Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

2801 > W4 Random sampling error, bias, confounding > Flashcards

W4 Random sampling error, bias, confounding Flashcards

1
Q

Today’s Class

A

-validity of studies in health research
-major threads to validity
–bias
—selction
—infromation (happens due to measurement error, last week)
-Confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Epidemiology and Causal Inference
-Goals of Epidemiology and health research…
-Building Blocks…->

Results of research…

A

-identification of causes and preventions for disease
-measures of Disease Frequency, Various Study Designs
Measures of Association
Once you have calculated a measure of association, you need to determine if the observed association is valid and if it is causal
–assessment of validity is a methodological undertaking
–evaluation of the process of ‘causal inference’ is more a philosophical discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research Evidence
Strong evidence is (1…2…)

A

1) of the lowest possible random sampling error (a statistically significant exposure/outcome association)
2) Based on a good design
-free of selection and information biases
-under minimal influence of confounding
High validity! Of the study and the measures association
Not the validity of the measure of events or exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Internal Validity

A

do the observed results accurately reflect the true association?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Generalizability (External Validity)

A
  • to whom can results be applied?
  • requires internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are key things to note about internal validity and External Validity (generalizability)?

A
  1. If a study lacks internal validity, external validity is irrelevant
  2. We do not compromise internal validity in an effor to achieve external validity (generalizability)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

External validity

A

-will be achieved by a sample that represents the target population
–also by weighting
—more in survey/data collection methods courses
do not confuse with selection bias( healtheir, younger, educated, etc. more likely to volunteer for research)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do we determine whether our MEASURED ASSOCIATIONS are true (valid)?

A

Four hallmarks of Health Studies
1) A research question/plausible theory
2) a well thought design to address the research question
3) MEASUREMENT of exposure and outcome
4) Analysis to COMPARE groups (measure association)
-suboptimal design, imperfect measurement, and influence of other factors threat the VALIDITY of health/ epidemiological studies
- also we assumed there is no other factor except exposure and outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If we observe an association
-What are the two apparent associations?
First consider(3) before ensuring it is a true association:
-
-
-
-

A

If we observe an association
-What are the two apparent associations?
-Exposure + Disease/Outcome
First consider(3) before ensuring it is a true association:
-due to chance… if chance unlikely then:
-due to bias……If no then:
-due to confounding…..If no then:
-true association… YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Validity is..

A
  • having fewer errors (errors=measured value- True value)
    Sources of error:
    –chance (random sampling error)
    –bias: systemic error in selection of participants and/or measurements
    –Confounding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Threats to Validity

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Threats to Validity

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Random sampling error

A

1) Random error in measurement
–information bias
2) Randomization ( a process in experimental studies)

-role of chance and statistics
-sample variation, sample to sample differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Random Sampling (week 2)

A

-selection techniques wherein the probability of selecting each sampling unit is known
-following laws of probability
–12 participants out of 36 are selected RANDOMLY
–chance of being in the sample is THE SAME for each of the 36 member of the population equal to 1/36

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Random Sampling Error

A

-variability in sampling due to chance
-statistical analysis cant FIX this, reported p. value only shows how much THE OBSERVED RESULTS may be only DUE TO CHANCE IN RANDOM SAMPLING
-a wide confidence interval suggest a high probability of random sampling error
The best way to MINIMIZE random sampling error is to increase the sample size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a P. value?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Threats to Validity (check if makes sense)

A

1) chance
2) bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Threats to Accuracy(check if makes sense)

A

Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Bias

A

-refers to a systematic error in the design or conduct of a study
-when bias occurs in a study the OBSERVED association between the exposure and outcome will be DIFFERENT from the TRUE association
Most biases relate to the STUDY DESIGN AND PROCEDURES and can be classified into categories:
-selection bias
-information bias (due to measurement error)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Types of Bias
(1) Selection Bias
(2) Information Bias
Is it possible to have both types of bias in the same study?

A

(1) WHO is in the 2x2 table
(2) WHERE in the 2x2 table
It’s possible to have both types of biases in the same study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Threats to Validity (check if makes sense)

A

Selection and information
-information Bias that can occur if the collected information from or about study participants during MEASUREMENT is ERRONEOUS

21
Q

Selection Bias

A

refers to a systematic error in the way particpants are SELECTED or RETAINED in a study
- it occurs when individuals have different probabilities of being included or retained in the study according to the EXPOSURE and/or OUTCOME/disease
KEY: Participation differs on exposure AND disease

22
Q

Types of Selection Bias (3)

A
  1. Inappropriate Control Selection (control-selection Bias)-> case-control
    2.Differential Participation->case-control, cohort
  2. Differential loss to follow up-> cohort, experimental
23
Q

Vitamin D cheese study

A

go over

24
Q

Main types of Selection Bias(4)

