voluntary manslaughter - diminished responsibility Flashcards

1
Q

when will this defense take place?

A

after the court have proved beyond reasonable doubt that the d had the men’s rea and actus reus of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where is diminished responsibility from?

A

s2 of the Homicide Act 1957 - as amended by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is diminished responsibility?

A

-there was an abnormality of mental functioning
-it must be a recognised medical condition
-this substantially impairs d’s ability to do one of 3 things
-must provide an explanation of d’s acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what case shows abnormality of mental functioning?

A

R v Byrne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does R v Byrne define abnormality of mental functioning as?

A

a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary human being that a reasonable man would term it abnormal (this would be referencing the voices that come from schizophrenia, rather than the condition itself)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what case shows recognised medical disorder?

A

R v Martin, R v Seers and/or R v Ahluwalia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does Di Duca say?

A

that effects from being drunk/under the influence does not count as a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does R v Woods say?

A

that if the d has a dependency on drugs or alcohol, then it can count as a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what does R v Tandy say?

A

that if d’s brain damage is caused by excessive intake of alcohol, it will still count as a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the 3 things that must be considered under ‘substantially impair’?

A

-understand the nature of the conduct
-exercise self control
-form a rational judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what case shows substantially impaired?

A

R v Gold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does R v Gold say define substantial as?

A

did the abnormality cause more than minimal impairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does s2(1B) of the Homicide Act 1957?

A

the conduct is explained why d killed, or was a significant contributory factor as to why d killed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the case for s2(1B)?

A

R v Dietschmann (use when d is also intoxicated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly