W6 - Stage of Skill Acq & Individual Differences Flashcards
What is the differential method?
focuses on the ways in which we are different from one another
How is it different to the experimental method?
focues on the effects of certain variables on the motor behavior of people in general
What is an ability?
Are inherited traits, are stableand enduring, number perhaps 50 and underly many different skills. They can also set a limit on performance.
What is a skill?
Are developed and modified by practices. Are countless in number and often depend on several abilitties.
What is a prediction?
an expected outcome based on some measure of your ability, for example accident prediction based on your age and gender. Also used in talent ID
What is repeatability?
repeatability - a measured characteristic that reveals how stable and enduring a difference is between two people. Body weight for example has good repeatbility as a measure. Generally one person is heavier (or lighter) than another. The scores that tw beginners achieve when bowling a bowling ball would not be as the difference would largely be down to chance.
When evaluating the differences in skill between two people what 3 things need to be assessed?
Are the differences generally stable from attempt to attempt. Do they endure across time.
and differences on a single measurement are often not sufficient to establish individual differences.
Define general motor ability
Someone who possesses a strong (or weak) general capability for skilled motor performance. Assume that a relatively large number of people are tested on each of two skills, A and B. Henry reasoned that if one person was an outstanding performer on skill A, then this person would be assumed to have a strong general motor ability. If so, this person should also score well on task B, which also depended on general motor ability. Conversely, if another person did not score well on skill A, at least part of the reason would be that this person had a weak general motor ability, and this person would be expected to score relatively poorly on skill B also. In this way, skill A and skill B are related to each other i.e. that they have a correlation coefficient (r) close to +1. If the correlation between two tests is large in value (e.g., ±.80), we conclude that there is at least one ability that underlies both tests
Define motor educability
the general capability to learn athletic skills
What is Henry’s specificity hypothesis?
Correlations computed among different skills are generally very low. Even skills that appear to be quite similar usually correlate poorly.
This overall lack of correlation among skills argues against the concept of a general motor ability.
On the other hand, two skills with only minor differences (e.g., throwing 10 m for accuracy and throwing 15 m for accuracy) can correlate strongly.
The data tell us that there are many abilities and not simply a single general motor ability. In a study of 50 tests in the Armed Services Testing Program (Fleishman & Parker, 1962), the correlations among tasks were generally less than .50 unless the tests were practically identical to each other.
General motor ability simply does not exist. However, scientists have argued that there are many abilities, each with a relatively narrow group of tasks that it supports. Identify 3 (out of 6) motor abilities and how physical proficiency is different.
- Reaction time - responding to a single/ simple stimulus eg starting gun. 2. Response orientation - ability to choose from a number of alternative movements, eg batting in baseball, where the nature of the pitch and thus the bat positioning are uncertain (choice reaction time). 3. Response integration. Involved in tasks in which many sources of sensory information must be integrated to make an effective response. An example is playing quarterback in American football. 4. movement time), which measures the time of a movement produced without an initiating stimulus (i.e., not including reaction time). 5. Finger dexterity eg threading a needle. 6. Manual dexterity. Underlies tasks in which relatively large objects are manipulated with the hands and arms. An example is dribbling a basketball.
Physical proficiency abilities. Fleishman (1964) also identified 9 abilities that do not have so much to do with skills such as dynamic strength, explosive strength, gross body coordination, and stamina (cardiovascular endurance), have been identified i.e. physical fitness. There are probably many others:
What does superability mean?
There may be a very weak general factor underlying most movement skills, giving a slight advantage to those individuals with such a strong ability. Be careful, though, because this argument in no way makes correct the earlier notion that all movement capabilities are based on a single general motor ability.
How are skills and ability related?
- Any given skill has contributions from several of the fundamental motor abilities.
- Some of the abilities underlying a skill play very dominant roles, whereas others have relatively weak roles.
- Two different skills will have different patterns of underlying abilities. 4. Two different skills can have a few abilities in common.
What are the benefits and downside of using ability as a basis for skill classification?
they allow instructors to orient instruction and practice methods to particular task requirements, thereby facilitating performance and speeding up learning. For example knowing that a task has a strong cognitive component or has a particular emphasis on kinesthetic feel could influence the ways you instruct the learner during practice. Using experts to help do can sometime produce invalid response - often, very highly proficient performers do not know how they do what they do.
What are 3 things that need to be considered when trying to make predictions based on ability?
attempts at prediction involve these components: Understanding the abilities that underlie the criterion task
Estimating the strength of these abilities in applicants as indications of their future capabilities in the criterion task
Estimating (or predicting) the potential (i.e., future) skill level on the criterion task based on present information about the applicants. Made more difficult because skill improves with practice, with practice produced changes in the relative contributions of the various abilities – not changes in the abilities themselves. The difficulty is that, although an individual might have the proper abilities for novice performance, this often is not the proper pattern of abilities required for expert performance. Skill prediction is not that accurate anyway, particularly in athletics where there has been relatively little research