Watson And Rayner (1920) Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

A

Find out if classical conditioning works on humans
Fear response conditioned into a 9 month old boy
NS - rat
UCS - bang on a pipe
UCR - fear
CS - rat
CR - fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Generalisability

A

Ideographic
Cannot be generalised to anyone older
Picked on normalcy
He seemed fearless
Emotionally stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reliability

A

Standardised procedures ( number of days and time)
Easily replicated
Film of procedure gives inter rater reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Validity positive

A

Removed confounding variables
Watson hid behind curtain when striking iron bar
Albee wouldn’t associate noise w anything but the rat
Tested Albert before to check for pre existing fears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Validity negative

A

Lacks ecological validity
Away from playroom/ familiar nurses
Made him nervous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ethics

A

Distress to infant and continued when he was upset
Didn’t desensitises him leaving him with long time fears
Generalised fears to Santa and rabbits
Lasting impairment/ psychological harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Conclusion

A

Treatment of phobias
Systematic desensitisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Results

A

In pre conditioning Albert showed no response to stimuli
Post conditioning he cried and leant away without loud noise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample

A

Albert b 9 months old and 11 months when ended
‘Stolid and unemotional’ ‘practically never cried’
Mother a wet nurse
Paid $1 for participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure
Pre conditioning

A

at 9 months old, Albert B was tested with many white stimuli, including a white rat and cotton wool, to see if he had a fear response. He didn’t, suggesting these were neutral stimuli (NS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure
Conditioning trials

A

at 11 months old, Albert B was presented with a white rat (NS) and every time he reached for it, a loud noise (UCS) was made by striking a hammer against a steel bar behind his head, causing Albert B to cry (UCR). This process was repeated over several weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Procedure
Post conditioning trials

A

after 7 weeks of conditioning, Albert B was shown the rat (CS) and he would cry and lean away from it (CR), even without the loud noise (UCS). They then tested him with similar stimuli, such as a fur collared coat and a Santa’s beard to see if the fear was generalised
- Watson and Rayner then moved Albert B to a lecture theatre and presented him with the rat to see if the fear was transferable to other settings
- The researchers intended to desensitise Albert B from the fear but his mother moved away and took Albert B with her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stimuli

A
  • NS – the rat as Albert B showed no fear towards it in the pre conditioning test
  • UCS – loud noise made by striking a hammer against a steel bar
  • UCR – crying and leaning away
  • CS – the rat
  • CR – crying a leaning away (in response to the white rat without the UCS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly