SAMHSA (2023)

-Naltrexone competitively binds to such receptors and may block the effects of endogenous opioids. This leads to the antagonisation of most of the subjective and objective effects of opiates, including respiratory depression, miosis, euphoria and drug craving.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the evidence for the effectiveness of Naltrexone as a treatment?

A

Minozzi et al. (2011) reviewed 13 studies (N=1158):
-Compared oral naltrexone vs placebo or no pharmacological treatment
-Findings: no significant difference for opioid abstinence
-However, issues with data - only 28% of participants retained in treatment
-Authors conclude that the available data did not permit an adequate investigation of the efficacy of oral naltrexone

Originally used as a treatment for alcohol use disorder. (AUD).

-Oral naltrexone is different to when it is injected in your arm

-72% dropped out (retention bias-why are these people dropping out?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Minozzi et al. (2011): What might have lowered retention and what are the side effects of oral naltrexone?

A

Form of administration:
-Oral naltrexone should be taken 3+ times per week
-Only the long-acting formulation is FDA approved as a medication for OUD

Side effects:
-Difficulty sleeping, anxiety, nausea, headaches (among others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Opioid Agonist Therapy?

A

A treatment which administers a substance to substitute for a stronger agonist opioid (e.g., heroin)

2 main drugs prescribed for OAT:
1. Methadone - Methadone is an opioid analgesic indicated for the management of severe pain that is not responsive to alternative treatments. Also used to aid in detoxification and maintenance treatment of opioid addiction (Drugbank, 2023).

  1. Buprenorphine - A partial opioid agonist used for management of severe pain that is not responsive to alternative treatments. Also used for maintenance treatment of opioid addiction (Drugbank, 2023)

-Heroin is 10x more potent than methadone whereas oxycodone is 100x stronger than heroin (Drug in US)

-These help them to get off the stronger opiates as they’re safer and have fewer effects on the respiratory system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How effective is Opioid Agonist Therapy?

A

-As with heroin, methadone interacts with opioid receptors in the brain

Mattick et al. (2009):
-Methadone maintenance therapy vs no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence
-6 RCTs demonstrated that methadone appeared more effective than non-pharmacological approaches in retaining patients in treatment and suppressing heroin use (RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.56-0.78)

-Risk to patients on methadone is opioid overdose death and this is elevated within the first 2 weeks of methadone treatment (Degenhardt et al., 2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Psychosocial Treatments: What are the strategies of CBT?

A

-Identification of both inter and intrapersonal triggers which may cause relapse

-Training to develop coping skills

-Drug-refusal skills training (Drug-refusal skills training is a big one as will power may be high but accepting it off someone else might not be)

-Function of analysis of substance use

-Increase of non-use related activities

Types of triggers targeted by CBT:
1. Cognitive
2. Affective
3. Situational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychosocial Treatment: What is Motivational Interviewing?

A

-A form of counselling involving a meeting between a client and counsellor

-The counsellor aims to understand how the client feels about the substance abuse problem - support is given for clients to make their own decision

-Discussion of possible consequences of altering or maintaining behaviour

-Discussion of client goals and how far/close client is to obtaining those goals

4 Main Principles (i.e., why it might work):
1. Express empathy - seeing world through client’s eyes (Empathy is important due to stigmas so can go a long way)

  1. Support self-efficacy - client held responsible for carrying out actions to change
  2. Roll with resistance - counsellor does not fight client resistance
  3. Develop discrepancy - perceiving discrepancy between where they are and where they want to be
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Psychosocial Treatments: What is Contingency Management?

A

-Individuals are reinforced/rewarded for positive change in behaviour

-Often used in substance use treatments e.g., the incorporation of a monetary reinforcer for a negative drug sample

-Recommended by UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

-Voucher-based reinforcement therapy (a type of contingency management) shown to be effective in the treatment of substance use disorders (Lussier et al., 2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Amato et al. (2011) find when reviewing Psychosocial and Pharmacological treatments combined?

A

-Reviewed the effectiveness of psychosocial intervention in combination with agonist maintenance treatment vs agonist treatment for opiate dependence

-Reviewed 35 studies (N=4319) included 13 different psychosocial interventions

Found no evidence that psychosocial interventions improved:
-Retention in treatment (RR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.98, 1.07])
-Abstinence of opiates (RR = 1.12, 95% CI [0.92, 1.37])

-From a psychological viewpoint it is looking quite weak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Rice et al. (2020) find when reviewing Psychosocial and Pharmacological treatments combined?

A

-Did an updated systematic review comparing opioid agonist therapy only vs. OAT + psychosocial therapy

-Reviewed 72 RCTs

Key findings:
-No difference between the 2 groups for opioid use and opioid abstinence
-Reward-based interventions (e.g., contingency management) + OAT more effective than OAT alone for treatment retention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why might studies show a lack of enhanced effectiveness of psychosocial and pharmacological treatment combined and what could be done about this?

A

-Typically psychosocial treatments for SUDs (including OUD) involves following a therapist manual

-This can limit the amount of flexibility for tailoring treatments to the patients’ preferences

Alternative approach- Case-formulation approach:
-Involves selection of interventions through discussion with the patient - focuses on identifying cognitive, affective, interpersonal factors which may maintain the disorder
-Focuses on the psychological roots

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Marsden et al. (2019) do in their study investigating psychosocial treatments for opioid use?

A

-Individuals from the UK who were seeking opioid agonist therapy were recruited and allocated to either the psychosocial intervention group (psychosocial + OAT; N=136) or the control group (OAT; N = 137)

-Participants in the psychosocial intervention group completed a case formulation with a psychologist

-Toolbox of methods: CBT, contingency maintenance, 12-step group facilitation, engagement of partners and/or family members in participants’ treatment

-Lasted for 12 weeks

-Primary outcome: AT 18 weeks after condition allocation - treatment response (i.e., no reported use of opioid use in past 28 days, negative urine test over same period)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What were the key findings in Marsden et al’s (2019) study?

A

-PDA = percent days abstinent in last 28 days

-WSAS = work and social adjustment scale

-Psychosocial intervention increased odds of greater PDA and WSAS scores after 18 weeks compared to control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Why do people drink alcohol? (Cox & Klinger, 1988)

A

People drink alcohol for various reasons:
-Biological (drinking is rewarding)

-Psychological (drinking is enjoyable)

-Social/Environmental (peer drinking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What Psychosocial Treatments are there for AUDs?

A

-A range of treatments exist which focuses on psychological processes

Many overlap with psychosocial treatments of other disorders (such as OUD):
-CBT
-Motivational interviewing
-Family/social support
-12-step intervention programmes (e.g., alcoholics anonymous)

12-step:
-Self-help group lead by professional or former alcohol dependent

-Offers a model of abstinence for those recovering from alcohol dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing and Substance Abuse? (Smedslund et al., 2011)

A

-59 studies (N=13,342) - 29 studies measured alcohol abuse

-Compared motivation interviewing to no treatment

-A significant effect on substance use - strongest at post-intervention (immediately after the intervention had finished)
-Significant effect also shown for short and medium-term follow-up

-Importantly though, no significant differences shown between motivational interviewing and treatment as usual for substance use disorders

-This treatment does work well but starts having less of an effect as time goes by

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How effective is CBT for alcohol and drug disorders? (Magill & Ray, 2009)

A

-Meta-analysis including 53 controlled trials using CBT

-Participant were adults diagnosed with alcohol or illicit drug use disorders

-CBT shown to produce a small effect (hedges g = 0.154, p <.005)

-The effect size diminished as follow-up period increased

-6-9 months follow-up – hedges g = 0.1, p <.005
-12 months follow-up – hedges g = 0.096, p <.05

-The effect of CBT was greatest when comparison was with a no-treatment control (hedges g = 0.796, p <.005).

-Psychosocial treatment great during intervention, has an effect with follow up but less after

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How effective is CBT for alcohol and drug disorders? (Magill et al., 2019)

A

Examined 30 RCTs, testing the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy on alcohol-use and substance-use disorders.

CBT vs minimal therapy:
Showed moderate and significant effect size

CBT vs non-specific therapy/treatment:
Showed effect for consumption frequency and quantity at early follow-up (but not late follow-up).

CBT vs specific therapy (e.g., motivational interview, contingency management):
Nonsignificant difference across outcomes and follow-up time points.

Conclusion – CBT more effective than no treatment, minimal treatment, or non-specific control, but not specific therapy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Psychosocial Treatments: What is involved in Self-help groups and how effective is it?

A

-Self-help treatments include alcoholics anonymous

-Involves group meetings

Ferri et al. (2006):
-Investigated the effectiveness of alcoholics anonymous and other 12-step programs on changes in alcohol-related outcomes compared with other psychosocial interventions

-8 trials (N=3417)

-Shown to have similar effectiveness of reducing drinking measures compared with other psychosocial interventions (i.e., is an effective treatment)

26
Q

What did Klimas et al. (2018) find comparing psychosocial treatments on alcohol-related outcomes?

A

CBT vs 12-step program:
-No difference in alcohol abstinence between conditions after 1 year

Motivational interviewing vs treatment as usual:
-No difference in alcohol use between groups

Brief motivational interviewing vs assessment only (have they got the SUD or not):
-More participants in the motivational interviewing group reduced alcohol use than the control group

Intensive motivational interview vs motivational interviewing:
-No difference between groups in alcohol use

27
Q

What is the Biological basis of treatments for AUDs?

A

Because alcohol affects multiple aspects of brain activity, treatments have been developed that work in different ways:
1. Blocking the opioid receptor system (Naltrexone)
2. Pairing drinking with negative biological effects (Disulfiram)

28
Q

How effective is Naltrexone? (Rosner et al., 2010)

A

-Reviewed 50 RCTs with 7793 patients. Naltrexone reduced the risk of heavy drinking to 83% of the risk in placebo (Risk Ratio = 0.83; CI[0.76;0.90])

-The authors conclude that although small treatment effects, these should be valued against the relapsing nature of alcoholism

-The ability to reduce the risk of heavy drinking is achieved with this

29
Q

How effective is a biopsychological approach which combines pharmacological and psychosocial treatments? (Ray et al., 2020)

A

-Meta-analysis included 30 studies (15 studies focused on alcohol use disorder)

-Combined CBT and pharmacotherapy was associated with increased benefit vs usual care and pharmacotherapy (hedge’s g ranging from 0.18-0.28)

-Effect size was greater when looking only at AUD

-CBT alone did not perform better when compared with a specific therapy

30
Q

How does Disulfiram (Antabuse) work?

A

-Disulfiram blocks the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)

Ethanol (alcohol) + Alcohol Dehydrogenase= Acetaldehyde

If Acetaldehyde not metabolised it can cause - Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, Tachycardia

-Disulfiram stops Acetaldehyde + ALDH —> Acetate so causes a build up of Acetaldehyde

-This leads to a Disulfiram ethanol reaction (DER) leading to symptoms above

31
Q

How does Disulfiram reduce drinking?

A

-Drinking leads to unpleasant effects quickly because Disulfiram blocks the liver’s ability to break down the ALDH into acetaldehyde - changing the patient’s beliefs about the effects of alcohol

-Disulfiram combines a biological mechanism of action with a psychological mechanism of action

  1. Disrupting metabolism of alcohol
  2. Changing beliefs and thoughts about alcohol consumption
32
Q

How effective is Disulfiram? (Skinner et al., 2014)

A

-Systematic review compared the efficacy of Disulfiram to various control groups

-They included 22 trials (N=2414) patients

-Patients given disulfiram did better than control groups on a range of outcomes

Skinner also tested:
-The effect of being supervised when taking disulfiram
-The effect of knowing you are receiving disulfiram (open label) compared to being blind to condition on treatment effectiveness

33
Q

What is the effect of Supervised vs Unsupervised treatment?

A

-In 12 studies patients were supervised when taking Disulfiram by either a family member, friend or clinic staff; in 8 studies there was no supervision

-Supervised treatment had a significant effect on outcomes

-Unsupervised treatment did not have a significant effect on outcomes

34
Q

Why should we have Blind vs Open-label designs for RCTS for Disulfiram?

A

-In most RCTs, we want patients to be blind to condition, because if they know what condition they are in there could be demand characteristics (performance bias)

-However, because Disulfiram has its effects by creating negative beliefs about taking the treatment, unless pateints know that they are taking it, there may be no effect!

35
Q

What differences were seen in blind or open-label designs when taking Disulfiram?

A

-Blind design (K=7) = patients don’t know they are on Disulfiram

-Open-label design (K=15) = patients know they are on Disulfiram

-For blind designs, there was no difference in outcome between the Disulfiram groups and control groups

-No difference may be due to beliefs of a hangover not changing beliefs on alcohol

-For open-label designs, there was a difference between the Disulfiram groups and control groups

36
Q

How safe is Disulfiram? (Skinner et al., 2014)

A

-Skinner et al., found that while patients taking Disulfiram were more likely to suffer adverse events overall, there was no difference in the mortality rate between patients taking Disulfiram and patients in the control groups

-Overall, Skinner et al., state that they view Disulfiram as fairly safe, although there are a lot of potential side effects e.g., Tachycardia (increased heart rate)

37
Q

Why do people smoke? (Shahab & West, 2010)

A

People smoke for various reasons:
-Biological (nicotine is rewarding)

-Psychological (smoking is enjoyable)

-Social/Environmental (peer smoking)

38
Q

How can rates of smoking be decreased by changing the environment?

A

-Smoking ban introduced in England July 2007 by prohibiting smoking in workplaces and enclosed public places

-The ban had a positive impact on health due to reduced exposure to second-hand smoke

-It also reduced levels of tobacco consumption and increased quitting of smoking (Hackshaw et al., 2010; Hargreaves et al., 2010)

-Hackshaw et al. (2010) - smoking quit attempts greater in July 2007 (8.6%) compared with one year later (5.7%) - Increase in quitting behaviour shown in this study equivalent to over 300,000 additional smokers in England attempting to quit

Hargreaves et al. (2010) - reasons for reduction in consumption:
-Inconvenience of going outdoors to smoke
-Concerns of experiencing disapproval if seen smoking

39
Q

Why is it hard to quit smoking?

A

-Inhaling nicotine is associated with dopamine release, which is reinforcing

-Over time nicotine receptors attach themselves to neurons in the brain, leading smokers to crave nicotine to promote dopamine release

-Quitting smoking is hard because smoking stimulates dopamine release, which is rewarding

40
Q

What are NHS Stop Smoking Services?

A

NHS Stop Smoking Services comprises of several elements designed to support smokers to quit:
-Smoking cessation medications: Nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, varenicline
-Group or one-to-one meetings with a stop smoking advisor

-Most smokers want to quit, however, when they try to quit find they relapse and take up smoking again, for the reasons we just discussed.

-This does not stop smokers from trying to quit without support

-It has been claimed that only 5% of quit attempts without support lead to long-term smoking cessation, hence the need for products that can boost successful quitting attempts.

41
Q

How effective are NHS stop smoking services? (Bauld et al., 2009)

A

-Reviewed 20 studies that tested the effectiveness of NHS stop smoking services

-They found a quit rate of 53% at 4 weeks

-Which dropped to 15% at 1 year

-While this is a dramatic fall over time, it is estimated that quitting without support only leads to 5% success

-Shows difficulties to quit

42
Q

What is Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)?

A

-NRT is used to help smoking cessation by replacing the nicotine inhaled from cigarettes

-NRT products were first licensed in the USA in 1984

43
Q

How effective is NRT? (Hartmann-Boyce et al., 2018)

A

-Cochrane review of RCTs analysed 133 studies (N=64,640) to compare quitting among groups receiving any form of NRT (gum, patches etc.,) with non-NRT control group

-Cochrane reviews are some of the best systematic reviews

-They estimated that the Risk Ratio (RR) of quitting for any form of NRT, relative to control was 1.55 [1.49, 1.61]

-This means that smokers using NRT have a 55% higher chance of quitting relative to smokers not given NRT

44
Q

What side effects does NRT have to make it unpopular?

A

Side effects of gum:
-Nausea
-Hiccups
-Irritation of the mouth

Side effects of the patch:
-Skin irritation
-Dry mouth
-‘Weird’ dreams

However some people just apply too many patches

45
Q

Patient Beliefs: What did Vogt et al. (2008) measure when studying the unpopularity of NRT?

A

Study 1 reported interviews with 27 smokers (9 men; 18 women, M age = 46) about NRT

  1. Access to NRT
  2. Desirability of using NRT
  3. Effectiveness of NRT
46
Q

What several barriers to accessing NRT did patients believe? (Vogt et al., 2008; study 1)

A
  1. NRT perceived to be expensive (not all patients were aware that NRT is available on prescription)
  2. Patients were concerned about how long it would take to make a GP appointment to get a prescription
  3. Others believed they would be wasting time waiting around for GP appointments
47
Q

What were patient beliefs about the desirability of NRT? (Vogt et al., 2008; Study 1)

A

Found that patients associated taking NRT with the following side effects:
-Skin reactions
-Feeling unwell
-Mouth pain
-Bad taste
-Bad dreams

-Some patients believed taking NRT would be like swapping addiction to cigarettes smoking to addiction to NRT

-Some patients viewed quitting using NRT as admitting to being ‘weak-willed’, and quitting in this way would diminish the achievement

48
Q

What were patient beliefs about the effectiveness of NRT? (Vogt et al., 2008; Study 1)

A

Reported that patients were unsure NRT would stop them craving cigarettes:
-“I am slightly unsure [NRT] would actually work…because I know people who had nicotine patches but then have gone back to smoking because…it has not stopped the cravings”

They also found that patients were certain NRT would not address psychological reasons for smoking cigarettes:
-“It [NRT] would cut down the craving…but other times out of boredom or stress…when you want to do something with your hands…I can’t see it helping”

49
Q

What are E-cigarettes?

A

-Electronic cigarettes

-Nicotine is inhaled in a vapour instead of smoke

-Use of E-cigarettes do not burn tobacco - users are not exposed to same number of disease-causing chemicals vs conventional smoking

-Referred to as vaping

50
Q

What did Hartmann-Boyce et al. (2022) find when investigating the effectiveness of E-cigarettes for smoking cessation?

A

-Reviewed 78 studies (N=22,052)

Findings: In RCTs there was high certainty that those randomised to nicotine e-cigarettes had higher quit rates vs those randomised to NRT (RR=1.63, 95% CI[1.30, 2.04])

-Equivalent to additional 4 quitters per 100
-Moderate certainty that there was no evidence in adverse effects between 2 groups

Findings: behavioural support only/no support vs nicotine e-cigarettes resulted in higher quit rates in the e-cigarette condition (RR= 2.66, 95% CI [1.52, 4.65])

-Some evidence that non-serious adverse effect more common for nicotine e-cigarettes
-Most commonly reported adverse effects of e-cigarettes were: throat/mouth irritation, headaches, cough, nausea - although these often disappeared with continued use

-Those side effects are normal in smoking anyway just needed to report it for the paper

51
Q

How safe are E-cigarettes?

A

Taken from the World Health Organisation Website:
“There are many different types of e-cigarettes in use, also known as electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and sometimes electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS). These systems heat a liquid to create aerosols that are inhaled by the user. These so-called e-liquids may or may not contain nicotine (but not tobacco) but also typically contain additives, flavours and chemicals that can be toxic to people’s health.”

Marques et al. (2021) – review of the impact of e-cigarettes on health (see lecture slide notes or reference list)

52
Q

What benefits can Group counselling offer for treating smoking cessation?

A

-Social learning: sharing knowledge and skills about different behavioural techniques

-Opportunity to share problems/experiences with others attempting to quit

-Providing mutual support

53
Q

How effective is group counselling vs 1-to-1 counselling?

A

-Included in Bauld et al’s (2009) where 2 studies compared group vs 1-to-1 counselling

-Judge et al. (2005) found smokers who received counselling more likely to quit (OR = 1.38; CI [1.09;1.76])

-McEwan et al. (2006) found that 30% of clients receiving group treatment vs 19% of clients receiving 1-to-1 treatment were abstinent at 4 weeks

-Bauld et al. note that group sessions are not attractive for many smokers and may not be feasible to deliver in rural areas

54
Q

What was found in Stead et al’s (2017) review of group vs self-help?

