week 1-8 Flashcards

1
Q

NORMATIVE RESEARCH

A

study of what OUGHT to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

A

study of what IS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ONTOLOGY

A

what is the nature of the social world and what are its constituent parts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EPISTEMOLOGY

A

what is knowable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Positivism

A

social world same as natural world - can use same methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ontological assumptions-P

A

no difference between social and natural world -objective reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Epistemological assumptions-P

A

scientific knowledge is limited to what we can actually observe -law like generalisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

INTERPRETIVISM

A

scoial world not same as natural world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ontological assumptions-I

A

scientific knowledge about social world can only be gained through interpreting meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

EPISTEMOLOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS-l

A

scientific knowledge about the social world can only be gainede through itnerpreting meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

OPERATIONALISATION

A

theories involve concepts - CONCEPTS DEFINED TO MAKE THEM MEASURABLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY

A

artificial experimental settings MAY NOT GENERALISE TO WORLD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

POPULATION VALIDITY

A

experiments often involve UNREPRESENTATIVE subject pools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

REACTIVITY

A

people may change behaviour when they know they are being observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

observational research design

A

researcher does not have control over values of the INDEPENDENT VARIABLE - good for description , explanation , variability in terms of internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

experimental research design

A

experiments , a research design in which researcher both CONTROLS AND RANDOMLY ASSIGNS VALUES OF THE INDEPDNENT VARIABLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

internal validity vs external

A

degree to which we can be confident that a study identifies the causal effect of the independent on the dependent variable

EXTERNAL-degree to which findings can be GENERALISED to other contexts

18
Q

types of observational design

A

TIME SERIES - over time , not over diff units
CROSS SECTIONAL-different countries , not over diff units
PANEL - over time and cross units - but same unit over time
REPEATED CROSS SECTIONS- over diff cross units and over time buyt not same units
TIME SERIES CROSS SECTIONAL-over time over cross units , and same units - SAME AS PANEL

19
Q

LARGE C DATA

A

numbers quantitative scientific realism high standardization

20
Q

scientific realism

A

small c number meaning , quantitative +qualitative numbers stats words high or average standardization

21
Q

interpretivist small c

A

data expressed as meaning , qualitative , words , low standardisation

22
Q

LEVELS OF MEASURMENT

A

NOMINAL- categories without any natural order e.g type of political system
ORDINAL-data arranged in a meaningful order , but intervals between rankings may not be equal, e.g level of interest
INTERVAL-numeric scales with equal intervals between values but no true 0 point e.g put yourself on scale 1-10
RATIO - TRUE 0 point , numeric scales with equal intervals e.g number of protests

23
Q

LARGE C RESEARCH

A

less intensive study of a large number of cases using quantitative methods- avoids sample selection bias - selection on dependent variable
-typically deductive
-inc potential for generalizability
-inc ability to identify causal effects
-less useful for inductive research , interpretivist
SAMPLING strategies
- probability sampling- random - leverages law of large numbers
-non probability sampling

24
Q

SMALL C RESEARCH

A

-intensive study of a single case or small number of cases
-qualitative methods
-good for causal mechanisms , inductive research , thick description

25
case selection in descriptive case studies ?
TYPICAL AND DIVERSE CASES
26
case selection in large c research - total population sampling
-select all cases in a population e.g census high external validity
27
simple random sampling / probability sampling
-leverages law of large numbers representative all cases drawn from pop with same probability randomly
28
stratified random sampling -probability sampling
populations divided into relevant strat then drawn at random from different strat
29
non probability sampling- convenience sampling methods
convenience sampling - volunteer , snowball quota sampling - surveys -cannot be generalised to population but high internal validity if rely on experimental designs to rule out confounders
30
Ways of tackling confounders in observational studies
-statistical control -most similar and most different designs -time changes observations
31
observational research design ? what is it good for ?
Researcher does NOT have control over values of **independent variable** -DESCRIPTION QS AND EXPLANATIONS QS
32
experimental research designs
researcher both **controls** and **randomly assigns** values of the INDEPENDENT VARIABLE to the participants -deductive
33
types of experiments
laboratory , field ,survey
34
special case : natural experiments
observational design
35
TYPICAL CASES
one or multiple cases which represent a larger population well on important features -strategy when goal is description
36
diverse cases
-populations often diverse
37
case selection in explanatory case studies
-inductive studies -testing of causal hypothesis -mechanism studies
38
inductive studies - case section techniques
explanatory **search for new explanations** for a phenomenon EXTREME CASES , DEVIANT , MOST SIMILAR , MOST DIFFERENT
39
CASE SELECTION: most similar design + most different extreme and deviant cases crucial cases
1- minimum of two cases which similar in terms of background conditions but **differ in terms of X OR Y** 2-extreme - unusually values in **Y** deviant -one or multiple cases which deviate from a common causal pattern 3-Most LIKELY - EASY test that if fails cast as **strong doubt on theory** ,least likely = HARD test that if passes provides **strong evidence for theory**
40
causal hypothesis - common case selection techniques
DOES X CAUSE CHANGE IN Y crucial cases , most similar cases , most different cases
41
mechanism studies
exploration or testing of causal mechanism common case selection - pathway cases