Week 1 Chapter 3 - DN (incomplete) Flashcards
Learning Goal 1.
Describe the purposes of diagnosis & assessment
Diagnosis
- enables accurate communication between clinicians about cases & scientists about research
- important for research on causes & treatments
Assessment
- helps make a diagnosis
- provides information beyond the diagnosis
p.63
Learning Goal 2.
Distinguish the different types of reliability & validity
Reliability - Consistency of measurement
- Internal Consistency reliability
- Interrater reliability
- Test-retest reliability
- Alternate-form reliabiltiy
Validity - degree to which an instrument measures what it is supposed to measure
- Content validity - how well test items relate to domain of interest
-
Criterion validity - compared current measure to some other measure in an expected way
- Concurrent validity - measured at same time
- Predictive validity - future measurement
-
Construct validity - *theory related - compares particular attribute with existing data (or theory) of the same construct (e.g., anxiety) *
- Convergent validity - data aligns with existing as expected
- Divergent validity - data differs from existing as expected
Learning Goal 3.
Identify the basic features, historical changes, strengths & weaknesses of the DSM
Learning Goal 4.
Describe the goals, strengths, weaknesses of psychological & neurobiological approaches to assessment
Learning Goal 5.
Discuss ways culture & ethnicity impact diagnosis & assessment
What important concepts play a key role in diagnosis & assessment?
- Reliability
- Validity
p.63-64
How does the focus of Reliability differ to that of Validity?
-
Reliability
- group of scores (are they consistent or repeatable)
-
Validity
- the test (does it measure what it says it measures)
Describe the relationship between Reliability & Validity?
- a measure with poor reliability will also have poor validity
- as an unreliable measure is inconsistent, it will not relate strongly to other measures (i.e., as required in construct validity (convergent/divergent)
on the other hand
-
good reliability does not guarantee good validity
- (i.e., a measure could be consistently innacurate)
p.64
Contrast convergent validity and discriminant validity? What are both of these used for?
- Both are indicators of Construct validity which is ‘theory related’ (i.e., data from a new instrument/measure is compared to that of an existing instrument/measure)
-
Convergent validity shows a relationship where one is expected
- (based on existing theory/evidence)
-
Discriminant validity shows little/no relationship where little/no relationship is expected
- (again based on existing theory/evidence)
-
Convergent validity shows a relationship where one is expected
How do Construct validity & Criterion validity differ?
Construct validity
- a test is evaluated against a wide variety of data
- multiple sources
**Criterion validity **
- a test is evaluated against one piece of data
p. 65
What has DSM-IV-TR’s, Axis V (Global Assessment of Functioning Scale GAF) been replaced with in the new DSM-5?
- Rating scales of severity along a continuum (specific to each disorder)
p. 69
Why does the DSM-5 continue to use symptoms as the basis for disgnosis?
- Our knowledge base is not yet strong enough to make diagnoses based on etiology
- No laboratory tests, neurobiological markers or genetic indicators are yet available for use in diagnosis
p.69
Give an example of one way DSM-5 reflects our growing knowledge of etiology/comorditiy?
OCD has been moved from the Anxiety disorder grouping and a new chapter has been introduced including:
- Obsessive-compulsive disorder
- Hoarding disorder
- Body dysmorphic disorder
This was done based on etiology seeming to involve distinct genetic & neural influences (differing to other anxiety disorders)
p. 69
What are the broad changes in DSM-5
- Changes to Multiaxial System
- Organising Diagnoses by Causes
- Inclusion of Continuous Severity Rating (supplementing Categorical Classification)
- Changes in Personality Disorder Diagnoses
- New Diagnoses
- Combining DSM-IV-TR Diagnoses
- Clearer Criteria
- Ethinic & Cultural Considerations in Diagnoses
p.69-73
How has the Muliaxial system changed in the DSM-5?
- 5 axes of DSM-IV-TR are reduced to one for psychosocial & environmental problems
- Codes for this axis have changed to be more similar to ICD
- International Classification of Diseases (World Health Organisation)
- Axis V removed
- instead severity scale developed for each disorder
p.69
How does a dimensional system of diagnosis differ to a categorical classification system?
Which of these systems is used in the DSM-5?
- A dimensional system describes the degree of an entity that is present
- (e.g., 1-to-10 of anxiety, 1 represents minimum & 10 the extreme)
- A classification system - considers presence or absence of a condition
- it does not consider continuity between typical - atypical behaviour
- DSM-5 incorporates the dimensional system but has also preserved the categorical approach to diagnosis
- i.e., the categories are supplemented by a severity rating for each disorder
p.71
Why are categorical systems so popular?
- the cut-offs provide a threshold (although arbitrary)
- offering doctors guidance for treatment
p.71