A

-Cochrane review comparing group therapy with 1) self help 2) brief support from a healthcare professional and 3) individual counselling

-Outcome was abstinence at 6 months

-13 trials (N=4395) compared group programmes to self-help (Risk Ratio = 1.88; CI [1.52; 2.33])

-Smokers who received group therapy were 88% more likely to be abstinent at 6 months than those who used self-help

55
Q

What was found in Stead et al’s (2017) review of group vs 1-to-1 counselling?

A

-14 trials (N=7286) compared group programmes to brief support from a healthcare provider (Risk Ratio = 1.22; CI [1.03, 1.43])

-Smokers who received group therapy were 22% more likely to be abstinent than those receiving brief support from health care professionals

-6 trials (N=980) compared group programmes to intensive individual counselling (Risk Ratio = 0.99; CI [0.76;1.28])

-No difference between group and intensive individual counselling

56
Q

What conclusions can be brought from Stead et al’s (2017) Review?

A

-Behaviour therapy programme delivered in group aids smoking cessation

-Effect strongest when comparing group therapy vs individual self-help programme

57
Q

Is smoking cessation better with combined treatment?

A

-Pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation have a clear mechanism of action 🡪 NRT replaces the nicotine that smokers get from smoking cigarettes

-However, there are also psychological, social/environmental reasons for why smokers smoke; reviews show the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments is increased when delivered in combination with counselling

-Stead et al. (2017) show that group counselling significantly increased abstinence rates relative to trying to quit alone.

58
Q

What type of Psychedelics could be used as an emerging alternative treatment?

A

Old School:
-LSD
-Psilocybin
-DMT
-Mescaline
-Salvia

New School:
-2C-B
-NBOMes

59
Q

What early studies have there been for psychedelics?

A

-Originally a research area for drug dependence treatment from 50s-70s

-Results were promising however there was a lack of rigor and controls

-Johnson et al., (2014) ran a pilot study with 15 participants. First study to look at treating tobacco dependence specifically

Study:
-15 week course (included CBT)
-Psilocybin administered in weeks 5, 7 and 13
-Participants read a motivational statement for quitting smoking prior to each dose
-During session, participants were encouraged to lie down on a couch and focus on their internal experience. Participants wore an eye mask and listened to a music program through headphones

60
Q

What were the findings of Johnson et al’s (2014) pilot study?

A

-11 of these 12 self-reported quitting smoking on their TQD and demonstrated biologically verified smoking abstinence throughout the following 10 weeks of active treatment.

-The missing participant had to leave the country for business, and was therefore unable to undergo a third psilocybin session, or provide CO and urine samples for weeks 6–10 post-TQD.

-3 of these 12 participants reported self-corrected lapses1 (consisting of 1, 4, and 48 cigarettes) during the 16-week period between end of treatment and 6-month follow-up.

-Another participant reported a relapse after 13 weeks of continuous abstinence, smoking an average of 5 cigarettes/day for 14 weeks (compared with a mean of 19 cigarettes/day at intake), but resumed smoking abstinence prior to 6-month follow-up, as biologically confirmed.

61
Q

What did Johnson et al., (2017) find about psychedelics?

A

-All 15 participants completed a 12-month follow up
-10 were abstinent (66.67%)

-12 returned for a long-term follow up (mean 30 months post TQD) - 9 were smoking abstinent (60%)

-Most effective smoking cessation medications demonstrate less than 31% abstinence at 12 months post-treatment (Hay et al., 2008; Tonnesen et al., 2003)

62
Q

Why is psychedelic treatment more efficacious than typical pharmaceutical interventions?

A

-Biological response prompts an intense psychological experience

-Doesn’t aim to just quell drug withdrawal and craving at the receptor level

-The intense psychological experience allows for deep introspection

-Almost purely pharmaceutical/biological (meaning most treatments are that)

-Attempts to deal with the problem at the receptor level

-Very little inclusion of psychological treatments