A
  1. Volunteer bias: volunteers are more health-conscious or from a different socio-economic group..differential exposure (effect of interventions for enhancing physical activity in older adults
  2. Non-response bias: those suffering from a disease with a particular belief….differential outcome
  3. Membership bias: healthy worker effect..service in Vietnam reduced mortality rates
    4.Loss to follow-up bias: in clinical trails or longitudinal studies the sickest usually leave the study early
25
Q

2 year long randomized controlled trail of medication use and weight loss in adults with obesity. Three treatment (exposure) groups: Metformin, Orlistat, or Placebo

A

-particpants enrolled in this study with the intention and hope of losing weight
-during the 2 year intervention, 10% of the Metformin group dropped out, 25% of the orlistat group dropped out and 35% of the placebo group dropped out
-The LOSS TO FOLLOW-UP also differed by
WEIGHT LOSS (OUTCOME) and SIDE EFFECTS OF THE DRUGS (related to EXPOSURE)

26
Q

Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCP) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVP)
Backround: OCP increases the risk of DVP

A

answer the question and go over

27
Q

Reducing Selection Bias

A

-little (or nothing) can be done to FIX selection bias once it has occurred
–cannot be “controlled” in the analysis
–Unlike random sampling error, selection bias CANNOT be reduced by increasing sample size
-selection bias must be avoided through careful study DESIGN and CONDUCT
-define TARGET population
-CLEAR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA/inclusion and exclusion criteria
-Maximize response rates/follow-up

28
Q

Another threat to Validity is…

A

Confounding

29
Q

A multivariate world

A

-the simple exposure outcome model is never a reality
-relationships are multi-variable; really!
the third variable can act as a: CONFOUNDER, effect modifier, or mediator (on the pathway)

30
Q

Confounding

A

-mixed together; in which two effects are not separated
Confounding: Distortion of the actual association due to a mixing of effects between the exposure and an incidental variable(s) known as the confounder
-all part of an observed effect is due to a factor other than the primary exposure of interest
–SYSTEMATIC ERROR that threatens the internal validity of the study

31
Q

Why does confounding occur?

A

-because the ‘exposed’ group and the ‘unexposed’ group are not EXCHANGEABLE
-they differ by factors OTHER THAN THEIR EXPOSURE STATUS
-confounders are particularly a problem for observational studies

32
Q

Confounding example: Birth Order and Risk of Down Syndrome

A
33
Q

Maternal Age as a Potential Confounder of the Association between Birth Order and Down syndrome

A
34
Q

Criteria for defining a confounding variable

A
  1. Causally associated with the outcome (a true risk factor)
  2. Noncausally or causally associated with the exposure
  3. Not an intermediate in the causal pathway between exposure and outcome
35
Q

How to Identify a Confounding Variable

A

-Literature review of comparable studies
-consult experts
-statistical tests

36
Q

Example: Association of Physical Activity with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)

A
37
Q

Assessing Confounding
Step 1 + Step 2

A

Step 1: conceptualize the relationship
Step 2: think of variables with criteria q and 2
age, sex, education,blood pressure, lipid profile,diabetes, inflammatory markers , stress, diet/smoking/drinking

38
Q

Assessing Confounding
Step 3+step4+step 5

A

Step 3: exclude those on the pathway (criterion 3)
Step 4: identify true confounders
Step 5: DEAL with confounders

39
Q

How to deal with confounding
A) At the design stage
-Restriction..
-Matching..
-Randomization

A

-Restriction:limit study inclusion criteria with respect to confounding factor(s); study only men or women
-Matching: produce case and control (exposed/non-exposed) groups that have similar characteristics
-Randomization: experimental studies

40
Q

How to deal with confounding
(B) At the analysis stage
-Standardization
-Stratified analysis
-Including confounding factor(s) in a ______ regression model

A

-Standardization: age-standardization is in fact ‘adjustment’ for age
-Stratified analysis
-Including confounding factor(s) in a multivariate regression model

41
Q

Is the association between Physical Activity and CHD CONFOUNDED by sex?

A
42
Q

review im tired asf its 523 am!

A
43
Q

Does coffee drinking cause CHD?

A
44
Q

Does coffee drinking cause CHD? Cont.

A

First step: identify who drank coffee regularly

45
Q

Does coffee drinking cause CHD? Cont.
Smoking causes CHD- what if smokers drink more coffee than non-smoker?

A
46
Q

Does coffee drinking cause CHD? Cont.
Smoking causes CHD- what if smokers drink more coffee than non-smoker?
-Identify smokers and sort (stratify) by smoking status:

A

calculate the RR for the effect of coffee SEPARATELY for smokers and non-smokers

47
Q
A
48
Q

Does coffee drinking cause CHD?

A
49
Q

The big 3(CBC) threats to validity

A

-chance
-bias (selection, information
-confounding
can you differentiatie them??

50
Q

review tut for this week and write down answers

A

2801 (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions