Wave 2 Flashcards
wave 2 was between the years
2007 - 2012
wave 2
defining the problem and measurement
What was the focus of the National Crusade for Quality in Health Care?
The focus was on measuring the magnitude of the patient safety problem and providing a structure for focal points at various levels, including national, state, and hospital medical units.
At what levels did the National Crusade for Quality in Health Care provide a structure for patient safety focal points?
The structure was provided at three levels:
National level.
State level.
Hospital medical unit level.
Which international initiative did Mexico join as part of its patient safety efforts?
Mexico joined the World Health Organization (WHO) initiative as part of its patient safety efforts.
Which countries did Mexico collaborate with in the Ibero-American Adverse Events Study?
Mexico worked with four other countries in the Latin American region and Spain’s Ministry of Health to develop the Ibero-American Adverse Events Study.
What was the purpose of the Ibero-American Adverse Events Study?
The purpose of the study was to measure the magnitude of adverse events in healthcare settings and to collaborate on improving patient safety across the participating countries
What region did Mexico work with for the Ibero-American Adverse Events Study?
Mexico worked with the Latin America region and Spain for the study.
What was the focus of the IBEAS study conducted in 58 hospitals across five Latin American countries?
The IBEAS study focused on measuring the point prevalence of patients presenting an adverse event (AE) on the day of observation in 58 hospitals across five Latin American countries.
How many inpatients were surveyed in the IBEAS study, and how many had at least one adverse event (AE) related to the care received?
A total of 11,379 inpatients were surveyed, and 1,191 patients (10.5%) had at least one adverse event (AE) related to the care received.
What was the overall prevalence rate of adverse events (AE) found in the IBEAS study?
The prevalence rate of adverse events (AE) was 10.5%.
What percentage of adverse events (AE) caused disability, and what percentage were associated with the death of the patient in the IBEAS study?
28% of adverse events (AE) caused disability, and 6% were associated with the death of the patient.
What percentage of adverse events (AE) were considered preventable in the IBEAS study?
60% of adverse events (AE) were considered preventable.
How were the adverse events (AE) distributed among different types of care in the IBEAS study?
13.4% related to patient management and nursing care.
8.2% related to medication.
37.1% related to hospital-acquired infections.
28.5% related to surgical procedures.
6.1% related to diagnosis.
What were the five most frequent clinical consequences of adverse events (AE) in the IBEAS study, accounting for 36.2% of all adverse events?
The five most frequent clinical consequences were:
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (9.4%).
Surgical wound infections (8.2%).
Pressure ulcers (7.2%).
Other complications related to surgery or procedure (6.4%).
Sepsis (5%).